What's new

Indian Missiles are Superior to Chinese in Quality, Says Experts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bulava is the most advanced Russian missile. This is 65+ years of missile experience. Only Indians high on rocket fume claim Agni is better.


you are comparing two different missiles of different range and different trajectory and different payload.

Agni 5 with Bulava.

Agni 5 CEP is said to be lesser than 40m as per the degree of deviation disclosed by DRDO.
 
.
This is utter illogical.

India is tested its first ICBM in 2012 ,doesn't mean the technology is of 1960s .Its like saying since LCA is our first fighter jet ,so technology wise it'll be the same as Mig-21 built in the 60s.:D

India has been launching rockets since the 70s and have very well developed space program and its current rockets/missiles are among best in their class.

Of course China's technological progress just stopped after it tested its first ICBM.
 
. .
Go look at 1950's American ICBM test footage and come back tell me 2012 India is better.


This is utter illogical.

India is tested its first ICBM in 2012 ,doesn't mean the technology is of 1960s .Its like saying since LCA is our first fighter jet ,so technology wise it'll be the same as Mig-21 built in the 60s.:D

India has been launching rockets since the 70s and have very well developed space program and its current rockets/missiles are among best in their class.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Indian claiming 'superiority' is the equivalent of Sub-Saharan African claiming civilization. Laughable.

No, your laughter is comparable to Hitler's Laughter .... a few years before he committed suicide.

Mankind will beat Hankind ... your only hope is Hankind gets some sense.

On the crosshairs is chinese "assertiveness" and "arrogance".
 
.
The only difference is the trajectory, but the guidiance and flight control technology is still the same.

Dimensions are different, propellant is different, payload is different, range is different, warhead type is different. hence electronics too have to be different. It is completely a different missile from Agni 5. Are you on hashish?
 
. .
dude i think you cannot differentiate things.

Bulava It is Mirved, has a greater range than Agni.


no comparison

Agni5 non mirved version is tested, has a range 5000kms-5500kms

this clarifies your CEP problem.



There are two more test to be done.

What tests need to be done? It seems to be me that people here already can confirm a lot of the technological specs of the missile. Even this guy in the article who has no background in missile technology seem to know more about Agni V and claim a lot of the thing than DRDO. DRDO should have more confidence than that.
 
. . .
Dimensions are different, propellant is different, payload is different, range is different, warhead type is different. hence electronics too have to be different. It is completely a different missile from Agni 5. Are you on hashish?
I am not comparing Bulava with Agni V here. I am comparing the difference of its two trajectory here, it is the same missile. Interestingly that people here are indeed comparing Agni V to Chinese missiles that are different in dimensions, payload, range and warhead. By the same token, shouldn't he claim that Agni V is also superior to Bulava?
 
.
half of the world would not understand what degree of deviation means in trajectory and flight path. You are one of them.

CEP is CEP, unless it's CEP Indians made up and forgot to check that their claim is 8 times better than Russians and 2 times better than Americans.
 
.
By the way, DRDO has not disclosed Agni-V CEP.

degree of deviation is not CEP but data to calculate the approx CEP of the missile. and In the case of agni5 it is lesser than 3 decimal points.

CEP is CEP, unless it's CEP Indians made up and forgot to check that their claim is 8 times better than Russians and 2 times better than Americans.

CEP is CEP but degree of deviation is not CEP. What they meant is.. it is the world's most accurate missile in particular parameters like range, speed and trajectory of its kind.
 
.
"India has all the building blocks for an anti-satellite capability" : India News - India Today


Days after the milestone first test of India's strategic ballistic missile Agni-V, Scientific Adviser to the Defence Minister Dr Vijay Kumar Saraswat sat down for a detailed interview with Senior Editor Sandeep Unnithan. The DRDO chief explains why the missile is a technological breakthrough and how it gives India the capability to target satellites in space.

Why is the Agni-V different from the previous Agni missiles?


VKS: Agni-V is a completely new missile system. It is a 21st-century missile because of the technologies used and a game changer because of its strategic deterrence value. The missile went from drawing board to launch pad in just over three years. The government sanctioned the Agni-V project in December 2008. We began design work on it in April 2009. The missile was on the launch pad on March 14, 2012 and launched five days later.


What are the new technologies that the DRDO has developed for this missile?


VKS: Agni-V has taken us to a new level of technological maturity. This missile is entirely different from the Agni 3 and 4. The second and third stage booster of the missile are made entirely of composites. The third stage is a new booster that we developed. It is the lowest end of the tapered cone that ends with the warhead. That itself, in terms of composites, is a breakthrough. The navigation system is highly accurate. Don't forget that this missile travels at over Mach 20 in its terminal stage. Both the ring laser gyros (a device that measures the orientation of the missile and helps in inertial navigation) and the accelerometer (which measures the missile's rate of acceleration) are indigenously developed as part of the indigenous ballistic missile defence (BMD) programme. We also proved redundancies of our new onboard navigation system. A backup navigation system that was less accurate but more robust was put in place. This navigation system was supported by a unique fault tolerance software that we installed in the missile. The re-entry nose cone that contains the warhead had to be completely redesigned with new material and resins. This is because when the missile re-enters the atmosphere, it is hurtling towards the ground at over 20 times the speed of sound. Friction on the nose cone causes temperatures in excess of 2000 degrees centigrade. This system had to be proved on the ground and that was a major technological development for us.

