What's new

India provides money, targets to terrorists in Pak: Terrorist claims on video

Saffron brainwashing at its best. No, because no one in Pakistan today even knows what Balwaristan or Sindhudesh is, & Pashtunistan is not even a real movement, even though some people might have heard its name. Tell me who is currently spearheading the Pashtunistan movement? NO ONE!!! That's not the case in India though.


Well it seemed like you knew about it :azn:
So looks like buffoonery is reaching an all time high. Yeah, about 10 people out of the millions want to separate. That means we have separatist movements?

Guess what, I also freedom movements and freedom fighters in Punjab, Kashmir, North East Indian states, Tamil Nadu, etc

Haha too bad they're pretty much dead.. As for the insurgency in Kashmir which is being backed by pakistan.. it's only a matter of time where it ends just like the khalistan movement.

Don't forget us NRIs. We want our own separate state too!

:rofl:


Yeah bro Americadesh! Canada is another Punjab and so is London :rofl:
 
.
uhh they migrated there from south hindustan, they arent indigenous

Tamil history in Lanka predates Sinhala history. Sinhalese by some theory are from Kalinga(present day Orissa). Only the Tamil tea plantation workers of the hills are recent migrants during the British era. Any way, if they are recent migrants, they don't deserve rights?
 
.
Yeah bro Americadesh! Canada is another Punjab and so is London

Yes, they flock like birds into other countries, even in places they aren't really 'wanted' & feel discriminated (Australia). They escape from India to other countries like refugees, but still think India is the greatest country in the world... :rofl:
 
. .
Haha too bad they're pretty much dead.. As for the insurgency in Kashmir which is being backed by pakistan.. it's only a matter of time where it ends just like the khalistan movement.

That's my point. So how strong exactly are the separatist movements that you talked about in Pakistan? To call them separatist movements would be a shame.
 
.
As far as gilgit is concerned there was an article explaining what's goin on there in the Kashmir section. Your army pretty much kills who dares speak against them.

This is what happens when Indians eat too much curry, & listen to the Indian media all the time. They become delusional. You know that the Gilgit-Baltistan region is separate from Kashmir, right? The people from Skardu have no links to the people of Muzaffarabad, Srinagar or Mirpur etc. Gilgit-Baltistan is the 5th province of Pakistan. The people from Gilgit-Baltistan have no cultural, ethnic links with the people of Kashmir. Azad Kashmir (which Indians refer to as ) is an autonomous region that is not governed by the Pakistan government. Indian occupied Kashmir is disputed territory.
 
.
Well just look at the situation in Balochistan... cheering for the opposing team? What happened to this "ummah"?

As far as gilgit is concerned there was an article explaining what's goin on there in the Kashmir section. Your army pretty much kills who dares speak against them.

Balochistan insurgency is no-where as big as some of the insurgencies in India, such as Kashmir or Maoists. There might be a few wanting separatism, but by enlarge it's a few who want to exploit the circumstances for their own reasons.

Baloch celebrating victory? So a small number of people in Balochistan do that and that means whole of Balochistan is doing it? All Indians muslims celebrate Pakistan's victories too then?

In Gilgit there's nothing happening. No separatist movement. So what about Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Kashmir, Nagaland, Tripura

Edit: My bad, Maoists want to overthrow Indian government, not separate. Still, an insurgency nonetheless.
 
.
Btw, let's not make diversions from the main topic.
 
.
We need to accelerate diplomatic and moral support to Moaists in all 19 Indian States. Even we have to stop a development project to fund them, that should be done on a fast track.
 
.
We need to accelerate diplomatic and moral support to Moaists in all 19 Indian States. Even we have to stop a development project to fund them, that should be done on a fast track.

Yes, please go ahead. Stop trying to restore your country, stop battling the ingrown radicalism, stop focusing on everything your country was created for and then feel free to support the Maoists. You guys have a lot of free time and resources it looks like.
 
.
Yes, but you did not manage to:

(01) Reduce the poverty for 440,000,000 million Indians living the poverty line.

It's 440 million according to the poverty line India set, which is 500 rupees a month. The international poverty line is set at $1 a day, set by the World Bank. More than 800 million Indians live below $2 a day, & over 600 million Indians live below $1 a day. More than 750 million Indians have no access to toilets.
 
.
It's 440 million according to the poverty line India set, which is 500 rupees a month. The international poverty line is set at $1 a day, set by the World Bank. More than 800 million Indians live below $2 a day, & over 600 million Indians live below $1 a day. More than 750 million Indians have no access to toilets.

Despite all the causes, India currently adds 40 million people to its middle class every year. Analysts such as the founder of "Forecasting International", Marvin J. Cetron writes that an estimated 300 million Indians now belong to the middle class; one-third of them have emerged from poverty in the last ten years. At the current rate of growth, a majority of Indians will be middle-class by 2025. Literacy rates have risen from 52 percent to 65 percent in the same period.
 
. . .
Despite all the causes, India currently adds 40 million people to its middle class every year. Analysts such as the founder of "Forecasting International", Marvin J. Cetron writes that an estimated 300 million Indians now belong to the middle class; one-third of them have emerged from poverty in the last ten years. At the current rate of growth, a majority of Indians will be middle-class by 2025. Literacy rates have risen from 52 percent to 65 percent in the same period.

Myths perpetrated by the Indian media. Let me quote you some statistical evidence from all the past years.

India:

BPL_Data_GOI.png


Pakistan:

Trends_in_Poverty_-_1999_to_2008.jpg


Pakistan's poverty in 2008: 17.2%

India's poverty in 2000: 26.1% (from the graph)

India's poverty in 2004: 27.5% (from the link)

India's poverty in 2010 (after the economic boom): 37.2% (from the link)

Pakistan's poverty has gone down, India's poverty has gone up. India's poverty rate is twice of that of Pakistan.

100 million more Indians now living in poverty - The Economic Times
 
.
Back
Top Bottom