The way you respond to others is exactly like this: B/S , propaganda ,B/S , propaganda ,B/S.......
Come on boy, as I get it here, everyone who got opposite opinion, in your mind is a B/S or propaganda machine.
by the way, you look more like a propaganda machine to me than anybody else, because instead of reasoning you are focusing in some irrelevant points to distract the subject and shouting some hatred slogans against politicians in Iran. Sure every politicians got his weakness and strength and each person got his opinion about them but how it is related to the IRI system of governing? De Gaulle have been known as dictator to many french citizens(look at the events before and after may 1968). Is France a dictatorship because of De Gaulle?
Again the necessity to say propaganda
About De Gaulle > when you don't know it is better to shut up. Nobody here is saying De Gaulle was a dictator. Stop reading your anti West fantasm. Just try to learn, not to imagine.
For your information some people love De Gaulle some people don't like because conservative > but everyone here agrees he is the liberator of France and he was the one who could put France in UNO strategic position + stop the occupation of american troups because he convinced France was an ally
The name you can read the most for roads streets and so, the airport and so: De Gaulle.
My bad, when I wrote conseil d'etat I meant conseil constitutionnel, but the point is not going to change. C.C. by some slightly difference is the same institutiion as conseil Gardian in Iran.
lol still you didn't understand what i explained to you
anyway people in conseil are not named the same way at all than the Iranian council: they are not elected undirectly onlyu by one
but ALL the powers:
the parliament elect few ones, president elect few, senate elects few: the three powers which are totally independant
irrelevant, and what's the point? The Guardian council and supreme leader and almost all the politician condemned his statement. And yes comparing to the first days of revolution we've got so much progression, It's not ideal but progression is fast and can not be denied.
so what? say me what is the progression?
the creation of the pressure group? the young people killed in the streets? the innocent people hanged?
I think it was misunderstanding what I wrote was about Guardian council not chief of justice. The justice administration in Islamic taught should be in the hand of Islamic experts else it became TAGHOOT. You could be against it and reasoning about an alternative system but I think it's better than being in the hand of president like united state or some other countries because it is to some extent against separation of powers.
constitution can be fine when he is someone honest as leader
but it can be a bad system when there is someone not fair
Being from a martyr family couldn't teach you the history and you need indeed to study it badly.
The hanged persons were from terrorist movements and no one had hanged till now because of protest. that's why I think you need to not listen to any rumor!
propaganda rumor ... blabla ... what a kiddish behavior.
but seems you are here to put the Ahmadinejad/khamenei propaganda: people who were in the streets didn't put bombs or killed people. they were hanged for a fake appartenance to an organization: so easy to a stupid tribunal that cheats on the advocates to say whatever they want: from LArijani to the Ahmadinejad friends in the ministers, what a great model we have
i see in any democracy people (if the death penalty is accepted, which i didn't think is islamic, but it is my point of view) cannot be hanged when they didn't kill people.
The fact you using the same words than Ahmadinejad/Khamenei shows why you come here
And yes being a martyr family i know the value of the revolution. You don't know at all, shown by your own words. The islamic values were most important for us. Today is an insult to Islam in my country
when you cheat elections, when you kill innocent people, you are not muslim
As I wrote before the democracy is a way of ruling, like communism, socialism, kingdom and all other systems. Being ancient does not make it the goal of the humanity. It has its pros and its cons. Now a days political experts are trying to change the general introduction that you stated in the way that lessening the cons. that makes so many shape of democracy in the world. Do not forget Churchill's famous dictum: "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time."
That's your opinion and respectable. In my point of view, when the majority of Iranian were pro reformists they had gotten the majority in the Parliament and it can happen again if they could gain the respects of the people again.
democracy compared to kingdom, communism, socialism???
are you ok?
again democracy means people lead their destiny: it can be in any system: communist, socialist, even a modern kingdom like north europe, and so on
democracy is not a system it is a principle, a human idea not a system o governance.