What's new

Jaag punjabi jaag party, s view about Karachitites

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's the problem with you guys. You believe that you are superior. Inferiority complex turned inside out
Sindhis don't like you for this very reason.
Punjabis do not take you seriously anyways

And that is why rest of Sindh is a shit hole and every retard from interior comes to muhajir developed Hyd and Khi for jobs. Lol..Wonder why no muhajir wants to go to areas of Sindh outside of Khi/Hyd....

As for Punjabis , they have other bigger problems ( Pastun and baloch ) to deal with .....Besides , I don't really have much of an issue with Punjabis.

The natives of Pakistan should be thankful that muhajirs made this country otherwise most of them would have remained retarded , poor and backward. Atleast now they have some semblance of a country and wealth...
 
.
That's the problem with you guys. You believe that you are superior. Inferiority complex turned inside out
Sindhis don't like you for this very reason.
Punjabis do not take you seriously anyways
Punjabis don't take anything seriously.

Which 12 son of Prithvi are superior?
 
.
The Persian minority dictator went through with selected reforms for selected feudal.

That resulted in Bhutto. Who did the same thing which resulted in Zia and Sharif.

The only thing you can blame Liaquat for is the Objective Resolution. You get your from Ali Shariati and Qom your objective resolution.



Blame Mullahs (or Ulema Su as you call them) for declaring Land reforms unIslamic


The Qazalbash Waqf v. Chief Land Commissioner judgment by the Shariat Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court of Islamic Republic of Pakistan has in effect shut the doors of ‘land reform’ in Pakistan. Land Reforms have been declared "UnIslamic" ..... No "action" against this biggest curse possible now

S/NO
62.

S.P.No & Parties

14/L of 1988 Sajwara and others
Vs.
Federal Govt.


2/L of 1989 Allah Wasaya
Vs.
Federal Govt.

Matter Involved

Para 24 of the land reform regulation has been challenged on the ground that the bar against the sale of property by an owner in the situation mentioned there is against Quran and Sunnah of the Holy Prophet.


Findings

Para 24 declared repugnant to the Injunctions of Islam. Directions given for necessary amendment till Ist January 1990.
(PLD 1989 FSC-80)


Appeal filed in Shariat Appellate Bench.
(PLD 1990 S.C.99)

http://federalshariatcourt.gov.pk/7.html



Interestingly, the Federal Shariat Court in its judgement (Dec, 1980) found nothing unIslamic about Land Reforms (by a majority of 4 to 1) .... It was the Shariat Appellate Bench (of the Supreme Court of Pakistan) which later overruled the Federal Shariat Court judgement in 1989, and declared that Land Reforms were unIslamic (by a majority of 3 to 2) ...

What happened between 1980 and 1989 ? Firstly, Ulema had been "added" to the Federal Shariat Court and the Shariat Appellate Bench (after 1982) ...... And secondly, the Cold War had ended and Socialism had fallen !! ... The world had changed and with the declaration that land reforms were prohibited by Islam, the Shariat Court had, in effect, declared the heart of the political agenda of the left in Pakistan to be un-Islamic.

When state appointed Men/Ulema begin to officially explore the meaning of God's law for the people of their own time, essentially, they are bound to get influenced by the prevailing local and global political realities. The whole idea of doing God's work is flawed, and it's best for the state not to involve itself with religion ...
 
.

Their opinions didn't last the test of time. Unless you believe that the Church(Imam) is above questioning.
 
.
Their opinions didn't last the test of time. Unless you believe that the Church(Imam) is above questioning.

With the declaration that land reforms were prohibited by Islam, the Shariat Court has, in effect, declared the heart of the political agenda of the left in Pakistan to be un-Islamic.

PS: FSC is not Shia
 
.
With the declaration that land reforms were prohibited by Islam, the Shariat Court has, in effect, declared the heart of the political agenda of the left in Pakistan to be un-Islamic.

PS: FSC is not Shia

As I said, these can be revisited lest your believe invalidation of faith if you question Imams.
 
.
As I said, these can be revisited lest your believe invalidation of faith if you question Imams.

And who exactly would you appeal to against the judgement(s) given by the Shariat Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan??

That door has been closed, forever

Unless of course a new constitution is implemented nullifying all the decisions/jurisdictions of the current courts. Not going to happen
 
.
And who exactly would you appeal to against the judgement(s) given by the Shariat Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan??

That door has been closed, forever

Unless of course a new constitution is implemented nullifying all the decisions/jurisdictions of the current courts. Not going to happen
That's BS Mr. Red Revolution. I know Objective Resolution hurts your sentiments.

Any judgement given by any Qazi can be challenged any time.

Only words of the Quran are forever.
 
.
That's BS Mr. Red Revolution. I know Objective Resolution hurts your sentiments.

Any judgement given by any Qazi can be challenged any time.

Only words of the Quran are forever.

Calm down, troll
I am talking about the law of the land here
Shariat Appellate Bench of SC is the apex court and it's judgements can't be challenged, as per the law of the land
 
.
Calm down, troll
I am talking about the law of the land here
Shariat Appellate Bench of SC is the apex court and it's judgements can't be challenged, as per the law of the land

Everything can be challenged Sirmed.
 
.
Everything can be challenged Sirmed.

Challenging the state, its institutions and the constitution directly is never a good idea
It's against the Qur'anic injunctions as well
 
.
Challenging the state, its institutions and the constitution directly is never a good idea
It's against the Qur'anic injunctions as well

I would like you to provide evidence.

So red revolution or black revolutions are to be considered as Khawarij movements?
 
.
I would like you to provide evidence.

Qur'an 5:1 & 4:59

Supported by Sahih Hadith:
“It is necessary upon a Muslim to listen to and obey the ruler, as long as one is not ordered to carry out a sin. If he is commanded to commit a sin, then there is no adherence and obedience.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, no. 2796 & Sunan Tirmidhi)
So red revolution or black revolutions are to be considered as Khawarij movements?

Anything that creates Fasad fil Arz is forbidden
 
.
Anything that creates Fasad fil Arz is forbidden
Status quo is Fassad fil Arz.

Supported by Sahih Hadith:
“It is necessary upon a Muslim to listen to and obey the ruler, as long as one is not ordered to carry out a sin. If he is commanded to commit a sin, then there is no adherence and obedience.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, no. 2796 & Sunan Tirmidhi)

The social injustice from unfair distribution of resources available to the State amounts to a Sinful deed.
 
.
Status quo is Fassad fil Arz.



The social injustice from unfair distribution of resources available to the State amounts to a Sinful deed.

That might be your personal opinion/interpretation.
The state and competent authorities believe/have ruled otherwise
You are free to criticise their interpretation/laws and propagate your own views while remaining within the limits allowed under the law of the land
But you are not free to pick up arms or rebel against the state. That's what would be "Fasad fil Arz"
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom