sahureka2
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2016
- Messages
- 1,480
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
my old photoshop.Canard in front of air intake is a big mistake
canard in front yes, but above the air intakes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
my old photoshop.Canard in front of air intake is a big mistake
Still problematic in positive angle of attack. Turbulent airflow will screw up the airflow in the intake.my old photoshop.
canard in front yes, but above the air intakes
my old photoshop.
canard in front yes, but above the air intakes
Still problematic in positive angle of attack. Turbulent airflow will screw up the airflow in the intake.
Anything in front of the air intake (no matter the distance) that causes turbulent flow will seriously damage your powerplant performance. It could be avoided for some angles of attack but ultimately is an inherently risky design and frankly not worth it.Move them further forward closer to the nose. Problem solved.
Just sides of air intakes solve the problemMove them further forward closer to the nose. Problem solved.
You could hav added some air intake above the engine.eliminate the canards
You could hav added some air intake above the engine.
But in the end the design wont go anywhere without bigger and more powerful engine than j-85 and for that you need bigger intake.
Same f-20on 11 February 2019 I had posted this photoshop
but used the longer fuselage of the two-seater versionSame f-20
Converting su22 to j10 should be considered as iriaf solutionbut used the longer fuselage of the two-seater version