We are also working on a canister-launched system for the Agni-V. We have designed a canister that can eject the 50-tonne missile 50 metres in the air and fire the first stage. The canister will allow us to store the missile for ten years with no maintenance. The missile will be carried on railcars and on a 12x12 road-mobile truck. Carrying the missile on a road-mobile launcher is better because it is more flexible, you just need some level ground to launch it. The first launch of the A5 was from a railcar, we hope it will subsequently be fired from road-mobile launchers.



Costs and production of the Agni-V? There is a concern that you will not be able to produce more than one or two missiles a year.

VKS: The A5 costs approximately 50 crore per missile. We will need two more tests before starting serial production after two years. The DRDO is working with production agencies for this. All I can tell you is that we will produce more than just 1 or 2 missiles a year.

What were the challenges posed in tracking such a long-range missile?

VKS: The Agni-V required a different range deployment. The range of over 5,000 km meant the missile would land north of Antartica. That meant the ships tracking the launch would have to sail nearly a fortnight before the launch window. We had a slight difficulty in that all our tracking systems are ship and shore-based. We don't have airborne sensors. We needed three ships to track the launch: two near the splashdown and one to track the mid-course correction. The ships are due to return on April 30 or, 11 days after the missile test. We have a highly integrated tracking range comprising 15 sensors, seven radars and seven telemetry systems. They did an admirable job of tracking the missile flight in real time.

Does DRDO have the capability of destroying satellites in space?


VKS: Today, India has all the building blocks for an anti-satellite system in place.

We don't want to weaponise space but the building blocks should be in place. Because you may come to a time when you may need it. Today, I can say that all the building blocks (for an ASAT weapon) are in place. A little fine tuning may be required but we will do that electronically. We will not do a physical test (actual destruction of a satellite) because of the risk of space debris affecting other satellites.



How did you develop these ASAT capabilities?

VKS: There are a few essential parameters in intercepting satellites. You should have the ability to track an orbiting satellite in space, launch a missile towards it and finally have a kill vehicle that actually homes in to physically destroy it.

We have a Long Range Tracking Radar (LRTR) used in the Ballistic Missile Defence Programme that has a range of over 600 km. We will increase the range to 1,400 km allowing us to track satellites in orbit.

It is far more difficult to intercept ballistic missiles than it is to intercept satellites. Satellites follow a predictive path. Once you track a satellite, you will know its path.


In the BMD project, we track and intercept a 0.1 square meter target over 1,000 km away. A satellite is ten times larger-over 1 meter wide.

We have the communication systems in place, again developed for the BMD project. The first-stage booster developed for the Agni-V can inject a warhead 600 km into space. We also have a kill vehicle developed for the BMD project. The kill vehicle actually homes in onto an incoming missile. We have the Infra-Red and Radar frequency seekers on the kill vehicle that accurately guide it to its target.

At what phase of development is the BMD programme?


VKS: Phase-1 of the BMD programme will be completed by 2013. In this, we will intercept Intermediate Range Ballistic Missiles with a range of 2,000 km. The second phase will be completed by 2016. In this, we will be able to intercept intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) with ranges over 5,000 km. Phase-1 has two missile interceptors called the PAD and the AAD. This year, we will be testing a new interceptor missile called the PDV. This missile will replace the PAD. Two missiles, the AD1 and the AD2 will be tested by the end of 2013 under Phase 2 of the BMD.

What about cruise missile defence?

VKS: That is a whole new ballgame because it calls for an entirely new set of missiles and radars. My team is presently studying CMD. We are looking at it as a possible next programme after finishing the BMD programme.

The DRDO has made breakthroughs in the K-series missiles for the nuclear submarine project. Why didn't you use a land-based variant of this missile?

VKS: The technologies involved in both missiles are different. An underwater missile has to deal with the pressure of a10 metre column of water above it. Hence the configuration of the missile is different. It is heavier, the structure is different. Unlike the Agni missile, this missile carries a lot of dead weight.


When will the indigenous nuclear submarine INS Arihant be commissioned?

The submarine will test all its systems this year.

Field trials of the Arjun Mark 2 ?

VKS: We have the first test of the Arjun Mark 2 in June, this year. We have given the army 80 per cent of the changes in Mark 2. There are 126 more Arjuns being built, in addition to the 126 delivered to the army. We are confident of getting another order of 350 Arjun mark 2 tanks.

What stage is the Future Main Battle Tank (FMBT) project at?

VKS: We are holding discussions with the army for this. We will finalise the specifications of the tank in six to eight months. We are looking at industrial partners for this. We want new technologies for weapons, mobility and signatures for the FMBT. We have to decide on the type of armour to use for it, whether active or passive. The FMBT will be a tank complimentary to the Arjun. It will not replace it. Each tank has its own theatre. The T-90 MBT (used by the Indian army) has its theatre, the Arjun has its own theatre.

When will the Long Range Surface-to-Air Missile (LR-SAM) be tested ?

VKS: The first successful trial of the LR-SAM was in 2010. After this we decided on a complete change of configuration. We will have another test of the modified missile in Israel in June 2012. The missile system has already been integrated into the first P15A warship (the INS Kolkata, being built at Mazagon Docks Ltd, Mumbai).
 
.
By the way, DRDO has not disclosed Agni-V CEP.
So who claimed this CEP? This has always been my question. Most agency won't disclose the true number for CEP of the missiles unless they have the intention to sell. Most of those numbers come from outside observers' estimate.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom