" It's India's right to have Permanent seat at UN Security Council " -PM Modi

[Providence]

No we do not we do what is in our interests we are a sovereign country not your subject.

The only time we sided with you was voting against Iran in exchange for the US-Indo N deal but we still continued to trade with Iran as it was in our interest.

UN conference endorses India's concerns over black money - The Economic Times

I said take sides not take OUR side.

If taking sides means siding with USA the harbringer of Democracy, you know we have been smart and the world needs smarter countries

read above

 

[Dr Gupta]

I said take sides not take OUR side.

Sides are taken according to what is on offer, if it is in our interest we may do or we may not.

We are not your poodle like Tony Blair whom you say jump and we say how high

 

[Providence]

Sides are taken according to what is on offer, if it is in our interest we may do or we may not.

We are not your poodle like Tony Blair whom you say jump and we say how high

Again I would suggest you guys to read properly.

If intention is to just abstain then better not sit for it.

 

[Dr Gupta]

Again I would suggest you guys to read properly.

If intention is to just abstain then better not sit for it.

Russia is our strategic partner and Crimea is their land, they always supported us unlike you yanks which threw sanctions upon us and supported Pakistan in the 71 war. So of course we are going to abstain we won't want to piss our friends off.

 

[Providence]

Russia is our strategic partner and Crimea is their land, they always supported us unlike you yanks which threw sanctions upon us and supported Pakistan in the 71 war. So of course we are going to abstain we won't want to piss our friends off.

ok. Come and claim the seat when u guys stop being a ruskie poodle !

 

[Dr Gupta]

ok. Come and claim the seat when u guys stop being a ruskie poodle !

Oh and you are who exactly? the head of the UN? your opinion matters?

ok. Come and claim the seat when u guys stop being a ruskie poodle !

So I was right you wanted us to take 'your side' on the Crimea front and not make our own judgement. I think you should speak to your poodle Tony Blair in that case.

 

[Providence]

Oh and you are who exactly? the head of the UN? your opinion matters?

If you can't convince a nobody then good luck convincing head of states

 

[Dr Gupta]

If you can't convince a nobody then good luck convincing head of states

We already have backing from your puppet on a string Obama as well as the French and British PM.

 

[mike2000 is back]

Russia is our strategic partner and Crimea is their land, they always supported us une you yanks which threw sanctions upon us and supported Pakistan in the 71 war. So of course we are going to abstain we won't want to piss our friends off.

True, Russia has been closer to India since the cold war as you were allies. So its normal, you got more from big brother Russia than from the U.S. even today India is closer to Russia than any other country(though its increasingly looking towards the U.S/west to balance this dependence on Moscow). Its also another reason the U.S,U.K,FRANCE are reluctant to let India in since Indias interests often conflict with theirs and you will be voting against them in quite a number of resolutions if we go by the past, SSO even less reason for them to let you in, while Japan and Germany have an even better chance as they interests often aligned with

 

[Dr Gupta]

Obama backs India on permanent UN Security Council seat - BBC News

True, Russia has been closer to India since the cold war as you were allies. So its normal, you got more from big brother Russia than from the U.S. even today India is closer to Russia than any other country(though its increasingly looking towards the U.S/west to balance this dependence on Moscow). Its also another reason the U.S,U.K,FRANCE are reluctant to let India in since Indias interests often conflict with theirs and you will be voting against them in quite a number of resolutions if we go by the past, SSO even less reason for them to let you in, while Japan and Germany have an even better chance as they interests often aligned with

France and India want to see a multi-polar world, they never put sanctions upon us and helped us in the Kargil war and supported us when we conducted nukes. The Brits will back us as the Indian NRI community is very strong and they need our votes.

We can make a peace initiative as we close to both Russia and America and can be mediator and help them ease through the current conflict.

What this guy is proposing is India to be a 'Yes' man and do what they tell us to do, but it's 2015 now not 1950. The only time we sided with them was on the Iran vote as they offered us the Nuclear deal.

 

[Providence]

We already have backing from your puppet on a string Obama as well as the French and British PM.

How old are you ? Chuck it don't answer it.

I have asked a very simple question. Just answer it at face value.

We don't need security council to balance opinions and democracy and whatnot. Security council are for the big players who don't shy away from taking a matured stance on most things. Need not be anti or pro america.

So far from India's UN history, can you prove to me that India has in it to be/act as big player ?

Eg. Let's take the Falklands case. I don't see how India can hammer out a peace deal between Arg & UK. Or for that matter, artic drilling. Can India spearhead a mutually acceptable solution to all stakeholders involved. Now I am not asking for a solution which is acceptable. But just driving the process of bringing countries to negotiation table ?

If I can chose a term, it would be tenacity to drive the tedious process.

If that can be proven then we are fine. Other wise if only because your people ffcuked around in last century to end up with the biggest population on earth, then that by itself is not a reason to ponder over candidature.

Think logically and answer.

 

[Dr Gupta]

How old are you ? Chuck it don't answer it.

I have asked a very simple question. Just answer it at face value.

We don't need security council to balance opinions and democracy and whatnot. Security council are for the big players who don't shy away from taking a matured stance on most things. Need not be anti or pro america.

So far from India's UN history, can you prove to me that India has in it to be/act as big player ?

Eg. Let's take the Falklands case. I don't see how India can hammer out a peace deal between Arg & UK. Or for that matter, artic drilling. Can India spearhead a mutually acceptable solution to all stakeholders involved. Now I am not asking for a solution which is acceptable. But just driving the process of bringing countries to negotiation table ?

If I can chose a term, it would be tenacity to drive the tedious process.

If that can be proven then we are fine. Other wise if only because your people ffcuked around in last century to end up with the biggest population on earth, then that by itself is not a reason to ponder over candidature.

Think logically and answer.

What has Falkland's got to do with India? please do enlighten me. We abstained on the stance regarding Crimea which did not endorse Russia (I think you are mature enough to know what abstain means at the UN)

As for having a large population, yes we do but we also have more arable land compared to China so do not worry about us. Rather you should look into your internal matters and stop the riots going on.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

'course it is India's right.

 

[Dr Gupta]

You first stated that India should take a view (which we did in abstaining) yet when we did you said we are a Russian poodle so that proves you are a hypocrite as you did not like our judgement.

 

[Providence]

What has Falkland's got to do with India? please do enlighten me. We abstained on the stance regarding Crimea which did not endorse Russia (I think you are mature enough to know what abstain means at the UN)

As for having a large population, yes we do but we also have more arable land compared to China so do not worry about us. Rather you should look into your internal matters and stop the riots going on.

Ok this chappie couldn't comprehend my question much less answer it. Any other indian who can answer my query ?