Indian Missiles are Superior to Chinese in Quality, Says Experts

[Beast]

no no.. not f22.. but its enough to take care of all your jf-* planes

Make sure its not underpower first before you say that to PAF friends...

 

[Ambitious.Asian]

Whoa.. What a troll!! With people like you , India will never be successful. You can join the writer and crap along..

and blah!!! blah!!! blah!!!

lol.....India is already successfull plzzzz came out of wet dreams

 

[QSeon]

I feel awful when I see such title..

 

[Broccoli]

how could i know but definelety its CEP is greater than that of A5.....just like rest of sino missiles.

You admit that you dont know.... but you still claim to know? What.

 

[Ambitious.Asian]

You admit that you dont know.... but you still claim to know?

just guesing......bcoz of other known CEP

 

[Hulk]

I feel awful when I see such title..

I feel embarrassed, apparently some Indians like to boast, including folks at DRDO.

 

[Ambitious.Asian]

I feel awful when I see such title..

sorry bro the title was not mine........but little advice-go back to bed....

Truth is sometimes bitter...brother

 

[AADHAAR]

You admit that you dont know.... but you still claim to know? What.

The thing is China has failed to keep "the state secret" on this aspect.... it's an open truth (search the whole internet !), chinese missile are crap.

Like it or not .... reality doesn't change.

Do you understand why USA doesn't complain about chinese missile??

Simply they don't care. And the world knows the reason.

 

[Rig Vedic]

This title is unnecessarily provocative and as expected it has become a troll thread.

 

[ChinaToday]

The thing is China has failed to keep "the state secret" on this aspect.... it's an open truth (search the whole internet !), chinese missile are crap.

Like it or not .... reality doesn't change.

Do you understand why USA doesn't complain about chinese missile??

Simply they don't care. And the world knows the reason.

sound like you talking about A5

 

[chitti]

Make sure its not underpower first before you say that to PAF friends...

see your engines are imported.. we just need to buy engines powerful enough if we are unable to develop required engines on time.

 

[Beast]

see your engines are imported.. we just need to buy engines powerful enough if we are unable to develop required engines on time.

That is provided without a major redesign.... and not to mention delay. JF-17 never suffer any underpower which hinder its performance. The current RD-93 engine provided enough power for the plane to fly as it advertised.

The underpower thing of LCA is mention by IAF chief.

 

[DARKY]

I think Agni 5 having a 40 m CEP is bullsh!t to the highest degree. Why?

A laser guided bomb (BLU-116) has 50 m CEP.

http://csis.org/images/stories/poni/110421_Zhao_Counterforce.pdf

You think an IRBM has a better CEP than a laser guided bomb?

There is a limit to stupidity... Trident missiles have a CEP of about 100m(for a range of about 11500km).
UGM-133 Trident II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And that was 20 years ago.

Agni III have a CEP of 40m(for 3500-5000km).. while Agni V is said to be having even less 40m... may be about 25m for 5000km.

 

[Broccoli]

The thing is China has failed to keep "the state secret" on this aspect.... it's an open truth (search the whole internet !), chinese missile are crap.

Like it or not .... reality doesn't change.

Do you understand why USA doesn't complain about chinese missile??

Simply they don't care. And the world knows the reason.

Here is what US thinks about Chinese military.

DoD 2011 annual military report on China

Beijing’s official policy towards the role of nuclear weapons continues to focus on maintaining a nuclear force structure able to survive an attack, and respond with sufficient strength to inflict unacceptable damage on the enemy. The new generation of mobile missiles, maneuvering and MIRV warheads, and penetration aids are intended to ensure the viability of China’s strategic deterrent in the face of continued advances in U.S. and, to a lesser extent, Russian strategic intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance; precision strike; and missile defense capabilities.

http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/2011_CMPR_Final.pdf

Agni III have a CEP of 40m(for 3500-5000km).. while Agni V is said to be having even less 40m... may be about 25m for 5000km.

Where is the evidence for that CEP?

I could only find this source for that claim and it does not work.
Agni-III - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Beast]

Here is what US thinks about Chinese military.

DoD 2011 annual military report on China

http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/2011_CMPR_Final.pdf

Let me weight in idea abit...

“Russia and China’s capabilities pose mortal threat to US” – American intelligence chief

While US vice-president Joe Biden has been visiting Moscow to reaffirm the US-Russia reset, the US Director of National Intelligence says Russia’s and China’s nuclear capabilities pose the greatest threat to the US.

President Obama's Director of National Intelligence James Clapper has claimed that Russia and China are a “mortal threat” to the US "from a capabilities standpoint”. The assessment came during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing.

Clapper said he based his assessment strictly on the strategic nuclear capabilities of nation-states that have the potential to be mortal dangers to the US.

James Clapper is a retired Lieutenant General of the US Air Force who has 47 years of experience in the intelligence community. Being the Director of National Intelligence, he has access to some of the best intelligence that the US$80 billion American spying bureaucracy can offer.

Meanwhile, Joe Biden has just wrapped up his visit to Russia trying to capitalize on the “reset” in Russia-US relations.

The White House came out to clarify Clapper’s comment.

"Obviously, Russia and China are two of the three largest nuclear powers in the world. Therefore, they have dangerous weapons and have the capacity. But he made clear that we do not view Russia and China as a threat," White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said.

http://rt.com/news/us-clapper-russia-danger/