foxtrot1
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
- Messages
- 581
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
Where are the evidence of self claimed strikes.... None.... Nada.... Because there were no terrorist neither was any strike but an attempt to violate the border, kills PA personnel as much as IA can to satisfy the populace and claim it as a strike to say that URI avenged so the populace bought the idea and here almost everyone from neighbor is repeating the same lines.
That's laughable. You still did not understand why India declared about surgical strikes. Forget the evidence. The evidence of surgical strike is not required because it's of no use. Pakistan Army just want to safeguard it's ego in the eyes of Pakistanis. A country retaliates military if the counterpart makes such claims to teach the lesson. But Pakistan avoided the skirmish.
Rather it was India who escalated and remember two of your soldiers got martyred the same night when surgical strikes took place?
From Indian point of view India wanted a reason to escalate so that rather the tangoes Pakistani regulars and irregulars are raided. Which was achieved.
BTW, speaking of URI, Indian DGMO claimed of Pakistani weapons from forensic though later it was your own official denied the fact of Pakistani weapons at all. NaMO tried to score a political point and prepared all that by involving IA that DGMO itself contradicted with other claims made through Media etc or vice versa. The time has gone and only a proof or evidence can prove it not the copy paste lines. It was the same morning of that so-called strike that Chandu deserted to Pakistan side. CNN also reported the place that India claimed of so-called strikes but still, every other member coming with same thing that has been long before rubbed back.
It does not matter which mark the weapons had. What matters is the tangos were from Pakistan.
The Pakistani response was way way lower than expected. The cross border raids are not so uncommon. In which soldier Chandu was Kidnapped basically as a bargain. These tactics are nothing new.
PA is not hiding behind civilian but IA is targeting civilian to build the pressure like Israeli does in Palestine and come with such claims to justify the crimes. It was your own NaMO that compared IA with Israeli Forces even without realizing that how it is going to affect the name but truth has to come out so it does. IA is only good nowadays to kill innocent civilians and Kashmiris.
During operation Gibraltar the Pak army SSG units with regular soldiers were sent out in casuals to occupy the peaks one cannot differentiate in a city where there are more irregulars than civilians. This was rather exposed by your media only that many ex service men were present in the town to assist pak army.
So this is not trustworthy situation where Indian army can take any chance. It is also possible that there are training grounds in the towns and definitely arty barrage positions which were struck.
On that so-called strike night, IA crossed the border yet hit PA front observing posts but Jawans gave a befitting reply and sacrificed their lives but IA couldn't achieve what it wanted to, by scoring more numbers because we did all the threat assessment on the day of URI that NaMO etc made claims hence, all the watch and Intel was accurate. IA came in and surprise......... No loss is not logical nor practical so we lost couple of Jawans but did you ask your handler about the casualties of IA on that night. There should be bodies of those so-called terrorists that CNN and other media asked the people but none however, India media managed to share an audio conversation between claimed Mujahideen but interestingly, that was one of the hilarious audio in typical Indian accent trying.to be Punjabi or so.... Search all by yourself....
Only an insane military planner will launch a strike where a Pakistani Post has to be encountered first. Your all assessment is wrong.
What happened is Indian army struck in the night. Terminated the tangos and while returning the Pak army resisted and there PA lost two of it's men who were most probably either guarding the launch pads or on patrol.