Abii
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,690
- Reaction score
- -13
- Country
- Location
While I have many problems with current establishment too,but I appreciate it for somethings they did.
One of them is turning Iran's population from an illiterate one to an almost fully educated modern society,by giving chances of free education to all people.In Shah's time,I think only 50% of population were literate,but now,it's more than 93% and will reach 100% in coming years.
As you may know,many Iranians now have some kind of obsession in academic and graduate studies in university.That's why we have so much university students.
I never understood this arguement.
At the turn of the 20th century literacy was at 2-3 percent. By the 1970's it was more than 50%. By 2012 under the shah the literacy would have reached 99% for a few reasons: Iran's pop'n wouldn't have increased the way it did under IR, there wouldn't have been an Iran-Iraq war and Iran would have been 10 times richer. With time Iran would have been richer, much richer, and just as educated (even more) as today's Iran. We would have also had social freedoms and I would even argue that we would have more political freedom under the shah's regime (with time the regime would have opened up).
In any case neither the pahlavi regime, nor IR are ideal, but I'm just keeping it real and saying the obvious: we would've fared MUCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH better under the pahlavi regime.