Karachi: a Tower of Babel?

[ice_man]

Sixty thousand years ago, some of man’s ancestors in Africa and the Near East were quite modern in their anatomy but differed from us considerably in their behaviour. They used rudimentary tools and were not innovative. Scientists speculate that they shared 99.9 per cent of our genes and that the 0.1 per cent of mutations that occurred over the next 20,000 years may have evolved a slight modification to their vocal tract: this allowed modern humans to produce a much greater variety of sounds bringing about the tremendously increased ability to speak and communicate and gradually achieve the astronomical progress we share today.

The spoken word distinguishes us from animals and the rest of creation. Yet, as the mobility and intermingling of peoples of many languages increases worldwide, man seems to be erecting a Tower of Babel once again. Take the example of the unfortunate metropolis of Karachi.

In 1941, more than half of the city’s less-than-400,000 population was Hindu and spoke Sindhi. At Partition, there was an upheaval: the majority of the Hindus left (or were driven away) and a tsunami of Urdu-speaking Mohajirs overwhelmed Karachi. By 1951, the proportion of Urdu speakers and Sindhi speakers had reversed. The amount of Pashto and Balochi speakers each remained under eight per cent.

Over the next three censuses, the proportion of Urdu speakers in the city peaked at over 50 per cent but the Pashto speakers slowly began to increase. In the 1998 census, in a population of 9.8 million, the Urdu speakers showed a declining trend of around 45 per cent while the Pashto speakers moved upwards to ten per cent.

Projecting these trend lines into the future, in less than thirty years the number of Pashto speakers will exceed the number of Urdu speakers. This overtaking period may be shorter owing to a number of factors: increasing Pakhtun rural-urban migration (including refugees from the 2008 Swat/Fata militancy, which is still ongoing, and displacement caused by the 2005 earthquake and the 2010 floods) to a city where ‘rupee notes grow on trees’, and increasing education levels and reduced birth rates among Mohajirs. The trend for the Sindhi-speaking population has also ramped up slightly (exacerbated by the 2010 flood and the 2011 rain-generated relocations).

In 2008, the Awami National Party was able to secure two provincial assembly seats in the Karachi stronghold of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement. The nationalist Sindhi parties (and the Pakistan Peoples Party?) are becoming restive as they find themselves overpowered by non-Sindhi speakers in their native province. In a country where no political party has a meaningful manifesto (except ‘retain the status quo’ and ‘get rich quick’) and voting is generally along ethnic or biradari lines, these changes in demographics augur badly for the party of Urdu speakers. Today, in a population of 15 to 18 million, the ‘language’ of political discourse has escalated to blind violence: in Karachi, a ‘peaceful strike’ or ‘mourning’ means that citizens are forced not to go to work, close businesses/factories, kill members of rival ethnic groups, burn buses and petrol stations — show them who is the boss!

Is it not obvious to all speakers of various languages in Karachi, that if they do not find a common ‘language’ of communication (aside from violence and blame), it may mean the end of everything for everyone? Efforts to grab or retain a larger share of the cake may result in no cake being available for anyone. Past efforts for peace by the groups themselves, by the government and by the judiciary have borne only temporary fruit.

Let us be sensible: Karachiwallahs need to simplify their lifestyles and aspirations, spread the wealth, control populations and realise that we must be smart and speak a common ‘language’ that promotes living together in peace and harmony.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 17th, 2012.


Karachi: a Tower of Babel? – The Express Tribune

 

[truthseer]

I believe the common language should be the national language

 

[user1]

Gangs of New York... plain and simple.

Solution: Writ of the state (Watch: Gangs of New York); Eradication of tribal mentality (See New York of today); Promotion of pluralism (Consult your code of ethic... any code of ethic).

"The country was up for grabs, and New York was a powder keg. This was the America not the West with its wide open spaces, but of claustrophobia, where everyone was crushed together. On one hand, you had the first great wave of immigration, the Irish, who were Catholic, spoke Gaelic, and owed allegiance to the Vatican. On the other hand, there were the Nativists/WASPs, who felt that they were the ones who had fought and bled, and died for the nation. They looked at the Irish coming off the boats and said, ‘What are you doing here?’ It was chaos, tribal chaos. Gradually, there was a street by street, block by block, working out of democracy as people learned somehow to live together. If democracy didn't happen in New York, it wasn't going to happen anywhere."

— Martin Scorsese on how he saw the history of New York City as the battleground of the modern American democracy