Aramsogo
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2011
- Messages
- 1,906
- Reaction score
- -2
LOL, Indians claiming 6 to 8 times the accuracy of latest Russian Bulava missile...
MissileThreat :: SS-NX-30
MissileThreat :: SS-NX-30
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You may have heard about it, I have read the MTCR..
Do you see the countless loopholes in it to exploit..
Also.. knowledge and items are two different things.
Education in the hows and whys..
exact blueprints.. etc.
All help in making something.
Dont get me wrong.. Indian ingenuity had a lot to play in it..
But had a lot of Russian know-how to push it along.
Where the MTCR was not violated..
You get systems like the brahmos.
LOL, Indians claiming 6 to 8 times the accuracy of latest Russian Bulava missile...
MissileThreat :: SS-NX-30
it not a claim. It is an experimental value which came out visually as seen by the IN frigates stationed near the ground 0 where the RV fell. understand???
mean while Bulava is an another type of an ICBM(Quasi)
clueless thing, do not divert the topic, its about Indian's primitive ICBM technology (but labeled as superior one by an Indian 'expert') now you are trying to laugh at Chinese subs``can india even produce subs? the reality is no```then let me lower the standard, can indian even produce rifles and bullets? the answer is no toofact that the only technology that could not be hidden as they do with other hardware from being benchmarked internationally- proves to be shoddy and piece of garbage. i.e. you can't hide your subs... China’s Noisy Subs Get Busier — And Easier to Track China's Noisy Subs Get Busier -- And Easier to Track | Danger Room | Wired.com - tells us that the meme that Chinese quality is 20 years behind Indian hardware is true.
it not a claim. It is an experimental value which came out visually as seen by the IN frigates stationed near the ground 0 where the RV fell. understand???
mean while Bulava is an another type of an ICBM(Quasi)
clueless thing, do not divert the topic, its about Indian's primitive ICBM technology (but labeled as superior one by an Indian 'expert') now you are trying to laugh at Chinese subs``can india even produce subs? the reality is no```then let me lower the standard, can indian even produce rifles and bullets? the answer is no too
if the India 'quality' is 20 years 'ahead' China then why there is '0' india's 'super doper' harderware in world's capital goods industry? and again the reality is neil``not to mention your sorry country is importing all sorts of Chinese hardwares to keep your primitive manufacturing and service industries (call centers) working`
abey chuu**** ... there is a difference between a Quasi BM and BM. What Russian Tested is a quasi BM and the only Quasi BM in that range.
Come to India go to DRDO ask for it. Simple.
The CEP of Chinese missiles was added in by an edit with no references.
Indeed, the fact of the matter is, China tested its first ICBM in the 1970's. We had a 40 year head start. Do you really, really think that China, with a rocket success record just as good as the US, has worse guidance systems?
and here I thought Chinese claimed to have a high IQ. the question was not about indigenous production or home made systems in my claim. My claim was about quality in addition to the claim made in the article . Even a child would be able to deduct that when your own chief says china is 20 years behind western military technology and those same western countries offer their top systems to India. then the quality of Indian hardware/ inventory is 20 times better than yours. and yes India is making its subs which would be better than your noisy tin pots
Bulava is a true ICBM, it just can opt to fly in a Quasi ballastic trajectory.
and here I thought Chinese claimed to have a high IQ. the question was not about indigenous production or home made systems in my claim. My claim was about quality in addition to the claim made in the article . Even a child would be able to deduct that when your own chief says china is 20 years behind western military technology and those same western countries offer their top systems to India. then the quality of Indian hardware/ inventory is 20 times better than yours. and yes India is making its subs which would be better than your noisy tin pots. you should be happy india is importing small stuff from chian. its helps with population control in china , after all more people are forced into hard labor camps and more jump off roofs * cough * foxconn
abey chuu**** ... there is a difference between a Quasi BM and BM. What Russian Tested is a quasi BM and the only Quasi BM in that range.
Come to India go to DRDO ask for it. Simple.