India Contemplates Anti-Satellite Vehicle Integration with Agni-III Ballistic Missile

[amitkriit]

Are you on crack? It is not about the total percentage, heck it's not even about the trade-deficit. It's about your argument that China would come to India's aid in the case of a limited nuclear strike by Pakistan. You are as clueless as a bag of kittens. Buzz off.

Indian Armed Forces are capable enough to counter any external aggression. We are self-sufficient.

 

[Gessler]

Are you on crack? It is not about the total percentage, heck it's not even about the trade-deficit. It's about your argument that China would come to India's aid in the case of a limited nuclear strike by Pakistan.

When on freaking earth did I say that? What I said was, in case of nuclear conflict, China will refuse to
provide military-related assistance to Pakistan. Infact ANY country will refuse to provide assistance if
you are are the first-use aggressor, and especially if the assistance is aimed against a member of the Nuclear
Suppliers Group which could even become permanent member of UNSC soon....and one with which China
itself shares massive economic relations & interests, besides being one of world's largest economies.

You are as clueless as a bag of kittens.

And you're as dumb as a bag of hammers.

There is a friendship treaty between China & Pakistan, it is more than what you had with Russia during 70s, can't say more than that as it is not much public.

No friendship treaty in the world speaks about assisting/defending a nuclear aggressor. All treaties are rendered
invalid once UN or some other body holds you responsible for initiating nuclear war.

They threw a motherload of sanctions on you for just testing a nuclear weapon, imagine what is in store if you
actually use it against someone? You are living in a fool's paradise.

 

[VelocuR]

This is one of the reason that US permit India to develop ASAT after China obviously got that technology since they were able to track and hit their satellite in 2007.

You remember US Navy Cruiser shot down old weather satellite.

I have read some old arguments from Nuclear experts saying - Pakistan does have the potential to develop ASAT technology of its own if needed.

 

[Contrarian]

This is one of the reason that US permit India to develop ASAT after China obviously got that technology since they were able to track and hit their satellite in 2007.

You remember US Navy Cruiser shot down old weather satellite.

India does not need US permit to develop anything. Our development of weapons and technology is based on our requirements.
India's missile technology has made development of ASAT possible coupled with Indian space program's technology.

 

[VelocuR]

India does not need US permit to develop anything. Our development of weapons and technology is based on our requirements.
India's missile technology has made development of ASAT possible coupled with Indian space program's technology.

Having US support is to allow India to develop ASAT, no secret.

 

[amitkriit]

Having US support is to allow India to develop ASAT, no secret.

US also allowed Dinosaurs to get destroyed by an asteroid. The US is so cunning.

 

[Gessler]

This is one of the reason that US permit India to develop ASAT after China obviously got that technology since they were able to track and hit their satellite in 2007.

You remember US Navy Cruiser shot down old weather satellite.

I have read some old arguments from Nuclear experts saying - Pakistan does have the potential to develop ASAT technology of its own if needed.

Is there any weapon/technology in the world which Pakistan does not have the potential to develop?

It is interesting to see how Pak claims to have the potential to develop while the actual developers (US & China/Russia) achieve it after
decades of research & billions of dollars in investment & production.

 

[Mitro]

if you are the one who still think that some bedouin from arabia came and destroy the twin tower then good luck for that and will be regretting in the future of the stupidity.killing innocent civilian and thinking that US won the war then why still there is no peace and prosperity in those country after making US bank corrupt and making life miserable for its own citizen.
and destroying their reputation of undefeated superpower which cannot destroy its enemy with all the modern weapon system , which like ghost keep on coming back and haunting them.
if india just declare war on pakistan see what will happen to indian economy .on the other hand pakistan is already in war state .so who is going to lose.

US mainland did not suffer any major terrorist attacks after 9/11. Afghanistan lost hundreds of thousands of men, while US lost trillions of dollars (off course money matters more than Human life). US hunted down Bin Laden and all other conspirators of 9/11 and other attacks against US interests. US drones fly over foreign territories killing foreign nationals (not Americans), so what? US is still a developed nation, Afghanistan and Pakistan haven't changed much either.

Sure it was completely a America's defeat and you aren't off-topic at all. Also, unlike Pakistan, Indians will have serious difference of opinion over almost EVERYTHING during a war. How did I fail to take this factor into consideration? My bad.

does not the same argument apply to india?
which keep investing in R&D and still after so many fail attempt still import every thing from foreign country.

Is there any weapon/technology in the world which Pakistan does not have the potential to develop?

It is interesting to see how Pak claims to have the potential to develop while the actual developers (US & China/Russia) achieve it after
decades of research & billions of dollars in investment & production.

 

[Contrarian]

Having US support is to allow India to develop ASAT, no secret.

You are free to think of your conspiracy theories.
If anything, US has tried its utmost to deny India access to global space technology. Ban on many technologies has cost India decades of developmental effort.

We have overcome many obstacles to develop our tech, and is the reason why we donot need US permission or blessings to go ahead with what we want.

 

[TheFlyingPretzel]

When on freaking earth did I say that? What I said was, in case of nuclear conflict, China will refuse to
provide military-related assistance to Pakistan. Infact ANY country will refuse to provide assistance if
you are are the first-use aggressor, and especially if the assistance is aimed against a member of the Nuclear
Suppliers Group which could even become permanent member of UNSC soon....and one with which China
itself shares massive economic relations & interests, besides being one of world's largest economies.
.

Lol. You are a certified idiot. There is no truth to the argument that "ANY country will refuse to provide assistance if
you are are the first-use aggressor" because it is absolute baloney. Where were you when they were teaching us alliances and international relations in the world-history class.

Also, India is not a member of the Nuclear Suppliers group! Even if it were it would not get any special privileges from China in the wake of an attack by Pakistan. There have not been, and in the foreseeable future will not be, any new inductions to the permanent members of the UNSC. It's constitution has remained unchanged since its creation almost 70 years ago!

Your final argument is that China will save India because India is one of the world's largest economies. Lol. Listen to yourself!

 

[amitkriit]

if you are the one who still think that some bedouin from arabia came and destroy the twin tower then good luck for that and will be regretting in the future of the stupidity.killing innocent civilian and thinking that US won the war then why still there is no peace and prosperity in those country after making US bank corrupt and making life miserable for its own citizen.
and destroying their reputation of undefeated superpower which cannot destroy its enemy with all the modern weapon system , which like ghost keep on coming back and haunting them.
if india just declare war on pakistan see what will happen to indian economy .on the other hand pakistan is already in war state .so who is going to lose.

I thought that the US invaded those countries to ensure peace and prosperity in the US mainland, I didn't know that the goal was to export "peace and prosperity" to the Middle East.

The ghosts seem to be haunting their neighbours these days (see Iraq for example). They no longer want to go to America to haunt American people.

 

[Gessler]

Lol. You are a certified idiot. There is no truth to the argument that "ANY country will refuse to provide assistance if
you are are the first-use aggressor" because it is absolute baloney. Where were you when they were teaching us alliances and international relations in the world-history class.

Also, India is not a member of the Nuclear Suppliers group! Even if it were it would not get any special privileges from China in the wake of an attack by Pakistan. There have not been, and in the foreseeable future will not be, any new inductions to the permanent members of the UNSC. It's constitution has remained unchanged since its creation almost 70 years ago!

Your final argument is that China will save India because India is one of the world's largest economies. Lol. Listen to yourself!

In the delusional world where you live in, the whole world will help Pakistan to fight with India.

I admit defeat!

 

[Mitro]

In most western society peace and prosperity depends on money so by spending trillion's of dollar making itself bank corrupt and making life harder for its on citizen .in future US will be not able to give benefit to millions and world will see the mayhem it never saw that people will became savages and do things unimaginable .right now the crime rate is high and people are not able to afford decent living forget about American dream.
see the hypocrisy of west in one country they are freedom fighter train by US special forces and on other hand they are terrorist fighting with iraqi government with American weapon.
the so call islamic extremist are US Proxy to destroy nation to make its ally israhell to wage a big war .

I thought that the US invaded those countries to ensure peace and prosperity in the US mainland, I didn't know that the goal was to export "peace and prosperity" to the Middle East.

The ghosts seem to be haunting their neighbours these days (see Iraq for example). They no longer want to go to America to haunt American people.

 

[TheFlyingPretzel]

Also, India is not a member of the Nuclear Suppliers group!

In the delusional world where you live in, the whole world will help Pakistan to fight with India.

I admit defeat!

Let me bring you upto speed with my world.

The Current Participating Governments (PGs) of the NSG are:
ARGENTINA, AUSTRALIA, AUSTRIA, BELARUS, BELGIUM, BRAZIL, BULGARIA, CANADA, CHINA, CROATIA, CYPRUS, CZECH REPUBLIC, DENMARK, ESTONIA, FINLAND, FRANCE, GERMANY, GREECE, HUNGARY, ICELAND, IRELAND, ITALY, JAPAN, KAZAKHSTAN, REPUBLIC OF KOREA, LATVIA, LITHUANIA, LUXEMBOURG, MALTA, MEXICO, NETHERLANDS, NEW ZEALAND, NORWAY, POLAND, PORTUGAL, ROMANIA, RUSSIAN FEDERATION, SERBIA, SLOVAKIA, SLOVENIA, SOUTH AFRICA, SPAIN, SWEDEN, SWITZERLAND, TURKEY, UKRAINE, UNITED KINGDOM, and UNITED STATES

2014/2015 NSG Chair Country: Argentina

The European Commission and the Chair of the Zangger Committee participate as observers.

ON WHAT BASIS ARE PARTICIPATION DECISIONS TAKEN?
Factors taken into account for participation include the following:

• The ability to supply items (including items in transit) covered by the Annexes to Parts 1 and 2 of the NSG Guidelines;
• Adherence to the Guidelines and action in accordance with them;
• Enforcement of a legally based domestic export control system which gives effect to the commitment to act in accordance with the Guidelines;
• Adherence to one or more of the NPT, the Treaties of Pelindaba, Rarotonga, Tlatelolco, Bangkok , Semipalatinsk or an equivalent international nuclear non-proliferation agreement, and full compliance with the obligations of such agreement(s);
• Support of international efforts towards non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and of their delivery vehicles.

FaLang translation system by Faboba

Nuclear Suppliers Group - Participants

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/06/opinion/sunday/indias-role-in-the-nuclear-race.html

An article from Yesterday (considering it's still the 6th of July in NY).

Welcome to my world, welcome to reality.

 

[Gessler]

Let me bring you upto speed with my world.

The Current Participating Governments (PGs) of the NSG are:
ARGENTINA, AUSTRALIA, AUSTRIA, BELARUS, BELGIUM, BRAZIL, BULGARIA, CANADA, CHINA, CROATIA, CYPRUS, CZECH REPUBLIC, DENMARK, ESTONIA, FINLAND, FRANCE, GERMANY, GREECE, HUNGARY, ICELAND, IRELAND, ITALY, JAPAN, KAZAKHSTAN, REPUBLIC OF KOREA, LATVIA, LITHUANIA, LUXEMBOURG, MALTA, MEXICO, NETHERLANDS, NEW ZEALAND, NORWAY, POLAND, PORTUGAL, ROMANIA, RUSSIAN FEDERATION, SERBIA, SLOVAKIA, SLOVENIA, SOUTH AFRICA, SPAIN, SWEDEN, SWITZERLAND, TURKEY, UKRAINE, UNITED KINGDOM, and UNITED STATES

​

2014/2015 NSG Chair Country: Argentina

The European Commission and the Chair of the Zangger Committee participate as observers.

ON WHAT BASIS ARE PARTICIPATION DECISIONS TAKEN?
Factors taken into account for participation include the following:

• 
  
  
  • The ability to supply items (including items in transit) covered by the Annexes to Parts 1 and 2 of the NSG Guidelines;
  • Adherence to the Guidelines and action in accordance with them;
  • Enforcement of a legally based domestic export control system which gives effect to the commitment to act in accordance with the Guidelines;
  • Adherence to one or more of the NPT, the Treaties of Pelindaba, Rarotonga, Tlatelolco, Bangkok , Semipalatinsk or an equivalent international nuclear non-proliferation agreement, and full compliance with the obligations of such agreement(s);
  • Support of international efforts towards non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and of their delivery vehicles.

FaLang translation system by Faboba

Nuclear Suppliers Group - Participants

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/06/opinion/sunday/indias-role-in-the-nuclear-race.html

An article from Yesterday (considering it's still the 6th of July in NY).

Welcome to my world, welcome to reality.

You will keep harping while we get both NSG and UNSC permanent membership. In the years down the line, both
of those groups would be a joke without India.