Indians dont use Russian Doctrine, For Godsakes I have never even heard 100guns policies in India. It is always been the british style, The regiments, squadrons, Fleet everything is based on their doctrine.
That is formation which is another thing, you should go learn more about East/West doctrine what it truly is.
And for the Quality of Indian training, You can look at the number of Western countries come to train in India, its jungle Warfare school as well as High ALtitude School, and the rest.
Other nations train, the way they need to be trained and follow different tactics, etc. Just cause they come to train doesn't mean the "Quality" of Indian troops are up. Pakistan itself has officers, etc come and train but then it's up to the individual person to take that knowledge and doctrine and implement it, durning war time.
Its like me saying SSG comes to train in the US and they are good (PS. They are), but it comes down to tactics.
There is nothing Wrong with the Russian Doctrine just as there is no problem with Western Doctrine in Iraq, its just their approach, Doesnt Mean the Iraqi's used it in the right way in Gulf War 1, Iran-Iraq would be a more good example, which in reality shows how **** arabs are when it comes to modern warfare
First of all correct your language and engage is a good discussion, instead of cursing at another race, at least they don't end up killing their own men in peace time, like India.
Other than Iran-Iraq war, both sides threw numbers, if you read about the war, Iraq requested that other Arab nations supply man power which they did. This was the only way for them to hold ground rather than technologically rendering the enemy immoble.
Then you also have the Korean war, where North Korea engaged South and US with numbers rather then with sophistated tech, and using USSR doctrine, sure their planes were some what good as well but no match for US, hell even US shot down Russian pilots + instructors, it shows the quality of their doctrine and their tactics. Which they even used in the first Chechen war and got their back sides handed to them.
Also, at times against Russian pilots in Korean war, 5 planes were sent to intercept US planes, and they still lost (read about
MiG alley, and other Korean war documentaries). USSR tactics were flawed and inept to fight modern war, another example of poor Russian pilots were Afgan/USSR war when we shot them down as well (might have been 10 but we didn't loose anything in either engagement, except a FF on our own F-16 by mistake).
Western: Small sophistated teams, backed with technology and force-multiplers work best to back a bigger punch rendering them immobile, which Russia never implemented in the past and neither in the future. Cause in Eastern doctine having a robust and large force, can cause delays and poor coordination (which costed those following it dearly).
Their's more to it than this, of why Eastern fails, but you have to open a book and fully read about both, to get a better picture which I have done, for papers in the past.
