What's new

India to Deploy Massive Tank Army Along Border With Pakistan

Do you think India is trying to start war with Pakistan?


  • Total voters
    171
i proved your point of you guys getting in lahore wrong... so let me explain this one too for you... as you guys have covered 270 km of their territory... they were on the verge of running over your part of punjab... and it was becasue of this that you guys had to agree to a ceasefire... because the war was going nowhere

the war was fought for Kashmir not Punjab.
You failed miserably because Lahore was at stake.
 
MESSAGE FOR MODI-PODI:

Fu#% Off. We are busy and not interested.
he is not offering you the indian Tank that you are not interested....if he deploys massive tanks on border, your military and defense planners ought to respond...ofcourse internet warriors like you and me can talk big but that wont win you the war!
 
the war was fought for Kashmir not Punjab.
You failed miserably because Lahore was at stake.
thats the point... while you were busy thrusting into pakistan... you had no men to defend flanks and pakistan had no obstacle to get the entire pubjab... hence the cease fire was signed... else if india actually did go into lahore or wanted a complete win... pakistan wouldn't exist today... but we all know thats not the case.
and as i am sure @DESERT FIGHTER proved my point to you.
 
thats the point... while you were busy thrusting into pakistan... you had no men to defend flanks and pakistan had no obstacle to get the entire pubjab... hence the cease fire was signed... else if india actually did go into lahore or wanted a complete win... pakistan wouldn't exist today... but we all know thats not the case.
and as i am sure @DESERT FIGHTER proved my point to you.
First you decide you fought war for mars, moon , kerela, florida, punjab or to take kashmir.

Did you succeed? No


You were bargained to retreat from Kashmir because India replied in Punjab. IT was our plan to put pressure on punjab because its easy to take back territory if lost in plains than hills.

Otherwise you would be celebrating victory day like we do. Not Defence day.

Dont come with BS all the time. Most of the Indian members have started taking most you guys as mental retards here and nothing more than jokers for these stupid statements and posts.
 
First you decide you fought war for mars, moon , kerela, florida, punjab or to take kashmir.

Did you succeed? No


You were bargained to retreat from Kashmir because India replied in Punjab. IT was our plan to put pressure on punjab because its easy to take back territory if lost in plains than hills.

Otherwise you would be celebrating victory day like we do. Not Defence day.

Dont come with BS all the time. Most of the Indian members have started taking most you guys as mental retards here and nothing more than jokers for these stupid statements and posts.
you claim of you guys getting into lahore...

did pakistan dissolve as a result of so called capturing of their capital? - no
did they surrender either- no

Dont come with BS all the time. Most of the other countries members have started taking most you guys as mental retards here and nothing more than jokers for stupid idiotic claims of victory in 65 or 60s
First you decide you fought war for mars, moon , kerela, florida, punjab or to take kashmir.

Did you succeed? No


You were bargained to retreat from Kashmir because India replied in Punjab. IT was our plan to put pressure on punjab because its easy to take back territory if lost in plains than hills.

Otherwise you would be celebrating victory day like we do. Not Defence day.

Dont come with BS all the time. Most of the Indian members have started taking most you guys as mental retards here and nothing more than jokers for these stupid statements and posts.
 
you claim of you guys getting into lahore...

did pakistan dissolve as a result of so called capturing of their capital? - no
did they surrender either- no

Dont come with BS all the time. Most of the other countries members have started taking most you guys as mental retards here and nothing more than jokers for stupid idiotic claims of victory in 65 or 60s

India's aim was to defends it's border when Pakistan launched operation in Kashmir to CAPTURE KASHMIR and India successfully accomplished it.
 
you claim of you guys getting into lahore...

did pakistan dissolve as a result of so called capturing of their capital? - no
did they surrender either- no

Dont come with BS all the time. Most of the other countries members have started taking most you guys as mental retards here and nothing more than jokers for stupid idiotic claims of victory in 65 or 60s

Khaled, bro...Here is gift for you....

All those who are arguing with Khaled, should know that he will blow your *** apart within no second...

Al Khalid Tank of Pakistan :enjoy:

Modernization+of+Al-Khalid+Main+Battle+Tank+%2528MBT%2529+PAKISTAN+ARMY+I+II.jpg


when people in other forums say that there are some crazy people here they are not at all kidding.

Then why did you join this "crazy" forum??? :crazy:
 
Khaled, bro...Here is gift for you....

All those who are arguing with Khaled, should know that he will blow your *** apart within no second...

Al Khalid Tank of Pakistan :enjoy:

Modernization+of+Al-Khalid+Main+Battle+Tank+%2528MBT%2529+PAKISTAN+ARMY+I+II.jpg




Then why did you join this "crazy" forum??? :crazy:
unfortunately a ship named after me in bd was renamed... BNS bangabandhu... -_-
following commonwealth nations traditions... its bad luck to rename a ship. :/
 
i proved your point of you guys getting in lahore wrong... so let me explain this one too for you... as you guys have covered 270 km of their territory... they were on the verge of running over your part of punjab... and it was becasue of this that you guys had to agree to a ceasefire... because the war was going nowhere
We had more ammo than them and even if they advanced to Punjab they couldnt sustain anything as shown by my quotes of big writers on the situation.
 
We had more ammo than them and even if they advanced to Punjab they couldnt sustain anything as shown by my quotes of big writers on the situation.
having more advanced firepower, more of anything guarantees nothing in warfare...
take for example the general whose goes by the name khaled bin waleed...

he was a non muslim at the time and with around 20 men, he defeated a strong arab army of 1000 men...
then take for example battle of plassey... keep the trechary part aside but the nawab had more of everything... didn't guarantee his success either...

hence your argument is invalid.

Well...U can thank us that we have named our MBTs on your name...Compensated?:D

U have a nice name, bro...:tup:
best part it it becomes a nice name when translated into other languages.


besmartnii in russian, bixiu in chinese, amar in hindi, unsterblich in german and so on.
 
Back
Top Bottom