What's new

Indian soldier dead, six Pakistani civilians injured in cross border firing

.
How do you know which religion do I follow. I asked a question, you ducked it and didn't want to answer. I made a remark which did not talk about your religion but hinted at your inclination and what I perceive your co-coreligionists would think.

Religion is something which you people bring in every time for no reason at all.

Move on .........

ducked a question ?? lol..you are a liar ticker..a liar...You asked me a question regarding sikh incident ryt ?? that too in a thread which had nothing to do with it right ?? (see post no 96)...

I said i wll answer the question if yuo open a thread on it as that was off topic.

but what did you say then ?? you replied by calling me a MUCK. that was your way of discussion.

You are the one who ran away when were invited to start a serious debate..

you started with an off topic troll..and ended with calling me names.

I now have serious doubt wether you really know anything about my religion or any religion at all apart from your own religion (i guess)..

so yes, moving on is the option for me , which seems much better than arguing with a troll like you..as i advice earlier do not try to quote my post if you really dont want a serious debate or wanna comment on other's religion..

Mirza was the first cry baby Indian to bring in Religion, now he's trying to turn it around.

open your glasses kid.. and read the entire thread before vomiting..:whistle:
 
.
ducked a question ?? lol..you are a liar ticker..a liar...You asked me a question regarding sikh incident ryt ?? that too in a thread which had nothing to do with it right ?? (see post no 96)...

I said i wll answer the question if yuo open a thread on it as that was off topic.

but what did you say then ?? you replied by calling me a MUCK. that was your way of discussion.

You are the one who ran away when were invited to start a serious debate..

you started with an off topic troll..and ended with calling me names.

I now have serious doubt wether you really know anything about my religion or any religion at all apart from your own religion (i guess)..

so yes, moving on is the option for me , which seems much better than arguing with a troll like you..as i advice earlier do not try to quote my post if you really dont want a serious debate or wanna comment on other's religion..



open your glasses kid.. and read the entire thread before vomiting..:whistle:

I write what I feel is correct, and I don't get affected by you, of all the people, calling a liar. You ducked the question - plain and simple, because you didn't have an answer. And the question was not out of place. And you brought up religion again. This is the only thing that you base your hatred on - you damn bigot.

And yes .... move on.

Jo Bolay O Nihal ....... Sat Sri Akal
 
.
Shame on indians for targetting civiliana-
Dead indian- good riddance-
 
. .
RIP to dead indian solder which give his life to country :cry:

and get well soon to injured Pakistanis :frown:


shame on trolls of forum :tdown:

The Indian soldier was firing at Pakistani civilians and women and children who got injured, lucky that there were no fatalities. He was killed for firing at unarmed Pakistani women and children. This is a crime even in war time environment. Such a criminal should not be wished in the manner, at least by Pakistanis. What if one of those civilians, killed or wounded were your relatives. Even if they are not, a criminal should not be wished just to present or display our good wishes for the Indians.

One can understand if Indians wish RIP for him. We are not Indians.

If he was killed while fighting our soldiers an RIP wish would have been in order - not in this case. We have to differentiate and be mindful.

I am sorry sir, I must disagree with you on this aspect, no matter how distasteful it may sound.
 
.
The Indian soldier was firing at Pakistani civilians and women and children who got injured, lucky that there were no fatalities. He was killed for firing at unarmed Pakistani women and children. This is a crime even in war time environment. Such a criminal should not be wished in the manner, at least by Pakistanis. What if one of those civilians, killed or wounded were your relatives. Even if they are not, a criminal should be wished for just to present a our good wishes for the Indians.

One can understand if Indians wish RIP for him. We are not Indians.

If he was killed while fighting our soldiers an RIP wish would have been in order - not in this case. We have to differentiate and be mindful.

I am sorry sir, I must disagree with you on this aspect, no matter how distasteful it may sound.

simple words ????????????


jo mar gya usy chor do ok bus baat khatam
 
.
The Indian soldier was firing at Pakistani civilians and women and children who got injured, lucky that there were no fatalities. He was killed for firing at unarmed Pakistani women and children. This is a crime even in war time environment. Such a criminal should not be wished in the manner, at least by Pakistanis. What if one of those civilians, killed or wounded were your relatives. Even if they are not, a criminal should be wished for just to present a our good wishes for the Indians.

One can understand if Indians wish RIP for him. We are not Indians.



If he was killed while fighting our soldiers an RIP wish would have been in order - not in this case. We have to differentiate and be mindful.

I am sorry sir, I must disagree with you on this aspect, no matter how distasteful it may sound.

And you know all this, to how the events transpired , who shot whom and in what sequence because you were perched there on top of a tree ??
 
. .
I am sorry Sir.

Ye baat yahan khatan nahin hoti. Shayed yehin se shuru hoti hai.

I disagree with you in the strongest possible terms.

ok lets agree on disagree i respect them and i still feel RIP to him and you don't ok dear ?
 
.
And you know all this, to how the events transpired , who shot whom and in what sequence because you were perched there on top of a tree ??

Perched on a tree or in hell or high water. Firing with intent to kill or injure the civilians during any fire exchange is taken as a criminal act in international law. It is accepted as such by the UN.

I will not accept your explanation.

ok lets agree on disagree i respect them and i still feel RIP to him and you don't ok dear ?

Agreed Sir. We agree to disagree.

I however, would like to condemn this gesture of yours in strongest possible terms.
 
.
Perched on a tree or in hell or high water. Firing at with intent to kill or injure the civilians during a fire exchange is taken as a criminal act in international law. It is accepted as such by the UN.

I will not accept your explanation.

What explanation??..I am not giving you any!!..My simple question is were you present there to ascertain what happened.."on who fired first, on who killed whom, weather civilian injuries were intended or not"?

So on what basis are you making the above assumptions and weaving the above fairy tale events??
 
.
What explanation??..I am not giving you any!!..My simple question is were you present there to ascertain what happened.."on who fired first, on who killed whom, weather civilian injurious were intended or not"?

So on what basis are you making the above assumptions and weaving the above fairy tale??

I am not weaving fairy tales here. Our post was not located in the civilian area or village. It was deliberate act of cowardice by BSF soldiers to fire on unarmed civilians.

And cowards are not rewarded for their cowardice - irrespective.

You can shout whatever. This was an act of cowardice - period.

fight man to man, instead of killing or injuring women and children.
 
.
Agreed Sir. We agree to disagree.

I however, would like to condemn this gesture of yours in strongest possible terms.

you are free to do so i will never mind bro i have my point of view which i can't change :D
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom