What's new

Jharkhand Court Convicts 11 'Gau Rakshaks' of Murder in Alimuddin Lynching Case

. .
So your objective is to teach me english and your desire is to see me quit. Got it.

I don't give a rats @ss to either your objective or your desire. Go Fcuk yourself.

See how simple communication can be between us ?

Yes, very predictable. Once you find you seem to be falling behind, and can't answer or respond meaningfully, you start your personal abuse. Quite par for the course.

Yes, ...... you are keen to share your opinion to deal with your frustration. I get it.

Take that out on your miserable family, not me old fart. Adios.

No, not to share my opinion to deal with my frustration; just show those whom you try to bully with your rhodomontade how hollow you really are. Works every time. Remember?
 
.
This is so sad to read. India is secular and that is a good thing. Our population is predominantly Hindu - how much more Hinduism is needed?
India has never been secular. Its rather a multi-religious country. Our country recognises people based on caste and religion. Since Hinduism is in majority, minorities have always been looked upon as vote banks by politicians, while they lived in ghettos, and still do. While rest of the world was busy in industrialization, our great politicians were busy gathering votes to run country as their family business (Congress). We are paying its price now, but better late then never. All this country needs is absolute freedom of speech and expression, which is a problem since minorities get triggered by any sort critique of their respective religions and cry foul communalism. Lately Hindus have started to become like Christians and Islamists in this regard, and rightly so. The laws should be equal for everyone after all :).
 
Last edited:
.
I know you are asking me and it gives me great pleasure to deny you a reply and watch your wither in frustration.

So do keep asking again and again :lol:

You do realise that everyone reading this exchange understands what you are trying to conceal by your evasions? It's quite visible, you know. These references to the mods, this yeoman-like bearing, this gallant refusal of an eye-bandage before the firing squad, all of it is a cloud of squid ink, nothing more.

People get quite easily that you have been a whipped cur, banned dozens of times, returning with a new name, and seeking desperately those few posts before being found out and chased out again.

Truthfully speaking, you are an object of pity. To be so attached to those, to that which rejects you again and again and again - doesn't it ever seem strange to you?
 
.
Yes, very predictable. Once you find you seem to be falling behind, and can't answer or respond meaningfully, you start your personal abuse. Quite par for the course.

Pretending to be sigmund freud , are you ? :lol:

Now do you have another question for me ?

No, not to share my opinion to deal with my frustration; just show those whom you try to bully with your rhodomontade how hollow you really are. Works every time. Remember?

You are the person with the failing memory old fart. not me.

So far , I have enjoyed humiliating you and reducing your posts to three sentences :lol: ...... not bad if I may say so myself.
 
.
Yes, very predictable. Once you find you seem to be falling behind, and can't answer or respond meaningfully, you start your personal abuse. Quite par for the course.

Probably - can't be certain that he cares enough to know you that well, and can't wish him the misfortune of having seen your rubbish over the years - it means that you face one every day that you shave.
 
.
You do realise that everyone reading this exchange understands what you are trying to conceal by your evasions? It's quite visible, you know. These references to the mods, this yeoman-like bearing, this gallant refusal of an eye-bandage before the firing squad, all of it is a cloud of squid ink, nothing more.

People get quite easily that you have been a whipped cur, banned dozens of times, returning with a new name, and seeking desperately those few posts before being found out and chased out again.

Truthfully speaking, you are an object of pity. To be so attached to those, to that which rejects you again and again and again - doesn't it ever seem strange to you?

I am concealing nothing but am expressing my contempt for you quite successfully.

You are allowed to feel pity in your dying old age grandpa. Remember in this age, Self pity and frustrations are your friends.

Anything else before you start drooling ?
 
.
Ok dumbass.
aww! I hit a raw nerve, you engage me and now can't take facts?

Probably you guys haven't read it yet. Such countries are an insult to the term Republic.
republic.PNG
 
.
aww! I hit a raw nerve, you engage me and now can't take facts?

Probably you guys haven't read it yet. Such countries are an insult to the term Republic.
View attachment 461344
You just tried to change the goal post.
And I said, "you just described India in one sentence". But what did you respond? So basically it's YOU who can't take facts and tries very hard to change the topic. So the DUMBASS is clearly you.
 
.
"Kakki chaddi cow dung sankii"? Could you please elaborate on this? what exactly you mean here by that?
In kerala , the derogatory name of right wing extremists are called cowdung sankis or chanaka sankis ...Likewise radical Islamists are generally called SUDAPIS (came from SDPI)... “Chanaka Sankhi” means a brainless right wing extremist with cowdung in his head... Here social medias are flooded with chanaka sanghi &sudapi jokes ) ... ...Commie(communist),Congi(Congress) etc...
These are all same type... Ones activity benefits other to grow...
 
.
In kerala , the derogatory name of right wing extremists are called cowdung sankis or chanaka sankis ...Likewise radical Islamists are generally called SUDAPIS (came from SDPI)... “Chanaka Sankhi” means a brainless right wing extremist with cowdung in his head... Here social medias are flooded with chanaka sanghi &sudapi jokes ) ... ...Commie(communist),Congi(Congress) etc...
These are all same type... Ones activity benefits other to grow...

Oh I see, thanks for updating might use it next time. Any Mallu slang for Chrisitan bigots?
 
.
India has never been secular. Its rather a multi-religious country. Our country recognises people based on caste and religion. Since Hinduism is in majority, minorities have always been looked upon as vote banks by politicians, while they lived in ghettos, and still do. While rest of the world was busy in industrialization, our great politicians were busy gathering votes to run country as their family business (Congress). We are paying its price now, but better late then never. All this country needs is absolute freedom of speech and expression, which is a problem since minorities get triggered by any sort critique of their respective religions and cry foul communalism. Lately Hindus have started to become like Christians and Islamists in this regard, and rightly so. The laws should be equal for everyone after all :).

I agree. Freedom of speech and freedom of expression should not be limited; even if they end up offending anyone. Yes, Congress has played sinister politics in India; their duplicity in Shah Bano, 1984, Babri issue is legendary.
But I don't think Hindutva is the answer. We can't have Ministers claiming that a cow exhales oxygen or that the Taj Mahal was a Hindu temple or debunking the theory of evolution by claiming that no one has seen an ape turn into man. And none of this includes violence which is a different kettle of fish altogether.

Pathological hate is a natural response to denial of justice and in the face of repeated insult and injury.

That it would mix with vigilante justice is hardly surprising.

Which is why western nations have JURIES of their peer who get to decide their actual status, and not just on cold law.

That a cow smuggler was operating with such impudence under the nose of the police, was just a time bomb waiting to explode.

So yes, the executive did fail us, and so did the polity when it indulged in minority vote banks.



How did "Hinduism" become equal to "religion" ? :cheesy: Hinduism is just ONE specific religion.

In your eagerness to demonstrate your "secularism" , you forgot to ask how much "christiantiy and how much islam was needed" :lol:

Even then, your whole premise of the question is wrong.

Who is the "modern nation state" to decide the role of religion ? This can only mean that you DO BELIEVE Hindusim needs to be controlled and monitored by the nation state.

So either you deliberately LIED earlier when you said that you do not seek to control it, or you so stupid that you do not understand the significance of your question. SO which is it ?

Considering you appear to be a "secular", I would think you are just plain stupid. I would have preferred you to be a liar. At least there is hope for a liar to reform.

Thanks for your reply.

Christianity and Islam are not majority religions in India. An American might ask "How much more Christianity do we need in this country?" when referring to the excesses of the Ku Klux Klan and white supremacists who are driven by religion. A Pakistani might ask "How much more Islam is needed in Pakistan?" referring to the excesses of the TTP or due to sectarian violence. Similarly, as an Indian - I can ask that question with regards to Hinduism because of gau rakshaks or men dragging women out of pubs and beating them. Point being that neither Christianity in USA, nor Islam in Pakistan nor Hinduism in India - is in any sort of danger. But a significant number of ignorant citizens led by some frenzied social media blitzkreig believe it is.

As far as your childish name-calling is concerned, anyone with a keyboard can do that. Maybe it is therapeutic for you - so I shall not ask you to stop.
 
.
I agree. Freedom of speech and freedom of expression should not be limited; even if they end up offending anyone. Yes, Congress has played sinister politics in India; their duplicity in Shah Bano, 1984, Babri issue is legendary.
But I don't think Hindutva is the answer. We can't have Ministers claiming that a cow exhales oxygen or that the Taj Mahal was a Hindu temple or debunking the theory of evolution by claiming that no one has seen an ape turn into man. And none of this includes violence which is a different kettle of fish altogether.
Agreed, scientific reasoning is the way forward :).
 
.
Thanks for your reply.

Christianity and Islam are not majority religions in India. An American might ask "How much more Christianity do we need in this country?" when referring to the excesses of the Ku Klux Klan and white supremacists who are driven by religion. A Pakistani might ask "How much more Islam is needed in Pakistan?" referring to the excesses of the TTP or due to sectarian violence. Similarly, as an Indian - I can ask that question with regards to Hinduism because of gau rakshaks or men dragging women out of pubs and beating them. Point being that neither Christianity in USA, nor Islam in Pakistan nor Hinduism in India - is in any sort of danger. But a significant number of ignorant citizens led by some frenzied social media blitzkreig believe it is.

As far as your childish name-calling is concerned, anyone with a keyboard can do that. Maybe it is therapeutic for you - so I shall not ask you to stop.

You are WRONG on pretty much ALL your points.

1. US is a christian nation and its currency says "In God we Trust", It does not say "in the US constitution we trust", or not in science we trust, or not in logic we trust.

Its very specific about in who they trust, its GOD. (Not Allah or Bhagwan before you start claiming god is "universal", not its not)

2. Ku Klux Klan are NOT driven by religion, they are driven by Racial superiority and economic interest. They justify this based on quotes from the bible that condone Slavery.

3. Pakistan is Specifically a Islamic state and its Constitution states is unambiguously.

4. So NONE of the example you gave is applicable to India. So unlike in those countries where their religion IS PROTECTED by their constitution, the situation is REVERSE in India.

In India, the Hindus are EXPLOITED by the constitution.

a.) The Indian constitution divides the Hindus into numerous fractions and provides one fraction more rights to govt. jobs and education, over other fraction.

b.) The Indian constitution denies Hindus the same right over their temples and trust, that it offers the christians and muslims.

c.) The Indian constitution denies Hindus the same right to education and right to educational instutitions, that it offers christians and muslims. This is well established by the number of Hindu schools closed down due to RTE.

d.) The Indian constitution denies Hindus a homeland and treats Hindu refugee worse than muslim refugees. This is demonstrated by the SC rejecting the plea by Kashmiri pandit refugees and their invovlement of Illegal Rohigaya muslims.


SO on every count you are not only wrong, but your deliberate ignorance shows a deep malice towards Hindus and the need to deny the Hindus equality and dignity.

That you would choose to equate these real problems with some random posts on the social media shows your contempt for the Hindu cause and rights.

Finally as for the "name calling", it was merely identifying your qualities and proven by my post even back then. Your posts were self contradictory indicate either a lack of intelligence or deliberate hypocrisy. So that made you either "stupid" or a "Liar". These are just statement of facts, not "name calling". ..... now if you were intelligent, you would have recognized this, but you only prove my earlier premise that you are indeed stupid, and not really a liar. And therein lies the tragedy.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom