What's new

India Contemplates Anti-Satellite Vehicle Integration with Agni-III Ballistic Missile

why all these halla gulla just to knock out satellite .Future weapon to kill satellite will be laser and china already prove the world how to disable satellite for temporary and they know how to burn the sensor in real time .no flying debries in space .
if india can develop SKV it will be operational around decade ,the world have moved on with new weapons like laser and hypersonic cruise missile which will be very hard to intercept.
 
.
Name one system that we've bought from China that can't be used against India ?

Yup, keep that list in your brain, thats your answer.

@Gessler

Pakistan is going to lose a conventional war against India in a 'few hours' or 'days' according to who?

Any Chinese asset which might potentially get used by Pakistan against India will become a genuine target.

According to 1999 when the Pakistani PM "officially" ran to the US for some unknown reason.
 
.
According to 1999 when the Pakistani PM ran to the US for some unknown reason.

I thought he flew there to eat some dal curry.

why all these halla gulla just to knock out satellite .Future weapon to kill satellite will be laser and china already prove the world how to disable satellite for temporary and they know how to burn the sensor in real time .no flying debries in space .
if india can develop SKV it will be operational around decade ,the world have moved on with new weapons like laser and hypersonic cruise missile which will be very hard to intercept.


Direct energy weapons will become the mainstay for future combat including frying sats.
 
.
Have funny when pakistan manufacture all the ammunition and most of their system are smartly develop with collaboration and india is still importing most of their requirement so who has more capacity and wage and sustain the war for long time .
just take kargil for example indian army was out of stock of ammunition so their israhell friend has to interfer and help in ammunition and laser guided kits what a shame.

Pakistan does not have capacity to have full fledged war with India. India has to just take care of terrorists.

These tech. is for China centric since they have already
 
.
Any Chinese asset which might potentially get used by Pakistan against India will become a genuine target.

According to 1999 when the Pakistani PM "officially" ran to the US for some unknown reason.

Your falsehood is stupendous. Every weapon we've bought from China or US has India's name on it. They have been in the past and will be in the future be used to defend against India and there's nothing India can do in this regard.
 
.
Have funny when pakistan manufacture all the ammunition and most of their system are smartly develop with collaboration and india is still importing most of their requirement so who has more capacity and wage and sustain the war for long time .
just take kargil for example indian army was out of stock of ammunition so their israhell friend has to interfer and help in ammunition and laser guided kits what a shame.

Still India managed to send the Pakistani PM into the White House. What a shame.
BTW, ammunition from Israel was purchased using hard cash, not sent to India as loan or grant. What a shame.
 
.
Some Indian don't understand when China can shutup US after Osama raid they will not interfer when india is winning the war with pakistan or helping pakistan with what ever they need in crisis.
or even open a new front in northeast and make india fight two front war.
 
.
Your falsehood is stupendous. Every weapon we've bought from China or US has India's name on it. They have been in the past and will be in the future be used to defend against India and there's nothing India can do in this regard.

I think you did not understand my comment. Any foreign system (doesn't matter which country owns/operates it) which will be used against India by an aggressor will become a legitimate target and will be taken out by our forces. There is nothing Pakistan can do in this regard.

Some Indian don't understand when China can shutup US after Osama raid they will not interfer when india is winning the war with pakistan or helping pakistan with what ever they need in crisis.
or even open a new front in northeast and make india fight two front war.

So you "officially" accept that Pakistan doesn't have a chance against India if China betrays Pakistan.
 
.
Shame is not making themself ready for this small war how can a shane person think that they will be ready to fight all out war.
In pakistan if general goes running to white house then its big deal not PM .

Still India managed to send the Pakistani PM into the White House. What a shame.
BTW, ammunition from Israel was purchased using hard cash, not sent to India as loan or grant. What a shame.
 
.
Shame is not making themself ready for this small war how can a shane person think that they will be ready to fight all out war.
In pakistan if general goes running to white house then its big deal not PM .

Oh I forgot the fact that Generals and not the PM run Pakistan. Thanks for correcting me.
 
.
I think you did not understand my comment. Any foreign system (doesn't matter which country owns/operates it) which will be used against India by an aggressor will become a legitimate target and will be taken out by our forces. There is nothing Pakistan can do in this regard.

Goodluck with applying that theory to the Chinese COMPASS. You attack their sats, they'll take it as a declaration of war leading to a two front war you Swami juniors have a fetish for.
 
.
Camparing the size and resources pakistan is doing some thing good and able to hold on to itself after war ,indian planner or army is so incompetant that they where not able to take back Azad Kashmir after fighting so many war shame on them .
Pakistan is capable in defending herself in conventional or nuclear war and imaging 90 % of pakistani population is arm to the tooth so how can a army fight with the population in every street.
its not possible with indian economy. it will destroy india as a whole country then it will be many small india.

So you "officially" accept that Pakistan doesn't have a chance against India if China betrays Pakistan.
 
.
Goodluck with applying that theory to the Chinese COMPASS. You attack their sats, they'll take it as a declaration of war leading to a two front war you Swami juniors have a fetish for.

I am sure there will be players which might jump in and make it more interesting than what you have been describing.

Camparing the size and resources pakistan is doing some thing good and able to hold on to itself after war ,indian planner or army is so incompetant that they where not able to take back Azad Kashmir after fighting so many war shame on them .
Pakistan is capable in defending herself in conventional or nuclear war and imaging 90 % of pakistani population is arm to the tooth so how can a army fight with the population in every street.
its not possible with indian economy. it will destroy india as a whole country then it will be many small india.

You are right there is not much left inside Pakistan to "Destroy". India will be taking a huge risk.
 
.
.
Your falsehood is stupendous. Every weapon we've bought from China or US has India's name on it. They have been in the past and will be in the future be used to defend against India and there's nothing India can do in this regard.

Using the weapons bought from a foreign country beforehand doesn't equate with using satellites(or any system for that matter) of foreign country during the time of war as in weapons case supplier countries can't do much to stop their weapons being used by buyers and hence can't be held responsible for any of the damages caused to another country while if a foreign country intentionally allow its system to be used by another country engaged in a war then that system becomes a legitimate target for the other side to hamper their enemy's war efforts. When the threat posed by a system is huge and if foreign country still allows their system being used then in some cases that foreign country itself becomes a party the conflict.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom