What's new

India rightfully enjoys high authority in world: Dmitry Medvedev

You're not even a permanent member of the UNSC, whereas little countries like France & the UK are. That's pretty shameful. BRICS is nothing really but an abbreviation/acronym coined by Jim O'Neill in 2001. BRICS has exactly the same meaning as the N-11 countries do, which Pakistan is a part of of course:

Next Eleven - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In the N-11 Pakistan has the most slow economic growth rate.
While the BRIC(S not mainly) is represented world wide.
 
.
India said no to IPI because it has P in it. Doesn't hurt to go beyond Pakistani propaganda. India would never build a pipeline that goes through Pakistan. Undersea pipeline was just too damn costly. US offer came much much later. India had expressed concern way before Bush came to India.

India buys so much energy from Iran. And it will continue to do so in future. But lets be illogical.

But the fact that India hadn't made payments to Iran, which almost resulted in Iran closing their oil supply to India, didn't have anything to do with Pakistan, did it?

---------- Post added at 08:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:41 PM ----------

In the N-11 Pakistan has the most slow economic growth rate.
While the BRIC(S not mainly) is represented world wide.

Lol don't teach me that who's in next 11 .Wikipedia should be kept out of the way man.BRICS is just an acronym given by goldman sach for 5 largest emerging economy which is now much more formally used in WTO meeting or G 20.

Again harping about the BRICs are if it has some authority :rofl:
 
.
Likewise, N-11 is an acronym given by Goldman Sachs for the next 11 largest economies in the world after the BRICS. There is no difference between the significance of BRICS & N-11, because as CardSharp has already mentioned, it is an investment theme, not a political body. The fact that you have the second largest population in the world, one of the largest countries in the world by land; your economy is 1/4th the size of China & nearly 1/10th of that of the US, along with the fact that you are not even a permanent member of the UNSC, which is shameful for a country like India.

Shameful? Do you feel shame over having smaller GDP than South Korea or even HK? India is a poor, third world country. 11 years ago, Indian GDP was 500 billion USD. Now it is poised to cross 2 trillion by 2012. Permanent membership of UNSC has nothing to do with being big. World's biggest and richest economics like Japan or Germany are not part of it due to historic reason and for precisely that reason, China which was actually poorer than India till 1970s, is. Not sure how any of this matters. Japan has huge influence over world and it doesn't have so called "offensive" force let alone permanent seat anywhere. Money is the true power, not silly nukes or permanent seat.
 
.
But the fact that India hadn't made payments to Iran, which almost resulted in Iran closing their oil supply to India, didn't have anything to do with Pakistan, did it?



Trolling pays well it seems. You have been reported.
 
.
Lol don't teach me that who's in next 11 .Wikipedia should be kept out of the way man.BRICS is just an acronym given by goldman sach for 5 largest emerging economy which is now much more formally used in WTO meeting or G 20.
Check the stats before you make something by your own.
IMF World Economic Outlook (WEO) Update -- Mild Slowdown of the Global Expansion, and Increasing Risks, June 2011

Again, why are you going after projections? They are nothing but baseless assumptions. The projections for the US's GDP growth rate for 2011 was at 4%, but in the first seven months, there has only been a growth rate of 0.7%.
 
.
No Pakistani believes in the N-11 or the BRICS, &you never hear Pakistanis harp around the N-11 like Indians do about the BRICs, as if it is some kind of political body or something of authority.

The true test of importance is when you can say that an organization is important because it has your country in it, not the other way around.

For example, America is not powerful because it's in NATO. NATO is powerful because it has America.
 
.
The true test of importance is when you can say that an organization is important because it has your country in it, not the other way around.

For example, America is not powerful because it's in NATO. NATO is powerful because it has America.

It works both ways though.
 
.
It works both ways though.

Only to a small extent.

Take another example. Imagine if each of the UNSC permanent members were expelled from the UNSC. What would happen?

The US could immediately form another rival organization to UN and the UN would become irrelevant. None of the other UNSC members have that capability, although China would probably be able to do it in another decade.
 
.
who heard about N-11 ?? why are pakisatni crying over N-11..N-11 lose its voice with members like Pakistan and bangladesh who at the same time happen to be in failed state list

N-11 is basically of the same significance as the BRICs is. Don't know why the Indians get so excited by an acronym proposed by Goldman Sachs, which itself is in pretty deep ***t these days here in the US.
 
.
What's odd about the Russian-Hind relationship is that from what I understand many Russians hate Hindustanis, if you think Australia is bad you should see Russia they will attack Hindustani students without hesitation.

Russia has a high corruption and crime rate, chum. Not even their own live long enough unlike Europe and Americas.. Besides, you got supremacists there as well. We know it.

So the Russian people, the commoner and the right-wing hate/dislike Hindustanis but Czar Medvedev is interested in expanding business ties with Hindustan. That is good for Hindustan. Though it's interesting how they work around the hatred and racism common Russians have for who they see as "dark" Hindustanis...

The common Russian is not a right wing, just like a common Pakistani is not a taliban. The Swiss couple got kidnapped the American expat just got bagged, does it mean common Pakistanis hate Whites? I don't think so. My dad is Russian educated. Trust me, except goons and neo-nazis, your common Russian couldn't care less about how we look. Most know that Indian students are common in Russia.

With attacks on Indian students in Australia, that caused strains in Hinds ties with Australia but attacks against Indian students in Russia seem to be completely ignored. I just find this Indian Russian relationship interesting.

Who said? There was an uproar here about the neo-nazi attacks. Russian universities have increased security and there are special advisories for some students that are near to sensitive skinhead areas. Usually, these skinhead idiots are there in St. Petersburg and some areas of Moscow. But in other places not so much.
 
.
who heard about N-11 ?? why are pakisatni crying over N-11..N-11 lose its voice with members like Pakistan and bangladesh who at the same time happen to be in failed state list

India is just as much of a failed state. What can you expect from a country that holds 1/3rd of the whole world's poor, & has more poor people in its 8 states than of all the African countries combined?
 
. .
Only to a small extent.

Take another example. Imagine if each of the UNSC permanent members were expelled from the UNSC. What would happen?

The US could immediately form another rival organization to UN and the UN would become irrelevant. None of the other UNSC members have that capability, although China would probably be able to do it in another decade.

No , 'almighty' China won't be able to replace USA in 2020 in terms of national power . That will take decades . just being realistic . But there is no harm in wishing .
 
.
India is just as much of a failed state. What can you expect from a country that holds 1/3rd of the whole world's poor, & has more poor people in its 8 states than of all the African countries combined?

Yes, we are as failed as Pakistan. Lets not discuss it anymore.
 
.
Only to a small extent.

Take another example. Imagine if each of the UNSC permanent members were expelled from the UNSC. What would happen?

The US could immediately form another rival organization to UN and the UN would become irrelevant. None of the other UNSC members have that capability, although China would probably be able to do it in another decade.

Conversely, imagine the opposite scenario. What would happen to the US military operations all over the world without the support, & more significantly, the resources of the NATO?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom