What's new

India to Deploy Massive Tank Army Along Border With Pakistan

Do you think India is trying to start war with Pakistan?


  • Total voters
    171
Where are the evidence of self claimed strikes.... None.... Nada.... Because there were no terrorist neither was any strike but an attempt to violate the border, kills PA personnel as much as IA can to satisfy the populace and claim it as a strike to say that URI avenged so the populace bought the idea and here almost everyone from neighbor is repeating the same lines.

That's laughable. You still did not understand why India declared about surgical strikes. Forget the evidence. The evidence of surgical strike is not required because it's of no use. Pakistan Army just want to safeguard it's ego in the eyes of Pakistanis. A country retaliates military if the counterpart makes such claims to teach the lesson. But Pakistan avoided the skirmish.
Rather it was India who escalated and remember two of your soldiers got martyred the same night when surgical strikes took place?

From Indian point of view India wanted a reason to escalate so that rather the tangoes Pakistani regulars and irregulars are raided. Which was achieved.

BTW, speaking of URI, Indian DGMO claimed of Pakistani weapons from forensic though later it was your own official denied the fact of Pakistani weapons at all. NaMO tried to score a political point and prepared all that by involving IA that DGMO itself contradicted with other claims made through Media etc or vice versa. The time has gone and only a proof or evidence can prove it not the copy paste lines. It was the same morning of that so-called strike that Chandu deserted to Pakistan side. CNN also reported the place that India claimed of so-called strikes but still, every other member coming with same thing that has been long before rubbed back.

It does not matter which mark the weapons had. What matters is the tangos were from Pakistan.

The Pakistani response was way way lower than expected. The cross border raids are not so uncommon. In which soldier Chandu was Kidnapped basically as a bargain. These tactics are nothing new.
PA is not hiding behind civilian but IA is targeting civilian to build the pressure like Israeli does in Palestine and come with such claims to justify the crimes. It was your own NaMO that compared IA with Israeli Forces even without realizing that how it is going to affect the name but truth has to come out so it does. IA is only good nowadays to kill innocent civilians and Kashmiris.

During operation Gibraltar the Pak army SSG units with regular soldiers were sent out in casuals to occupy the peaks one cannot differentiate in a city where there are more irregulars than civilians. This was rather exposed by your media only that many ex service men were present in the town to assist pak army.

So this is not trustworthy situation where Indian army can take any chance. It is also possible that there are training grounds in the towns and definitely arty barrage positions which were struck.


On that so-called strike night, IA crossed the border yet hit PA front observing posts but Jawans gave a befitting reply and sacrificed their lives but IA couldn't achieve what it wanted to, by scoring more numbers because we did all the threat assessment on the day of URI that NaMO etc made claims hence, all the watch and Intel was accurate. IA came in and surprise......... No loss is not logical nor practical so we lost couple of Jawans but did you ask your handler about the casualties of IA on that night. There should be bodies of those so-called terrorists that CNN and other media asked the people but none however, India media managed to share an audio conversation between claimed Mujahideen but interestingly, that was one of the hilarious audio in typical Indian accent trying.to be Punjabi or so.... Search all by yourself....

Only an insane military planner will launch a strike where a Pakistani Post has to be encountered first. Your all assessment is wrong.

What happened is Indian army struck in the night. Terminated the tangos and while returning the Pak army resisted and there PA lost two of it's men who were most probably either guarding the launch pads or on patrol.
 
well i didn;t say corrupt officers aren't to be expected... but whats to be expected is to bring them for court marshal and not hide them behind the curtains.
this is the problem with you narrow minded indians... you see others as inferior... we do not.

read about abdul hamid... i am neutral on 65s war but have deep respect for men of both sides who put their life in life for their nation.

everyone agrees 65 was a stalemate... for pakistanis... pakistan won! for indians india won. imo there couldn't be a worse fuckup by both sides like that ever again.

saiful well... was grounded and kept as captive... waleed has bengali origin and he too was kept grounded after matiur's defect attempt... waleed after the war chose to have pakistani allegiance and have died since... saiful moved to bangladesh... worked in the airforce until the 80s and retired and still alive... pakistan did try to attack with their f-104 starfighter going around india.. refueling at sri lanka and attacking at bay of bengal... thanks to the russians in much more maneuverable migs... nothing happened. one russian pilot gave his life for our war though.

i am not talking about aerial superiority but aerial dogfight victories.. more indian plane shot down for each of pakistans that got shot down.

and that fear was instilled on them by Maneckshaw like i already said... but had india not asked bd govt to force osmani to hand over the command... the war would have ended with niazi dead on november 30th.

niazi couldn't have killed millions more.. he had men to feed, ammunition ran out... dhaka was on the verge of falling.. it was completely on our terms... but he is lucky tbh... i mean thats the best deal any man will ever get... surrender for your life.
Fear is no policy, surrender is no option. I am pretty sure this surrender scene is engrained into every Pak officer's mind. So, they know exactly what to do - take Dunya away from Ehl-i Dunya if such situations arise. Nothing can strike more terror into their hearts than this till Hazret-i Azrail (AS) shows up....
 
India is threaten us, and we have the retard users trying to tell us to fight Iran Afghanistan and other muslims. We are becoming lost brothers... we need to have eeman.
 
You know what your problem is..you count battles not wars.I will explain you better..

PAK AF was winning more dog fights..Agree..But did it gain air superiority or manage to stop IAF from carrying out attacks on Pak Army?..NO..Hence whats the point of better pilots?

Pak Army was also superior in tank battles..Lets agree for arguments sake..Did they capture Jammu as part of Op grand slam initial thrust..NO..Did they manage to pin down Indian strike corp attacking Lahore..NO..They only managed to hold them till ceasefire.

Now my question to you..What did these superior pilot and tank crew do in 1971?..In the west their entire tank brigade was pinned down by IAF after just 120 men of the 23 Punjab held them all night at Longewala.

In the east they lost tank battles and the IAF bombed the governors house in Dacca.

In the west IN bombed Karachi which burned for 3 days.

Why didnt the superior pilots and tank crew come to the rescue of the nation.

I personally have a lot of respect for mukhti bahini and the bangla people who had to bear the unjust west pak empire.

They punched above their weight in 71 but i wouldnt agree with what Bangladeshis on pdf have to say about 71.Remember without naval blockade,bombardments on dacca,IA reaching dacca and bombing governors house the war would be different.

The USN 7th fleet was not far away.
71 was a total fuckup... they thought 1 of them is equal to 10 of us and the indians... didn't take the war seriously... moral was shit among the men.... became animals and started killing people of their own country... thanks to that faggot bhutto...

you can say they were not prepared for an unconventional war... not even a conventional one... because unlike inida they only care and still do about the military... not their economy.
is that really hard to understand?

Fear is no policy, surrender is no option. I am pretty sure this surrender scene is engrained into every Pak officer's mind. So, they know exactly what to do - take Dunya away from Ehl-i Dunya if such situations arise. Nothing can strike more terror into their hearts than this till Hazret-i Azrail (AS) shows up....
totally irrelevant.
 
71 was a total fuckup... they thought 1 of them is equal to 10 of us and the indians... didn't take the war seriously... moral was shit among the men.... became animals and started killing people of their own country... thanks to that faggot bhutto...

you can say they were not prepared for an unconventional war... not even a conventional one... because unlike inida they only care and still do about the military... not their economy.
is that really hard to understand?


totally irrelevant.
If it were irrelevant how come Pak has put India at bay for the last 3 decades? As for 71 it was thorougjly a Soviet supported expedition and the ground was prepared by proxy traitors since the inception of Pak. It was avenged. How come Mujib and the top traitors were killed by their own men? No Pak folk can match the brutality of killing his minor kid or pregnant daughter-in-law for it's the ramification of unmatched hatred BD Muslims had for him and what he stood for. Top rebel officers who betrayed the Pak army were also mercilessly killed by their own soldiers. Tradition of BD army is to kill officers and rape their wives and daughters. This is just down payment for the million Muhajir men, women and kids these Satanic proxies killed...
 
That's laughable. You still did not understand why India declared about surgical strikes. Forget the evidence. The evidence of surgical strike is not required because it's of no use. Pakistan Army just want to safeguard it's ego in the eyes of Pakistanis. A country retaliates military if the counterpart makes such claims to teach the lesson. But Pakistan avoided the skirmish.
Rather it was India who escalated and remember two of your soldiers got martyred the same night when surgical strikes took place?

From Indian point of view India wanted a reason to escalate so that rather the tangoes Pakistani regulars and irregulars are raided. Which was achieved.

Now coming with Tangos term and back to square one like your first post...... India wanted to escalate but Pakistan this & that... Really. However, it is laughable and many does so because of no evidence but verbal threats and claims and that is what you have been doing here from the start. India did not want to escalate but made a propaganda claim and thrown a bait that we may fall for it but what happened next was totally contrary to the wish of GoI and rubbed all claims. Check media and all and see the contradictions, unlimited contradictions with single so-called strike.


It does not matter which mark the weapons had. What matters is the tangos were from Pakistan.

The Pakistani response was way way lower than expected. The cross border raids are not so uncommon. In which soldier Chandu was Kidnapped basically as a bargain. These tactics are nothing new.

Again Tangos, not a good catch though. Those were your own charlies as preparation for UN and the rest is all selling the beans by NaMO and Company. Chandu was kidnapped???? So an army which soldiers are kidnapped regularly like Kulbushan to Chandu, claims the so-called strike and all that.... Decide first either IA can conduct such strike that couldn't save own soldiers. Give it a rest.


During operation Gibraltar the Pak army SSG units with regular soldiers were sent out in casuals to occupy the peaks one cannot differentiate in a city where there are more irregulars than civilians. This was rather exposed by your media only that many ex service men were present in the town to assist pak army.

So this is not trustworthy situation where Indian army can take any chance. It is also possible that there are training grounds in the towns and definitely arty barrage positions which were struck.

Again referring to further off-topic subjects. However, men sent on mission and civilian living in area are different but such is the comprehension problem from IA to civilian that cannot separate two different things/subjects totally. By that definition, every living person on this side is actually an irregular and threat to India, what a logic but that is far from understanding for non-professionals.


Only an insane military planner will launch a strike where a Pakistani Post has to be encountered first. Your all assessment is wrong.

What happened is Indian army struck in the night. Terminated the tangos and while returning the Pak army resisted and there PA lost two of it's men who were most probably either guarding the launch pads or on patrol.

Again Tangos.... IA crossed the border and tried to score the kills to avenge URI. It is true that we lost 2 of our Jawans, did you bother asking anyone there that how many IA lost contrary to your DM Parikar claim to compare IA with Hanuman so that people wouldn't question the authenticity and capability due to a psych stroke played by him that people bought largely.

You are copy pasting the same lines again & again so I am not asking to agree with me hence, you can agree to disagree and move-on/get over it. Stop quoting me to read the same repeated thing. You are all depending which has been discussed a lot here so no need to tell us that we already heard by many members, Indian Media and GoI, therefore, as there is nothing new, comeback when you have proof in your hands.
 
Khaled, bro...Here is gift for you....

All those who are arguing with Khaled, should know that he will blow your *** apart within no second...

Al Khalid Tank of Pakistan :enjoy:

Modernization+of+Al-Khalid+Main+Battle+Tank+%2528MBT%2529+PAKISTAN+ARMY+I+II.jpg




Then why did you join this "crazy" forum??? :crazy:
just to have a first hand look of how crazy are the people over here.:coffee:

Ok patriotism aside how many people(means people who can differentiate between patriotism and logical thinking) think that this development is a threat to pakistan??
 
Well, Pak is more than prepared. You have made Indian planners' job so easy. When the Indian PM wanted to know the risk assessment after Mumbai fiasco regarding air attack, they put the# b/w 40 and 90% causality rate. The most calculative minds are possessed by the Indian folks, which is apparent from the long queue of the Indian folks in the "return" line in my town's retail stores. So, their decisions are so predicable...
 
Well, Pak is more than prepared. You have made Indian planners' job so easy. When the Indian PM wanted to know the risk assessment after Mumbai fiasco regarding air attack, they put the# b/w 40 and 90% causality rate. The most calculative minds are possessed by the Indian folks, which is apparent from the long queue of the Indian folks in the "return" line in my town's retail stores. So, their decisions are so predicable...
unforutnately for their calculative minds, they have no idea how many DU rounds we have waiting for them and also how far we our reach is. ;)

Lemme just put it this way, I feel sorry for that poor b@st@rd sitting in those tanks; he has no idea what will hit him let along what it will do to him once it hits. The combination of depleted uranium with human flesh is not a pretty picture! :undecided:
 
Back
Top Bottom