no no.. not f22.. but its enough to take care of all your jf-* planes
Make sure its not underpower first before you say that to PAF friends...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no no.. not f22.. but its enough to take care of all your jf-* planes
Whoa.. What a troll!! With people like you , India will never be successful. You can join the writer and crap along..
how could i know but definelety its CEP is greater than that of A5.....just like rest of sino missiles.
You admit that you dont know.... but you still claim to know?
I feel awful when I see such title..
I feel awful when I see such title..
You admit that you dont know.... but you still claim to know? What.
The thing is China has failed to keep "the state secret" on this aspect.... it's an open truth (search the whole internet !), chinese missile are crap.
Like it or not .... reality doesn't change.
Do you understand why USA doesn't complain about chinese missile??
Simply they don't care. And the world knows the reason.
see your engines are imported.. we just need to buy engines powerful enough if we are unable to develop required engines on time.Make sure its not underpower first before you say that to PAF friends...
see your engines are imported.. we just need to buy engines powerful enough if we are unable to develop required engines on time.
I think Agni 5 having a 40 m CEP is bullsh!t to the highest degree. Why?
A laser guided bomb (BLU-116) has 50 m CEP.
http://csis.org/images/stories/poni/110421_Zhao_Counterforce.pdf
You think an IRBM has a better CEP than a laser guided bomb?
The thing is China has failed to keep "the state secret" on this aspect.... it's an open truth (search the whole internet !), chinese missile are crap.
Like it or not .... reality doesn't change.
Do you understand why USA doesn't complain about chinese missile??
Simply they don't care. And the world knows the reason.
http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/2011_CMPR_Final.pdfBeijings official policy towards the role of nuclear weapons continues to focus on maintaining a nuclear force structure able to survive an attack, and respond with sufficient strength to inflict unacceptable damage on the enemy. The new generation of mobile missiles, maneuvering and MIRV warheads, and penetration aids are intended to ensure the viability of Chinas strategic deterrent in the face of continued advances in U.S. and, to a lesser extent, Russian strategic intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance; precision strike; and missile defense capabilities.
Agni III have a CEP of 40m(for 3500-5000km).. while Agni V is said to be having even less 40m... may be about 25m for 5000km.
Here is what US thinks about Chinese military.
DoD 2011 annual military report on China
http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/2011_CMPR_Final.pdf
“Russia and China’s capabilities pose mortal threat to US” – American intelligence chief
While US vice-president Joe Biden has been visiting Moscow to reaffirm the US-Russia reset, the US Director of National Intelligence says Russia’s and China’s nuclear capabilities pose the greatest threat to the US.
President Obama's Director of National Intelligence James Clapper has claimed that Russia and China are a “mortal threat” to the US "from a capabilities standpoint”. The assessment came during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing.
Clapper said he based his assessment strictly on the strategic nuclear capabilities of nation-states that have the potential to be mortal dangers to the US.
James Clapper is a retired Lieutenant General of the US Air Force who has 47 years of experience in the intelligence community. Being the Director of National Intelligence, he has access to some of the best intelligence that the US$80 billion American spying bureaucracy can offer.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden has just wrapped up his visit to Russia trying to capitalize on the “reset” in Russia-US relations.
The White House came out to clarify Clapper’s comment.
"Obviously, Russia and China are two of the three largest nuclear powers in the world. Therefore, they have dangerous weapons and have the capacity. But he made clear that we do not view Russia and China as a threat," White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said.