samv
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 3,059
- Reaction score
- -24
Defend it all you like. The fact is they were brought in to put a check on Christians.Yeah maybe these "missionaries" should stop alluring illiterate people into converting to their "religion". Once again there is nothing discriminatory about the law. If I Hindu tries to force a Muslim to convert the same law applies to him too. Thats fair and secular for us.
Instead of persecuting and discriminating against low caste Hindus (who then convert to Christianity), Hindu groups should convert on improving the lot of the less fortunate Hindus.
Anti-conversion laws a laughable attempt to legislate religious belief.
If people want to convert for money that should be their choice.
Yeah yeah of course it was. US congressmen obviously don't have any power over Sri Lanka. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
Yes the congressman called up Sri Lanka's Supreme Court the night before.
Yes there are Buddhist extremists in Sri Lanka - like there are Hindu extremists in India.
But Sri Lanka has no anti-conversion laws that discriminate against Christians, unlike in "secular" India. In other words, the Buddhist right were defeated by the law in Sri Lanka while in India the Hindu right won the right to target Christians through legislation.
And Christians in Sri Lanka (7% of the population) have faced no massive targeted attacks on the scale that the 2% Christian minority in India has at the hands of Hindus:
Last edited by a moderator: