What's new

Iran tells Middle East militias: prepare for proxy war

Why would He say such suicidal things?
one iranian on pdf said He was appeasing the crowd of angry religious extremists who were ready to invade Pakistan.

just make sure he keeps a lid on

brother, thousands of Pakistanis are fighting alongside him, surely if he were against Pakistan and if PK soldiers knew that he is against Pakistan, now we would not have any Pakistani fighting in the Middle East.
 
.
brother, thousands of Pakistanis are fighting alongside him, surely if he were against Pakistan and if PK soldiers knew that he is against Pakistan, now we would not have any Pakistani fighting in the Middle East.

true indeed.

all i said he should be more selective in his words because it gets played wrong by the evil media
 
.
Don't you think Iraq isn't in the state for this right now?

Also those militia's, which ever one of them decides to go ahead with the stupid idea of attacking an airbase which has US troops. It's the most difficult target given the surrounding area is desert, they'll just die through air attacks because Soleimani wants to once again take the battle to Iraq instead of attacking the US directly.
It's not that simple, they can be hit with missiles from long distance. It seems you don't care at all for neighbouring countries safety. You want to be a puppet? why should there be US forces in Iraq who threaten neighbours? they should go back to USA else Iran has to adjust it's strategy and tactics. Lets see you want a country which helped you during ISIS invasion and who has trade ties with you to be wiped out for 5000 pigs who threaten Iran?

Nothing against my Iraqi bros, but they would fair off worse than the Taliban. Those militias that cooperate with Iran are not battle hardened(against the US or any state military) and I don't believe they are well disciplined/trained. Their role is limited to threatening Iraqi state and assuring Iranian interests in Iraq.
Are you sure you are not israeli? you just sound so Israeli. If iran wanted to threaten Iraqi state they would recognize seperatism or promote federal shia, federal sunni region. Iran would not have supported Iraq against ISIS terrorists if Iran wanted to see Iraq destroyed. Where is this anti-Iran feelings coming from bro?
 
.
Thats a good move but in Iraq it will most likely lead to some sort of civil war so Muslims will die on both sides, I doubt it could be strong or smart enough to reach Americans, or even Saudis for that matter. Reaching people of the promised stolen land of course is rather impossible.

They should focus on getting Hezbollah ready, they are much more effective and Hezbollah can hit where it hurts the most.
 
.
What is so brave about a proxy war where people of other countries suffer? It's these kinds of actions that are not good for Iran from foreign perspective.

do you know the difference between the war that Iranians are involved in and the war in which the United States and Israel interfere? our's have end but there's after 20 years still has no end. we said Daesh ISIS will be defeated and it happened. leave it to US and there coalition and it would not have been ended in 20 years.
 
.
Just want to address these Pakistanis in Syria fighting. They are responsible for causing millions of Syrians now to become refugees. Outside of Syria for good, In there millions
Towns and cities ruined. Only Allah knows what other crimes these Pakistanis have committed against Syrian woman and children? This should have not been permitted by there Pakistani state. Helping a minority in oppressing the majority!
 
.
Just want to address these Pakistanis in Syria fighting. They are responsible for causing millions of Syrians now to become refugees. Outside of Syria for good, In there millions
Towns and cities ruined. Only Allah knows what other crimes these Pakistanis have committed against Syrian woman and children? This should have not been permitted by there Pakistani state. Helping a minority in oppressing the majority!
Whoever fights against wahhabis is an angle.
 
. . .
brother, thousands of Pakistanis are fighting alongside him, surely if he were against Pakistan and if PK soldiers knew that he is against Pakistan, now we would not have any Pakistani fighting in the Middle East.

They are no longer Pakistanis, but sectarian radical puppets committing terrorism. They betrayed their nation.

When and if they get back to Pakistan, only jail, humiliation, and la’nat from people await them.

Iran tells Middle East militias: prepare for proxy war

Thu 16 May 2019 19.17 BSTLast modified on Thu 16 May 2019 19.31 BS

Qassem Suleimani (centre), the leader of Iran’s powerful Quds force. Photograph: AP
Iran’s most prominent military leader has recently met Iraqi militias in Baghdad and told them to “prepare for proxy war”, the Guardian has learned.

