India shows off the MKI that Pakistan claimed to have shot down. True?

[Zapper]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1181519453835726849

Not sure why you quoted mine posts or if you have comprehension issues but just reiterate, IAF did not make an official statement and these claims are being made by media outlets and twitter users

 

[xyxmt]

So they only have one MKI !!

 

[Areesh]

The onus of proof to prove that a Sukhoi 30 was downed is on the Pakistanis anyway and they have not provided any proof till date. IAF is not obligated to disprove anything. So if they show us the formation which faced the PAF on Feb 27, we can only take their word for it.

Also, @Areesh

So you admit that today's IAF proof didn't "disprove" PAF claim in any manner

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

So you admit that today's proof didn't "disprove" PAF claim in any manner

It does disprove Pakistani claim but only because Pakistan hasn't provided any proof to support it's claim. Under the current circumstances, in the face of no proof being provided by Pakistan, we have to take IAF's version as the truth when they say that this is the formation which faced PAF on Feb 27.

 

[Areesh]

It does disprove Pakistani claim but only because Pakistan hasn't provided any proof to support it's claim. Under the current circumstances, in the face of no proof being provided by Pakistan, we have to take IAF's version as the truth when they say that this is the formation which faced PAF on Feb 27.

It is no proof. Any MKI can be called as "avenger 1" and presented as such

So it doesn't disprove anything. It isn't even a proof to begin with

Also not to forget IAF didn't share any proof for its claim of shooting down a F16 and same rule of onus applies to that as well

 

[loanranger]

Abhinandan also led a flypast in a MiG-21 today.
Now imagine if he hadn't been shot down in Pakistan ...
The same morons will be claiming that India didn't lose any MiG-21 and it participated in a flypast today.
The very fact, Indians had to show boat with SU-30s from the same unit that lost one on 27th February gives the game away.

That sir was exactly their plan until his blindfolded video and my religion is hindu statement was released.

 

[Zapper]

So you admit that today's IAF proof didn't "disprove" PAF claim in any manner

First up, it's not an official statement by IAF

 

[GHALIB]

21 guns salute to the sense of those who made this stupid claim and 100 guns salute to those who believe in this non sense without thinking.

Whole india is thankful for your gesture.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

It does disprove Pakistani claim but only because Pakistan hasn't provided any proof to support it's claim. Under the current circumstances, in the face of no proof being provided by Pakistan, we have to take IAF's version as the truth when they say that this is the formation which faced PAF on Feb 27.

Even though the iaf hasn't provided any proof for it's claim........

 

[Areesh]

First up, it's not an official statement by IAF

That's a positive

A sign of professionalism by IAF. I appreciate it

 

[Hex0maniac]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1181465007751680000

you guys are gullible.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1181497190943903745

have some latest vedic chooran

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Even before Pakistan could have provided any proof of downing the Su-30, which they never would have since they have no proof, the claim has already been disproved by IAF. Good going.

The same iaf who also claimed to have killed exactly 300 terrorists in Balakot and shot down an F-16...........

 

[dilpakistani]

does indians know there are mostly 18 aircraft in a squardon ?

 

[Dazzler]

Every claim is ruining the credibility of the IAF further, if it had one to begin with. These nonsense claims are hilarious at best. They could have countered PAF's claims in better ways.

Where is the serial number and who was the pilot? What if the PAF released clippings of the radio communication? That would be a major embarrassment. The IAF should actually be thankful that none has been released thus far.

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

It is no proof. Any MKI can be called as "avenger 1" and presented as such

So it doesn't disprove anything. It isn't even a proof to begin with

Also not to forget IAF didn't share any proof for its claim of shooting down a F16 and same rule of onus applies to that as well

I don't consider the F-16 to be a kill.