That's laughable. You still did not understand why India declared about surgical strikes. Forget the evidence. The evidence of surgical strike is not required because it's of no use. Pakistan Army just want to safeguard it's ego in the eyes of Pakistanis. A country retaliates military if the counterpart makes such claims to teach the lesson. But Pakistan avoided the skirmish.
Rather it was India who escalated and remember two of your soldiers got martyred the same night when surgical strikes took place?
From Indian point of view India wanted a reason to escalate so that rather the tangoes Pakistani regulars and irregulars are raided. Which was achieved.
Now coming with Tangos term and back to square one like your first post...... India wanted to escalate but Pakistan this & that... Really. However, it is laughable and many does so because of no evidence but verbal threats and claims and that is what you have been doing here from the start. India did not want to escalate but made a propaganda claim and thrown a bait that we may fall for it but what happened next was totally contrary to the wish of GoI and rubbed all claims. Check media and all and see the contradictions, unlimited contradictions with single so-called strike.
It does not matter which mark the weapons had. What matters is the tangos were from Pakistan.
The Pakistani response was way way lower than expected. The cross border raids are not so uncommon. In which soldier Chandu was Kidnapped basically as a bargain. These tactics are nothing new.
Again Tangos, not a good catch though. Those were your own charlies as preparation for UN and the rest is all selling the beans by NaMO and Company. Chandu was kidnapped???? So an army which soldiers are kidnapped regularly like Kulbushan to Chandu, claims the so-called strike and all that.... Decide first either IA can conduct such strike that couldn't save own soldiers. Give it a rest.
During operation Gibraltar the Pak army SSG units with regular soldiers were sent out in casuals to occupy the peaks one cannot differentiate in a city where there are more irregulars than civilians. This was rather exposed by your media only that many ex service men were present in the town to assist pak army.
So this is not trustworthy situation where Indian army can take any chance. It is also possible that there are training grounds in the towns and definitely arty barrage positions which were struck.
Again referring to further off-topic subjects. However, men sent on mission and civilian living in area are different but such is the comprehension problem from IA to civilian that cannot separate two different things/subjects totally. By that definition, every living person on this side is actually an irregular and threat to India, what a logic but that is far from understanding for non-professionals.
Only an insane military planner will launch a strike where a Pakistani Post has to be encountered first. Your all assessment is wrong.
What happened is Indian army struck in the night. Terminated the tangos and while returning the Pak army resisted and there PA lost two of it's men who were most probably either guarding the launch pads or on patrol.
Again Tangos.... IA crossed the border and tried to score the kills to avenge URI. It is true that we lost 2 of our Jawans, did you bother asking anyone there that how many IA lost contrary to your DM Parikar claim to compare IA with Hanuman so that people wouldn't question the authenticity and capability due to a psych stroke played by him that people bought largely.
You are copy pasting the same lines again & again so I am not asking to agree with me hence, you can agree to disagree and move-on/get over it. Stop quoting me to read the same repeated thing. You are all depending which has been discussed a lot here so no need to tell us that we already heard by many members, Indian Media and GoI, therefore, as there is nothing new, comeback when you have proof in your hands.
