What's new

Inter Squadron Armament Competition 2019

EIIWiIVXUAAQs1z.jpg
 
ISAC features only conventional bombing and strafing.No LGBs or other advanced methods.

OC 9 can be seen in the video receiving award.


All vipers are same in terms of CRRP i.e Level bombing and CCIP i.e Dive bombing so pilot skills come into play here.

And it doesn't work like that you send all skilled pilots in a certain sqn say No. 5.Pilot appointment may matter in terms of aircraft but not in squadron.Even not always aircrafts,there are Mirage pilots who have done simulated kills against Viper pilots.Now you cant say Mirage is a better machine than Viper or even PG has done this many times.


Papa ki foj nahi hy...You go where you are told but as mentioned earlier questioned pilot is in No. 9 and not in No. 11.


What is under the left wing of the left J-7PG ?
 
PAF’s NO 11 MULTIROLE SQUADRON WINS INTER SQUADRON ARMAMENT COMPETITION*

Karachi 30 October, 2019:- No 11 Multirole Squadron was adjudged the best squadron of Inter Squadron Armament Competition, which was held at Sonmiani firing range. The closing ceremony of this most anticipated contest was held at an Operational Air Base, today. Air Chief Marshal Mujahid Anwar Khan, Chief of the Air Staff, Pakistan Air Force was the chief guest at the occasion.

Addressing at the occasion, the Air Chief said that PAF places highest premium on self-reliance through indigenization alongside modernization and expansion of existing combat capabilities. He added that PAF stands ever ready for the aerial defence of motherland and has always responded to nation’s call with full valour and commitment. Highlighting the Kashmir situation, he said that we stand by our Kashmiri brethren in their just struggle for self-determination and reiterated that the human atrocities must end immediately. He further said that we are fully alive to the situation and cannot lower our guards.

The competition,which commenced on 10 October, 2019 saw PAF fighter pilots from all weapon systems exhibiting highest level of professionalism through pinpoint weapon delivery. After a close competition, No 11 Multirole Squadron achieved highest score and was declared the winner of Inter Squadron Armament Trophy. First time introduced Best Armament Trophy (BAT) was shared by No 2 Squadron and No 8 Squadron, while No 14 Squadron won the Maintenance Trophy. Wing Commander Noman Akram was awarded the coveted Sher Afgan Trophy for being the best marksman in the competition.

All PAF Fighter Squadrons were evaluated for operational readiness and weapon system performance under competitive environment. The main highlight of the competition was exceptional performance by the JF-17 Thunder aircraft and it reaffirmed its position as the front line fighter of the PAF.

Pakistan Air Force
 

There are ranking based on each weapons systems as well like top scoring sqn among mirage weapon system and even now top among ROSE mirages and top among f-7 weapons system

I think that’s what he is referring to

I think you cannot compare older system to new one like jf and f-16 mlu especially mirages and f-7
 
ISAC features only conventional bombing and strafing.No LGBs or other advanced methods.

OC 9 can be seen in the video receiving award.


All vipers are same in terms of CRRP i.e Level bombing and CCIP i.e Dive bombing so pilot skills come into play here.

And it doesn't work like that you send all skilled pilots in a certain sqn say No. 5.Pilot appointment may matter in terms of aircraft but not in squadron.Even not always aircrafts,there are Mirage pilots who have done simulated kills against Viper pilots.Now you cant say Mirage is a better machine than Viper or even PG has done this many times.


Papa ki foj nahi hy...You go where you are told but as mentioned earlier questioned pilot is in No. 9 and not in No. 11.
That F-7 strafing was superb !!!
 
How did they determine the accuracy? they all seemed pretty accurate honestly and what were the parameters with which they evaluated the overall performance?
 
How did they determine the accuracy? they all seemed pretty accurate honestly and what were the parameters with which they evaluated the overall performance?

It was about all armament usage while we are looking at only strafing footage.
 
How did they determine the accuracy? they all seemed pretty accurate honestly and what were the parameters with which they evaluated the overall performance?
You saw a lot of dust getting kicked up but it all matters how many rounds went through the banner.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom