What's new

Indian Missiles are Superior to Chinese in Quality, Says Experts

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think Agni 5 having a 40 m CEP is bullsh!t to the highest degree. Why?

The CEP for the Agni-V is classified.

The only claim made was for the ring laser gyro based inertial navigation system, which is accurate to within 0.001 degrees per hour of operation.

Thanks.
 
.
You know why you ending up looking stupid?

The chinese forumers are online and viewing this thread .... because they are aware of the facts.

Unfortunately, you don't.

You know why you cant refute my arguments and end up talking random crap ? :azn: Just because you do not know jack **** about missiles ... You rely on opinion of some self proclaimed expert in nuclear warfare and because it suits you , you take it as fact ...

Yes , the Chinese are online and laughing at Indians and thinking

" We did this 40 years ago " :P
 
.
Does it matter? I mean, when a missile hits you, and you die, does it matter how was the quality of it?

Jeez.

Indians again....
 
. .
Does it matter? I mean, when a missile hits you, and you die, does it matter how was the quality of it?

Jeez.

Indians again....

The secret is to kill something, without the missile hitting anyone.

Understand. :tup:

On the cross-hairs is chinese "assertiveness" and "arrogance". Period.
 
.
I think Agni 5 having a 40 m CEP is bullsh!t to the highest degree. Why?

A laser guided bomb (BLU-116) has 50 m CEP.

http://csis.org/images/stories/poni/110421_Zhao_Counterforce.pdf

You think an IRBM has a better CEP than a laser guided bomb? :lol:
why you taking low IQed igorant indian's brainfart seriously?

here are the CEPs of all best ICBM from U.S and Russia
Trident D5. It has a CEP of 300-400 feet (91m-122m)
Minuteman III, with a CEP of 300 feet (91m)
Russian's best ICBM is the SS-24 a CEP of some 500 -1500 feet (152m-457mdepending on which source)

and btw Indians are using 100% made in Russia guiding system``and suddenly they can acheive 40m CEP``lol (we know ICBM is a nation's strategic assets will not sell the best one to anyone)``

I guess Indian inferior complexity reaches all level from low caste slaves to high caste bhartis```they need to mental masturbate on everything``
 
. .
Indian test, tested MIRV?

No.. not in the previous test.

Only US and Russia have deployed MIRVs as of date.

However, they will be useful to us by improving deterrence against ABMs and stronger second strike ability.

I think operationalizing SLBM is more important for deterrence than MIRV, though. However the programs run parallel.
 
.
Right on. If CEP is really <40m, then camera should be waiting right there like this Minuteman III

India has no such video because Agni 5 probably missed target by a few kilometers.



why you taking low IQed igorant indian's brainfart seriously?

here are the CEPs of all best ICBM from U.S and Russia
Trident D5. It has a CEP of 300-400 feet (91m-122m)
Minuteman III, with a CEP of 300 feet (91m)
Russian's best ICBM is the SS-24 a CEP of some 500 -1500 feet (152m-457mdepending on which source)

and btw Indians are using 100% made in Russia guiding system``and suddenly they can acheive 40m CEP``lol (we know ICBM is a nation's strategic assets will not sell the best one to anyone)``

I guess Indian inferior complexity reaches all level from low caste slaves to high caste bhartis```they need to mental masturbate on everything``
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
You know why you are ending up looking stupid?

The chinese forumers are online and viewing this thread and keeping quiet .... because they are aware of the facts. (ok, EDIT: we have one of two chinese warriors in :laugh:)

Unfortunately, you don't.

Anyway, I consider Pakistanis brothers ... albeit some of them are misguided.

Enjoy life .... and improve your own country. Best wishes from our side.
Personally I find this thread too stupid to be worth replying to. It is even more stupid than the claim from this so call expert who evidently has no knowledge of any missile technology. It is funny to see how people can get excited from this kind of craps.

Anyways, the missile people here are trying to compare Agni V to is already almost 20 years old technology. The specs people are referencing to are more than decade old. Somehow people just think that China's scientists and engineers just sit idle and do nothing to improve it? It is the same thing as some Chinese members here claim that China has something that is better than something USA has in its arsenals and claim techological supriority, but keep forgetting that USA had that 20 something years ago. No one stay around and do nothing while waiting for someone else to catch up.
 
.
Personally I find this thread too stupid to be worth replying to. It is even more stupid than the claim from this so call expert who evidently has no knowledge of any missile technology. It is funny to see how people can get excited from this kind of craps.

Anyways, the missile people here are trying to compare Agni V to is already almost 20 years old technology. The specs people are referencing to are more than decade old. Somehow people just think that China's scientists and engineers just sit idle and do nothing to improve it? It is the same thing as some Chinese members here claim that China has something that is better than something USA has in its arsenals and claim techological supriority, but keep forgetting that USA had that 20 something years ago. No one stay around and do nothing while waiting for someone else to catch up.

The US might actually be doing just that. That is because improving something already good is much harder than catching up. The US may have gotten stealth planes before we did, but we have them too now, and they have nothing revolutionarily better. Our Shenlong "space plane" (hypersonic missile) flew the same time as their X-37 "space plane" (hypersonic missile). The gap is narrowing fast.

India's gap with us is also narrowing fast, and you'd have to be blind to see that, but the overall distance is greater.
 
.
I'll tell you why meters are damn important.

Agni-V is accruate enough to target the damn building in which Hu Jintao is sleeping.

A 1 to 1.5 ton RDX or other high powered conventional explosive will blow the damn building in Beijing .... without most innocent Beijingers being disturbed from their sleep.

If china tries to misbehave with India ... Hu Jintao and his politburo will be forced to hold meetings in underground bunkers .... else they risk getting wiped out .... without even things going nuclear. :laugh:

With missile targeted right at Hu Jintao's nose .... he'll learn to me more behaved and give up pretence of "assertiveness" and "arrogance" when it comes to India.

I look forward to next meeting between Manmohan Singh and Hu Jintao ... it will be nice to observe Hu Jintao's body language.

:laugh:

Only you as a leader would do such stupid thing. Any launch of ballastic missile will be detected within minutes of its launch, and if it is found heading toward certain country, that country will retaliate within its maximum readiness if that country has the ability. No one will wait there to find out whether it is nuclear or not.
 
.
Why this kolaveri D?

Chinese missiles are real ICBM going 10000 and 15000 km long while Indian missile system has just done first test of 5000 km.

So cool down everybody, long way to go...............
 
.
Don’t provoke others with your false superiority. It was better if India turn its superior efforts to make peace in the region. How’s funny that after the test of Agni-V Indian technology became superior.

When this childish attitude will be gone?
 
.
Right on. If CEP is really <40m, then camera should be waiting right there like this Minuteman III

India has no such video because Agni 5 probably missed target by a few kilometers.



That is the problem of CEP, since most of them are claimed or estimated by others. Only the people who are involved in the tests truly know the numbers and that is even classified. All those tests taget areas doesn't exactly carry a big bull eye with them, especially if the test's target area is at sea. The designated area wound be couple km^2 wide, and the intented target is certainly not the center of that area.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom