JF-17 and LCA development comparison

[Blitzkrieg]

You have a really short stay here so enjoy it while it lasts ...

If stating the truth gets you a ban, then I should say it is really a wonderful forum to be discussing things.

 

[Areesh]

So my statement is wrong?

What else do you get from my post?

 

[Secur]

WTF is with Bharatis nowadays. They don't even know the simplest of the stuff about defense and particularly Pakistani military and have thousands of posts on this forum.

Just two days ago a bharati was saying Pakistan has no terrain hugging missile.
Yesterday we were teaching them simple stuff about rockets and Pakistani artillery
And now this. Kia jhak martai hain yeh yahan par. Even kids know about this. Facepalm.

Stupidity at its height ! You will find worst crap on the other Indian forums by these same guys ... Desperate to prove the " low IQ " theory , it seems they are ...

 

[SpArK]

Do you now need spoon feeding ? ... Haven't I posted enough stuff to prove that the project was cancelled after the Western contractors backed out and sanctions were applied to both Pakistan and China ?

Sabre II, let to Super-7 which became FC-1. Am i right or wrong?

So this is incorrect... ???well its learning.. thats why i am asking...

 

[Leo7]

If you are discussing LCA Or JF 17 Thunder please then give your source of information don,t go into debat.
Big defference in both aircraft performance Like price ,weapon carrying capaability, thrust ratio ,manourability and operational issues etc.
1...Jf 17 two squdron are operational with PAF but LCA is just get clearness from IAF
2...Jf 17 block 2 will operational in next year and 3rd block wiil operation end of 2016 but curently IAF have no,even single squdron of LCA
3...JF 17 is future beckbone of PAF and 150 JF 17 conform order by 2015 and total 300 by defence analist but IAF will operate maximum 200 to 225 LCA by defence analist anf IAF beckbone will be Sukoi 30 which is Russian technology


ALL INFORMATION GATHER FROM JF 17 AND LCA WIKIPEDIA .FOR MORE INFORMATION YOU SHOULD VISIT WIKIPEDIA OF IAF AND PAF.
THANKS...

 

[Secur]

If stating the truth gets you a ban, then I should say it is really a wonderful forum to be discussing things.

Stating the truth or expressing your opinion as long as it is on topic isn't wrong or ban worthy but dragging unrelated things , purposely acting stupid or making idiotic posts , flaming or making off topic cheap posts again and again sure is , something your new found friend has been doing all along ...

Yes , it is a really wonderful forum where we allow all nationalities to discuss topics and express their opinions freely , how many Indian forums do you find offering the same ?

 

[SpArK]

What else do you get from my post?

You didnt specify if that statement is right or wrong.

Tough question???

 

[REHAN NIAZI FALCON]

buddies 1st let LCA be operational then compare it with jf-17 ,
non operational f-22 is inferior to operational mustang ............
so 1st let it be operational then comparison will count ...
LCA is better in papers but let it be operational

 

[Secur]

Tough question???

Let Google be your best friend ( Mark 2:10 )

 

[Windjammer]

LCA Tejas to be inducted in Air Force in 2012: DRDO chief | Deccan Chronicle[

Rs 25k cr Tejas won?t be ready before 2015 - Times Of India

rediff.com: Admiral J G Nadkarni (retd) on the sad tale of the Light Combat Aircraft

 

[SpArK]

Let Google be your best friend ( Mark 2:10 )

Sabre II, let to Super-7 which became FC-1

Is this statement right or wrong???? secur, areesh.. anyone?? simple yes or no

 

[Areesh]

You didnt specify if that statement is right or wrong.

Tough question???

So you think project wasn't cancelled? And Pakistan didn't quit it.

 

[SpArK]

So you think project wasn't cancelled? And Pakistan didn't quit it.

Sabre II, let to Super-7 which became FC-1

Is this statement right or wrong???? secur, areesh.. anyone?? simple yes or no

 

[Secur]

Is this statement right or wrong???? secur, areesh.. anyone?? simple yes or no

Wrong ! Since both Project Sabre II and Super 7 were the names for the same project ... What is meant by " it led to " here ? Super 7 didn't lead to FC-1 because it was developed under completely different circumstances and requirements , the Chinese however retained the name " Super 7 " shortly for the JFT project which doesn't have any similarity with F-7 ... Comprehendo ?

 

[Su-11]

Super-7 project was instrumental in development of the JF-17. Like the wing shape for example. If Super-7 project didn't exist, then JF-17 would have never taken to the skies with the meagre funds PAF gave to jump start the project again. And we all know where Super-7 came from. Hell even Chengdu has painted Super-7 on the sides to testify to the project's origins. And now we have jf-17 psychos who think they know more than Chengdu.

First JF-17 prototype.

In the subsequent protoypes the vortex generators became huge and ugly. Yuck!