Iran missile strike successful ,Israel failed to detect missile's warhead separation

[SOHEIL]

There's my crude pausing and paint skills again I was looking for this earlier and couldn't find it myself, can you give the link to my post?

@mohsen remember world's best sniper

Here is the thread :

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iranian-zulfiqar-missile-revealed.450590/page-3#post-8713779

 

[BATMAN]

Does this mean tomorrow or any time soon Iranian missiles would start pouring into Israel with pin point accuracy?

 

[AmirPatriot]

Does this mean tomorrow or any time soon Iranian missiles would start pouring into Israel with pin point accuracy?

Why hasn't Pakistan nuked Israel yet? That should answer your question.

 

[BATMAN]

Why hasn't Pakistan nuked Israel yet? That should answer your question.

If you don't know what happens after nuclear attack, than stop posting on forum frequented by adults.

 

[AmirPatriot]

If you don't know what happens after nuclear attack, than stop posting on forum frequented by adults.

War happens, just like any attack. So stop diverting the thread with irrelevance.

 

[BATMAN]

War happens, just like any attack. So stop diverting the thread with irrelevance.

Its you who talk irrelevant, I want to know, how your missile development is related to Israel?
Whereas in past your missiles were intercepted while heading to Mecca, NOT Israel!

 

[AmirPatriot]

Its you who talk irrelevant, I want to know, how your missile development is related to Israel?

You are turning a military-technical into a political thread! That's why you are irrelevant.

Whereas in past your missiles were intercepted while heading to Mecca, NOT Israel!

Your bullshit is almost as believable as that cock and bull story of Iran trying to assassinate you.

 

[drmeson]

THIS IS AMAZING. Do you guys remember how we used to suspect on our forum if we our missiles can penetrate through the Jewish AD and this is what we know now that they failed to detect the GRV of Zolfaghar hitting its target with CEP of what less than 50 m which is accurate enough at range of 750 km. Fateh series has evolved into Zolfaghar which we can easily assume is not the final most product of guided low apogee Quausi S/T-BMs. Imagine an MRBM Zolfaghar. That will become literally a monster to deal with for hostile AD's. May be it already exists, thats how we saw zolfaghar itself. It came out of nowhere.

I assumed before that Emad's Guided MaRV will now find itself fitted on every I/M-RBM in IRGC arsenal with a diameter of 1.25 m and that includes all of the Ghadr-H, Shahab-3 but it seems like they have installed a GRV on Shahab-2 as well (???). I thought that missile was retired because of far more sophisticated SRBM option in name of zolfaghar is present now.

Sometimes I imagine what Iran would do if sanctions on missile tests were not there. We would have seen a Sejjil-2 or Simorgh based ICBM.

.........

and guys dont feed the delusional troll.

 

[Syed Asif Bukhari]

People always underestimate Iran's technological capabilities ...

Look at this for example :

View attachment 406302



@Arminkh



View attachment 406303

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iranian-zulfiqar-missile-revealed.450590/page-3#post-8713779

.
.
.



View attachment 406304

@jha

View attachment 406306

Here you go !

@Syed Asif Bukhari

Bookmarked your post :

View attachment 406307



@AmirPatriot

View attachment 406311

Patience

Modernized shahab-2 missile :

congratulations bradar . by the way , that post was in light mode . did not know you keep such rigrous record of history .Iranian missile capabilties are genuine but fake projects like Qaher just for false bravado kills the credibilty of Iranian defense capabilities.

 

[SOHEIL]

Whereas in past your missiles were intercepted while heading to Mecca

Pure bullshit !

Mecca !? LOL

& it was not an Iranian missile ... Soviet scud ...

congratulations bradar . by the way , that post was in light mode . did not know you keep such rigrous record of history .Iranian missile capabilties are genuine but fake projects like Qaher just for false bravado kills the credibilty of Iranian defense capabilities.

Qaher is fake !?

Bookmarked again ...

 

[Syed Asif Bukhari]

Pure bullshit !

Mecca !? LOL

& it was not an Iranian missile ... Soviet scud ...



Qaher is fake !?

Bookmarked again ...

Fake does not means that it can't fly .it means whether it fullfills all standards and capability of true 5th gen fighter

 

[SOHEIL]

Fake does not means that it can't fly .it means whether it fullfills all standards and capability of true 5th gen fighter

 

[drmeson]

Fake does not means that it can't fly .it means whether it fullfills all standards and capability of true 5th gen fighter

People made fun of our missiles and UAVs 10 years ago. Now we operate separating GRV and MaRV MRBMs and our MALE UCAVs operate effectively in battle zones.

Its you who talk irrelevant, I want to know, how your missile development is related to Israel?
Whereas in past your missiles were intercepted while heading to Mecca, NOT Israel!

Provide neutral authentic proof to backup your claim your be ready to be termed as a delusional troll.

Most neutral researches agree that missiles being fired by Houthis into Saoodiland are actually Yemen bought old Soviet Scud-B with elongated fuel tanks (Almost following model of Al-Hussain missile). These modifications are being done inside Yemen, there are known factories that exist. These missiles are termed as Borkan-1/2. Other two missiles that are being used are Russian Tochka which again Yemen owned previously and another is CSS-8/Tondar-69 which probably is Iranian supplied but has Chinese origins.

Technically speaking none of the missiles houthis are firing into Saoodi desert is actually Iranian (even though I wish they had our far superior weaponary). According to some saoodi commander only half of these old soviet missiles have been intercepted by billions of dollars worth US supplied AD system. Ironic for them because these missiles are from 70s and 80s actually.

Again I ask for proof that these are Iranian missiles that Houthis are firing. Proof as in dimensions, technical aspects that can give away hints of iranian origin (Dont give some saoodi or anti iranian propaganda source)

 

[LeGenD]

Technically speaking none of the missiles houthis are firing into Saoodi desert is actually Iranian (even though I wish they had our far superior weaponary). According to some saoodi commander only half of these old soviet missiles have been intercepted by billions of dollars worth US supplied AD system. Ironic for them because these missiles are from 70s and 80s actually.

Every SAM system has a "range." Another factor is which areas have SAM coverage and which do not.

Contrary to prevalent ignorance, PAC-3 systems have very good missile intercept record in the battlefield.

While undoubtedly more capable in the missile defense role than previous Patriot iterations, the capabilities of the PAC-3 still needed to be demonstrated in combat. The United States tested the PAC-3 on a small scale during Operation Iraqi Freedom, when Patriot successfully intercepted all nine SCUD missiles encountered.

A much larger body of data was obtained recently, when Saudi Arabia, which had purchased a large number of PAC-3 systems, had a chance to test the system’s mettle during the Yemeni Civil War. Houthi rebels in Yemen had a modest number of SCUD (or SCUD copy) missile systems, some likely supplied by Iran, which were fired at Saudi military targets as well as population centers.

In Saudi service, Raytheon has claimed a 100% success rate for the PAC-3 system. Astute observers will note that some SCUD missiles did inflict damage upon Saudi Arabia and its allies; however, these targets were not defended by Patriots and thus cannot be counted as failures to intercept.

The alleged success of the Saudi Patriot batteries is a landmark achievement in missile defense. Patriot PAC-3 is the first missile defense system in the world to intercept dozens of ballistic missiles back-to-back without failure, and the record is especially convincing when the flawless performances in Iraqi Freedom and Saudi service are combined. The performance of the Saudi Patriots serves to further vindicate the system after the PAC-2’s poor performance in the Gulf War. It is worth noting that Patriot’s successes have been against SCUD and similar missiles, which are more challenging to intercept than the simple rockets and mortars often intercepted by Israeli missile defense systems.

The news of PAC-3’s success in Saudi service could not come at a better time. Poland recently inked a deal to procure Patriot systems, and Germany is considering extending the service of the Patriot instead of adopting Lockheed Martin’s new MEADS system. In addition, PAC-3 Mid-Segment Enhancement (MSE), which boosts range by 15km and maximum altitude by 50%, is under development. The combat record of the Saudi Patriots will go a long ways towards reassuring current and prospective Patriot customers that the system is capable of handling ballistic missile threats effectively and that funding MSE development is worthwhile. In addition, the Raytheon engineers will be able to use information gleaned by the Saudis to improve Patriot’s performance even further, and Patriot engineers can now boast that their PAC-3 design is extensively combat-tested and proven against SCUD-type threats.

Source: https://whitefleet.net/2016/07/16/r...s-rate-for-patriot-missiles-in-saudi-service/

PLEASE NOTE: A “strike” as indicated in the timeline does not necessarily equate a failed intercept, as many missile strikes have occurred in areas not protected by missile defense forces.

Details of intercepts here: https://missilethreat.csis.org/missile-war-yemen/

 

[BATMAN]

& it was not an Iranian missile ... Soviet scud ...

That was not the subject, a troll reply lead it to this direction.
So let's start from where we got astray.
So how is this hi-tech/stealth/accurate missile, of any concern to Israel?
While it was heading to Syria before taking an indefinite pause in Iraq air space?