Cookie Monster
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2016
- Messages
- 3,975
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
Dude do u understand English? Did u not see those statements separated by commas?Prove to me " there's hardly any risk of PAF divulging info about critical Chinese tech to other nations".
I'm saying this based on the fact
Let me break it down for u...
"I'm saying this based on the fact that China/Pak have a common enemy in the neighborhood, Pak doesn't oppose Chinese interests nor poses a threat in any way, and there's hardly any risk of PAF divulging info about critical Chinese tech to other nations."
^^this above is what was said in the post...
Now let's take the first part
I'm saying this based on the fact that China/Pak have a common enemy in the neighborhood
...this means that I'm basing my speculations(that came before this paragraph) on the FACT that China/Pak both have a common enemy in the neighborhood. Did u get that? I cannot break it down in any simpler terms
What follows after is separated by commas...SEPARATED
If I wanted to write all three statements as FACTS it would go something like this...
"I'm saying this based on the facts that China/Pak have a common enemy in the neighborhood, Pak doesn't oppose Chinese interests nor poses a threat in any way, and there's hardly any risk of PAF divulging info about critical Chinese tech to other nations."
Did u notice the difference? I changed it to Red/Bold and capitalized/really enlarged the letter S to emphasize that the word "fact" would have to be plural in order to mean more than one(hence including the other two statements as facts)
Now go read it again...and really pay attention to how the word "fact" is used as singular for that statement and that statement ALONE. Anything else in that post is not claimed as a FACT.
So again I ask u...since u r taking such an issue with what I have said as a fact...
Prove to me that China/Pak don't have a common enemy(India) in their neighborhood