Two senior intelligence sources said that Qassem Suleimani, leader of Iran’s powerful Quds force, summoned the militias under Tehran’s influence three weeks ago, amid a heightened state of tension in the region. The move to mobilise Iran’s regional allies is understood to have triggered fears in the US that Washington’s interests in the Middle East are facing a pressing threat. The UK raised its threat levels for British troops in Iraq on Thursday.

While Suleimani has met regularly with leaders of Iraq’s myriad Shia groups over the past five years, the nature and tone of this gathering was different. “It wasn’t quite a call to arms, but it wasn’t far off,” one source said.

The meeting has led to a frenzy of diplomatic activity between US, British and Iraqi officials who are trying to banish the spectre of clashes between Tehran and Washington and who now fear that Iraq could become an arena for conflict.

The gathering partly informed a US decision to evacuate non-essential diplomatic staff from the US embassy in Baghdad and Erbil and to raise the threat status at US bases in Iraq. It also coincided with a perceived separate risk to US interests and those of its allies in the Persian Gulf and led to a heightened threat that more than a decade of proxy conflicts may spill over into a direct clash between Washington and Tehran.

Leaders of all the militia groups that fall under the umbrella of Iraq’s Popular Mobilisation Units (PMUs) were in attendance at the meeting called by Suleimani, the intelligence sources claimed. One senior figure who learned about the meeting had since met with western officials to express concerns.

As the head of the elite Quds force, Suleimani plays a significant role in the militias’ strategic directions and major operations. Over the past 15 years, he has been Iran’s most influential powerbroker in Iraq and Syria, leading Tehran’s efforts to consolidate its presence in both countries and trying to reshape the region in its favour.

The US has become increasingly vocal about the activities of Iranian proxies in the Middle East. Donald Trump this month named Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a western-designated terrorist group financed by Iran and Lebanon’s Hezbollah, as partly responsible for a barrage of rockets fired from Gaza into Israel.

On Sunday, four ships – two of them Saudi oil tankers – were reportedly sabotaged off the UAE coast. The following day, drones launched by Iranian-allied rebels in Yemen attacked two Saudi pipelines. Saudi state media on Thursday called for “surgical strikes” against Iranian targets in response and its senior officials have told Washington that they expect it to act in its interests.

Adding to concerns is a belief that a convoy of Iranian-supplied missiles was last week successfully transported across Iraq’s Anbar province into Syria, where it was transferred safely to Damascus, regional diplomats told the Guardian. The transfer managed to evade US and Israeli intelligence, despite the latter’s interdiction of dozens of alleged missile deliveries in the past three years that have been flown into various Syrian airbases via an airbridge.

Advertisement

Fears of an Iranian-run land corridor emerging from the fight against the Islamic State, in which Shia militia groups played a prominent role, have been central to concerns that postwar Iraq and Syria could be subverted by regional manoeuvrings.


FacebookTwitterPinterest
The USS Abraham Lincoln, recently dispatched to the Gulf. Photograph: ONOSPHG/AP
That Iran could emerge emboldened from the Isis fight has dominated recent discussions among Donald Trump’s uber-hawks, the national security adviser, John Bolton, and the secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, both of whom are central to an escalating US sanctions programme and Washington’s abandonment of an international nuclear deal signed by Tehran and the former US president Barack Obama.

The Trump administration has remained wary of the Iraqi militias. Although they jointly led the fight against Isis, such groups were integrated into the Iraqi state structure, and have drawn increasing comparisons with Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps. While they include some Sunni, Christian and Yazidi units, they are dominated by Shia groups, the most powerful of whom enjoy the direct patronage of Iran.

The British foreign secretary, Jeremy Hunt, appeared to align the UK on Thursday with US claims that Tehran’s threat posture had changed. “We share the same assessment of the heightened threat posed by Iran,” he said on Twitter. “As always we work closely with the USA.”

Earlier this week, a British general challenged the Trump administration’s claims that an imminent threat had emerged from Iran, creating a rare public schism between the two countries whose alliance has at times been tested by the erratic nature of Trump’s regional policy.

The UK, though, is understood to have been central to the recent concerns being raised, and efforts to de-escalate a crisis in which the US has imposed a “maximum pressure” strategy on Iran and Iranian officials have vowed to defend their interests, in the face of hardline sanctions and an oil blockade that is biting deep into Tehran’s coffers.

Tehran’s ambassador to the United Nations, Majid Takht-e Ravanchi, told US broadcaster NPR that Iran was not interested in escalating regional tensions but had the “right to defend ourselves.”

The US has ordered a naval battle group and a squadron of B-52 bombers to the region, in response to the perceived increased threat. In Yemen, meanwhile, where a Saudi-led war against Iranian-allied Houthi forces is into its fourth year, early-morning airstrikes killed six people, including four children, a health ministry official said.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/may/16/iran-tells-middle-east-militias-prepare-for-proxy-war

He will have his end befitting to his sharp tongue.

Shame on Iran for not taking action against this goon.
 
. .
when daesh were steamrolling Iraq. Iraqi divisions were disappearing into thin air, with their generals throwing away their uniforms and selling the shia soldiers to get slaughtered by IS .

The Saudis were laughing, and the americans were blaming al maliki. demanding "sunni rights" (even though Sunni's are over-represented in the Iraqi government). The kurds were laughing and grabbing any land they could.

The only country that came to Iraqs defense was Iran. Hundreds of IRGC advisors poured in, revived the shia militias, stopped daesh advances, stabalized the situation and started going on counter attacks. that's when the Americans changed tune. they saw a shia alliance that would be capable of taking on daesh, and daesh started attacking the kurds.

that's when they reluctantly started supporting the shia government, to not completely lose Iraq to Iranian influence. Soleimani was reportedly personally sleeping in al askari shrine when daesh was threatninig it. lots of IRGC officers were killed in action personally leading the battle on the frontlines.

Iran also decicively helped the Iraqis kick the kurds out of Kirkuk. by using its influence on certain Kurdish faction to get them to leave, and collapsing their defenses. much to the shock of the americans/Zionists.

Iraq has a choice. you can let old arab Persian supposed rivalries get in the way. or embrace reality and see Iran is your best friend. without Iran the shia's would have at best been second class shroogis again under some sort of minority sunni rule. and I think most shia militias see that and will side with Iran once shit hits the fan. regardless of what some pro-American shia politician in Baghdad sais
 
.
when daesh were steamrolling Iraq. Iraqi divisions were disappearing into thin air, with their generals throwing away their uniforms and selling the shia soldiers to get slaughtered by IS .

The Saudis were laughing, and the americans were blaming al maliki. demanding "sunni rights" (even though Sunni's are over-represented in the Iraqi government). The kurds were laughing and grabbing any land they could.

The only country that came to Iraqs defense was Iran. Hundreds of IRGC advisors poured in, revived the shia militias, stopped daesh advances, stabalized the situation and started going on counter attacks. that's when the Americans changed tune. they saw a shia alliance that would be capable of taking on daesh, and daesh started attacking the kurds.

that's when they reluctantly started supporting the shia government, to not completely lose Iraq to Iranian influence. Soleimani was reportedly personally sleeping in al askari shrine when daesh was threatninig it. lots of IRGC officers were killed in action personally leading the battle on the frontlines.

Iran also decicively helped the Iraqis kick the kurds out of Kirkuk. by using its influence on certain Kurdish faction to get them to leave, and collapsing their defenses. much to the shock of the americans/Zionists.

Iraq has a choice. you can let old arab Persian supposed rivalries get in the way. or embrace reality and see Iran is your best friend. without Iran the shia's would have at best been second class shroogis again under some sort of minority sunni rule. and I think most shia militias see that and will side with Iran once shit hits the fan. regardless of what some pro-American shia politician in Baghdad sais

Wonder which History neo-book you get such thing...
 
.
They are no longer Pakistanis, but sectarian radical puppets committing terrorism. They betrayed their nation.

When and if they get back to Pakistan, only jail, humiliation, and la’nat from people await them.



He will have his end befitting to his sharp tongue.

Shame on Iran for not taking action against this goon.
Why so hostile brother?
 
.
Why so hostile brother?
He has a point. They are nothing more than mere mercenaries...who did a job against what is right for the benefit of Powers who don't give a f*ck about Human lives.
And those same guys like their brothers in crimes ISIS and co... will, once at home, be used by those same Powers to destabilize Pakistan...

And those same guys who refused to join their own country's Army to defend it against it's direct enemy decided to join a war Hundreds of kms away... are nothing more than cowards/scums
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom