What's new

Jharkhand Court Convicts 11 'Gau Rakshaks' of Murder in Alimuddin Lynching Case

i will be proven right if the case reach supreme court in our lives. :lol:

Don't bother to hold your breath. The circumstances remain the same, and you will neither be proved right or wrong. Just irrelevant and insolent. Nothing personal, of course; it would be a shame to get personal with a busybody fishing in troubled waters. :D
 
.
Public interest.

Remember the phrase?

Hardly surprising behaviour in one who advocates mob justice as a substitute for the process of law.

There is no trial by jury in India, as you yourself have pointed out. So why are we hearing about juries again? They are nowhere in the picture.

Moot, since juries don't exist, except in the fevered imagination of those scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to find justification for criminals and their criminal actions.

It remains illegal, criminal. Merely describing a criminal act does not make it legal, or exempt from the workings of the law.

Now you are a medical practitioner? Or have you exhausted your stock of abuse? Sad state for a bhakt. Ask your local shakha for a larger vocabulary.

As in every previous discussion, you have started to lose your temper; the first sign of that is mis-spelt words. Then the helpless paroxysms of anger will follow. Here we go again.

LOL.

Nobody is doing this for YOUR delectation. I like baiting you and making you make an *** of yourself in public. As you are about to do.

A polite request: why don't you bite yourself in your left buttock?


Ya, I know you are begging for my attention, but I really have too much contempt for you to even patiently read your post.

If you want me to reply to your gibberish, kindly concise it into three sentences.
 
.
Public interest.

Remember the phrase?



Hardly surprising behaviour in one who advocates mob justice as a substitute for the process of law.



There is no trial by jury in India, as you yourself have pointed out. So why are we hearing about juries again? They are nowhere in the picture.



Moot, since juries don't exist, except in the fevered imagination of those scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to find justification for criminals and their criminal actions.



It remains illegal, criminal. Merely describing a criminal act does not make it legal, or exempt from the workings of the law.



Now you are a medical practitioner? Or have you exhausted your stock of abuse? Sad state for a bhakt. Ask your local shakha for a larger vocabulary.



As in every previous discussion, you have started to lose your temper; the first sign of that is mis-spelt words. Then the helpless paroxysms of anger will follow. Here we go again.



LOL.

Nobody is doing this for YOUR delectation. I like baiting you and making you make an *** of yourself in public. As you are about to do.



A polite request: why don't you bite yourself in your left buttock?
He is a Kakki chaddi cow dung sankii... :cuckoo:... He is not worth your time... Just ignore him... I
 
.
........ Yawn .....

Oh dear, we seem to have a problem. Has your care-giver not reported for duty today?

Start with the regressive practices of self mutilation during circumcision.

From there , work up to Triple talaq, and polygamy,.... after that your time will run out.

These are disgusting practices, and all right-thinking people should condemn them, and encourage their legislators to stop these. The last thing to be done is to take the law into one's own hands.

Remind yourself that this modern nation state appoints temple trusts and commandeering Temple money.

Then forget it and blame it on old age and senility.

It also has legislative control over Muslim trusts. So what?

Your admiration for the british and white worship is not shared by fellow Indians.

The difference between my admiration for the spirit of modernisation, that to you seems to be an admiration for the British, and your fairly dilapidated constructs, is that mine is a critical view of the British in India, taking the good things and the bad, and allowing each its own place and value; yours is a series of half-digested interpretations of the worst European bigotry, the products of the nineteenth century, bilge coming from Gobineau and Houston Stewart Chamberlain. It is a pity that your understanding of your own position is so poor.

But in this case, the jury system was introduced by the British in 1870's but was abolished by Free India in on the recommendation of the 41st report of the law commission submitted in September, 1969, after which the references to jury trials was removed from the code of criminal procedure 1973.

As you might find from some elementary research, these trials had fallen into disuse long before their formal removal from the CrPC. But research is not your failing, is it?

yada ...... yada ..... yada ...... yawn. :coffee:

Yup, here we go again.



Tell that to your pay master who demanded to know my role in the whole matter.

That is pushing frail human nature too far. It is so satisfying to reduce you to your natural state of incoherence. :D

Ya, I know you are begging for my attention, but I really have too much contempt for you to even patiently read your post.

If you want me to reply to your gibberish, kindly concise it into three sentences.

'Concise it into three sentences'?

One of the symptoms of nervous and moral breakdown. Here we go again.

He is a Kakki chaddi cow dung sankii... :cuckoo:... He is not worth your time... Just ignore him... I

He is an old lag, a shameless, scruffy vagabond who has been banned at least a score of times, but keeps crawling back. A psychological case; nothing else can explain his craving for repeated punishment.
 
.
Oh dear, we seem to have a problem. Has your care-giver not reported for duty today?

These are disgusting practices, and all right-thinking people should condemn them, and encourage their legislators to stop these. The last thing to be done is to take the law into one's own hands.

It also has legislative control over Muslim trusts. So what?

The difference between my admiration for the spirit of modernisation, that to you seems to be an admiration for the British, and your fairly dilapidated constructs, is that mine is a critical view of the British in India, taking the good things and the bad, and allowing each its own place and value; yours is a series of half-digested interpretations of the worst European bigotry, the products of the nineteenth century, bilge coming from Gobineau and Houston Stewart Chamberlain. It is a pity that your understanding of your own position is so poor.

s you might find from some elementary research, these trials had fallen into disuse long before their formal removal from the CrPC. But research is not your failing, is it?

Yup, here we go again.

Tell that to your pay master who demanded to know my role in the whole matter.

'Concise it into three sentences'?

One of the symptoms of nervous and moral breakdown. Here we go again.

Yes..... more gibberish.

Like I said, if you want my reply, concise your reply into three sentences.

I know that anything worth hearing would fit a single sentence, the other two sentence is to help you deal with your frustration. That is the most I can tolerate your post without having the urge to puke.

Start following this instruction ASAP.

He is a Kakki chaddi cow dung sankii... :cuckoo:... He is not worth your time... Just ignore him... I

chrislamist, if only he would take your advice. But like any dog that gets shooed away, he still comes back begging for more :(
 
.
He is a Kakki chaddi cow dung sankii... :cuckoo:... He is not worth your time... Just ignore him... I
"Kakki chaddi cow dung sankii"? Could you please elaborate on this? what exactly you mean here by that?
 
. . .
you are talking about India = Banana republic ?

Yet you let go all the convicts of 26/11. That trial will remain a trial until when?? When it comes to Yadav, you do a court marshall and convict him without any legal counsel. Indian deaths don't count.

And yet you have the gall to call us banana republic.
 
.
Yes..... more gibberish.

Like I said, if you want my reply, concise your reply into three sentences.

I know that anything worth hearing would fit a single sentence, the other two sentence is to help you deal with your frustration. That is the most I can tolerate your post without having the urge to puke.

Start following this instruction ASAP.

For starters, little one, concise is not a verb. Any more than anyone craves to read what you write. My responses to your posts are to ensure that you shut up and exit, not to be read by you; that others read it is sufficient.

chrislamist, if only he would take your advice. But like any dog that gets shooed away, he still comes back begging for more :(

Creating new terms of abuse to express your bigoted outlook does not make it any different. It remains a bigoted outlook.

"Kakki chaddi cow dung sankii"? Could you please elaborate on this? what exactly you mean here by that?

Probably - can't be certain that he cares enough to know you that well, and can't wish him the misfortune of having seen your rubbish over the years - it means that you face one every day that you shave.
 
. .
Yes..... more gibberish.

Like I said, if you want my reply, concise your reply into three sentences.

I know that anything worth hearing would fit a single sentence, the other two sentence is to help you deal with your frustration. That is the most I can tolerate your post without having the urge to puke.

Start following this instruction ASAP.



chrislamist, if only he would take your advice. But like any dog that gets shooed away, he still comes back begging for more :(

:rofl:

How many times have YOU been banned? How many different names have YOU used?
 
.
For starters, little one, concise is not a verb. Any more than anyone craves to read what you write. My responses to your posts are to ensure that you shut up and exit, not to be read by you; that others read it is sufficient.

So your objective is to teach me english and your desire is to see me quit. Got it.

I don't give a rats @ss to either your objective or your desire. Go Fcuk yourself.

See how simple communication can be between us ?


Creating new terms of abuse to express your bigoted outlook does not make it any different. It remains a bigoted outlook.

Yes, ...... you are keen to share your opinion to deal with your frustration. I get it.

Take that out on your miserable family, not me old fart. Adios.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom