Dash
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2009
- Messages
- 6,652
- Reaction score
- -14
- Country
- Location
I have always been a beleiver of "One mans terrorist is other man's freedom fighter"
So what is the argument?
A life lost is a life lost sir.
There are threads about this very thing, who soldiers don't hate other soldiers and other things. Frankly, what i have deduced from my friends in military, they do not hate the Indian soldiers but the do hate the TTP goons. Something to do with professionalism i suppose.
The first 8 words are the key, for me, this is what is being tried by India. For you it will be other way around. As i said, i wont expect nothing less from a patriotic India but you can deny what is a fact from our perspective. In fact, you may try and deny it but that wont matter to us, i hope you understand.
Again sir, who is misguided here will always remain a debate that wont have any winners. For them/us/me, the whole issue is that this beautiful place is under occupation. Again, agree to disagree as this is something we have fought wars on so do not expect that it will resolve itself. With no serious effort to do so, the problem will remain the same for some time whether we chose to accept it or not.
If he is involved in a serious sensible debate, at least do not poke him and bring him to the same level as yourself sir. Just a request.
That sentence there one man's terrorist is a true definition of a terrorist. It's always some man's terrorist. Who acts at the behest of flawed design of an evil man and a vested interest.
Terrorism is always inflicted upon as a weapon of destruction. In practical sense the person responsible for creating terror and terrorist is driven by wrong agenda and non of the people we see in Kashmir or supporter from our neighborhood is a saint. They feed misinformation and boil tension to a problem they feel couldn't achive their personal objective.