What's new

indian Citizenship, Visas Made Easy for hindusand sikh Refugees from Pakistan, Bangladesh

funny thing about the bumbling indian idiots here is that they have zero clue about the split within the Ahmediyya/Qaddiani sect

:laugh:

Nobody in India gives a damn whether there is a split, what their differences are or what they believe in! The point being made here is related only to how & whether it (granting asylum/citizenship) is reflective of the secular ethos of the Indian constitution & whether or not other minorities claiming persecution would be accorded similar treatment. The religious practices of the individuals is hardly the concern here.
 
.
Please refer to @Bang Galore's post. Only those facing institutional discrimination can be considered. Shias won't count. Ahemdias - most probably yes, but till now we have seen rare cases so far.

Hindus and Sikhs of Pakistan in India are actually underprivileged. Highly so, infact.
I have gone through his post already.
 
.
Nobody in India gives a damn whether there is a split, what their differences are or what they believe in! The point being made here is related only to how & whether it (granting asylum/citizenship) is reflective of the secular ethos of the Indian constitution & whether or not other minorities claiming persecution would be accorded similar treatment. The religious practices of the individuals is hardly the concern here.

we can see how sickular you are - a fanatical hindu terrorist/extremist is your prime minister

thats ALL we need to know

for anyone to get "asylum" in india is like a vacationer going to the ganges "river" with sun lotion and a beach ball hoping to relax near water and sand
 
.
I have seen you try & equate the two more than a few times. What, in your opinion, is a liberal "extremist"? What makes him/her an extremist? In any case are you trying to equate someone using force & weapons with someone holding an opinion?

:) force and weapons are applied after weapon of opinion paves the way for these. All these are hands in glove.

And above all they are not merely opinion airing subjects. There are far dangerous tools in their use than a piece metal .

extremism of both kinds lead to destruction
 
.
Please refer to @Bang Galore's post. Only those facing institutional discrimination can be considered. Shias won't count. Ahemdias - most probably yes, but till now we have seen rare cases so far.

Hindus and Sikhs of Pakistan in India are actually underprivileged. Highly so, infact.
we can see how sickular you are - a fanatical hindu terrorist/extremist is your prime minister

thats ALL we need to know

oh! choo chweet ! Nightmare of Modi is still haunting you !!
 
. .
:) force and weapons are applied after weapon of opinion paves the way for these. All these are hands in glove.

And above all they are not merely opinion airing subjects. There are far dangerous tools in their use than a piece metal .

extremism of both kinds lead to destruction

Still asking....what is your definition of a liberal extremist?
 
.
Good. :enjoy: Nothing like a clear cut answer from the First line of Offense. :omghaha:

i try to make it as clear and concise for some of you dot-heads here who get overly enthusiastic over such topics :enjoy:

oh! choo chweet ! Nightmare of Modi is still haunting you !!

No the nightmare would be reserved for the Muslims of india who i'm sure are so thrilled to see some mickey mouse looking character who did nothing to stop violence against them

modi in power just reminds Pakistanis how grateful we are to our nations founders/freedom fighters
 
.
we can see how sickular you are - a fanatical hindu terrorist/extremist is your prime minister

thats ALL we need to know

The key that you need to know is that no matter who gets elected, they have to work with a secular constitution. Regardless of the nature of an individual's/party's inclination, the constitution sets the broad parameters for conduct of policy and the Judiciary are tasked with enforcing it if there is any discrepancy.
 
.
i try to make it as clear and concise for some of you dot-heads here who get overly enthusiastic over such topics :enjoy:



No the nightmare would be reserved for the Muslims of india who i'm sure are so thrilled to see some mickey mouse looking character who did nothing to stop violence against them

modi in power just reminds Pakistanis how grateful we are to our nations founders/freedom fighters

yet to see any migration of poor persecuted Indian Muslims to the citadel of Islam! While in 97% pure pakistan people are trying to make pakistan purer and purer and making hindu girls fall in love with local beardos by any means possible.

But hey when there will be no minority in pakistan where will the wolves go !
 
.
yet to see any migration of poor persecuted Indian Muslims to the citadel of Islam! While in 97% pure pakistan people are trying to make pakistan purer and purer and making hindu girls fall in love with local beardos by any means possible.

But hey when there will be no minority in pakistan where will the wolves go !

if i were you, i'd focus on providing safety to your own minorities first....how many more Gujrat or Orissa type massacres till you funny looking people actually clean up your own house first
 
.
if i were you, i'd focus on providing safety to your own minorities first....how many more Gujrat or Orissa type massacres till you funny looking people actually clean up your own house first

674895 ........ that's the figure .
 
. . .
You can not even look to Bharat as you have already got a country on the name of religion. This citizenship is for Hindus and shikhs and at the most for Ahemadias.

Ahmedis led the call for partition of India. They were the most ardent believers of Pakistan, so please do not make the mistake of shedding tears for them.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom