What's new

India and Pakistan Are Edging Closer to War in 2020

Alright! Lets hear it from you, what was that agreement? Was it the same that Jina stated?



Was this the agreement?

Typical, very well versed in made up vedic history but doesn't know real history.

Nehru agreed to Muslim areas going to Pakistan when he agreed to the existence of Pakistan.

so lets see how you use mental gymnastics on this one.

BTW, still waiting for a resonance on why you don't fly your Indian flag

And why you don't consider the democratic aspiration of Kashmiries?

You know you are on the wrong side of history when you have to make up such nonsense while ignoring the heart of the matter/people.
 
.
On a serious note, India and Pakistan are both are just fooling their people....BJP will just do small LOC incidents and pretend as if fighting a war with Pakistan...And Pakistan will always have an excuse of the economy and will never initiate war...Now, in this scenario, why do you think any full-blown war will happen in the next 20 years?

Anyway, i do not want to put water on the enthusiasm of the OP to see any war happening in the coming days. But the ground reality is different....In next 4 year, Modi will be out of power. There will be another Non BJP Gov will come to power in India and they will do the same goodie goodie thing as it was done in last 70 year with respect to Pakistan...Then people will be busy in their regular life and start watching cricket matches in our homes. This is the ground reality of India Pakistan relation.

If u really think that? Dont u learn fron 27 feb incident? CAA laws, annexation of Kashmir ?

The war is not happening as Pakistani side is playing sane and telling all of the folks that war is not an option between 2 nuclear states. Otherwise look at your think tanks ... alot of them are suggesting this as a bluff from Pakistani side and are pushing to call off that bluff ... it needs one insane general or PM defence minister.

Take an example of 27th feb. Had Pakistan not initiated the cool down process we were almost at the start of war
 
.
Nehru agreed to Muslim areas going to Pakistan when he agreed to the existence of Pakistan.
And what about Hindu areas? What was agreed about them? Also duly note that Jinnah own words on Junagar were these :

after the lapse of paramountcy, every Indian state is independent and sovereign and free to join Pakistan or India Dominion.



BTW, still waiting for a resonance on why you don't fly your Indian flag
Because I am not Indian. Neither by birth, nor any other way. Is it really that hard to understand?


And why you don't consider the democratic aspiration of Kashmiries?
Lets stick to one point at a time, shall we? Lets first see what was the agreement between India and Pakistan back then, as understood by you.
 
.
And what about Hindu areas? What was agreed about them? Also duly note that Jinnah own words on Junagar were these :






Because I am not Indian. Neither by birth, nor any other way. Is it really that hard to understand?



Lets stick to one point at a time, shall we? Lets first see what was the agreement between India and Pakistan back then, as understood by you.


I am sorry but I cannot keep up with how retarded your point it.

I am just going to keep typing facts and hope to keep you here as long as possible as a way to take up your time and save some poor Indian woman from being raped.

India agreed to Pakistan and thus agreed for Muslim majority area to go to Pakistan. This obviously means that non-Muslim majority areas go to India. Such as East Punjab, which were Sikh and the rest of India which was Majority Hindu.

Pakistan and India also did not allow princely states to choose independence as their 3rd option. India invaded states that chose the 3rd option.

India also invaded a couple of states that wanted to join Pakistan.

Pakistan only invaded Kashmir after the king wanted independence.
India established that that was Okay.

No matter what mental gymnastics you pull, India is wrong 100% and they are the reason 2 nuclear armed nations are at the brink of war today.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-50749764

Yep, I totally believe a non Indian would parrot exact RSS talking points.
Just admit it that you are a rapsitani man. No shame in that, your people love rapists, they vote them into office.

And sure, convenient to "stick to one subject" that way you never have to answer the question of what the actual Kashmirs want. Morally bankrupt people often use this tactic.
 
. .
India agreed to Pakistan and thus agreed for Muslim majority area to go to Pakistan. This obviously means that non-Muslim majority areas go to India. Such as East Punjab, which were Sikh and the rest of India which was Majority Hindu.
Alright, so here is the timeline.

1. Junagar declares that it will like to join Pakistan. [September 1947]

2. India disagrees and protests to Liaquat Ali Khan. [September 1947] Nehroo wrote this :
in case Junagadh became a part of the federation of Pakistan, Government of India cannot be expected to acquiesce to such an arrangement

3. Jinnah changes stance from what you said above about the agreement and says this in September 1947 :
the position of Indian states is very clearly defined and it was repeatedly accepted that after the lapse of paramountcy, every Indian state is independent and sovereign and free to join Pakistan or India Dominion

4. Pakistan backed militia entered Kashmir in mid October 1947.

5. Kashmir's King declared his agreement to join India in END of October 1947.

6. India sends forces to Kashmir AFTER Kashmir's King agrees to join India in End October 1947.

7. Indian forces enter Junagar on 1st Nov 1947.

Now :-

1. By entertaining Junagar's joining Pakistan even while having majority Hindu population and then saying this
the position of Indian states is very clearly defined and it was repeatedly accepted that after the lapse of paramountcy, every Indian state is independent and sovereign and free to join Pakistan or India Dominion
Jina basically went back on the agreement that you mentioned which was based on religion. He had no grounds left here.

Remember this happened BEFORE India did anything. And heck they even protested to you folks.

2. India's military invasion in Junagar happened AFTER Pakistan's start of military of Kashmir, which HAD joined India (if Junagar precedence exists). Jina simply made it possible by going back on Pakistan's promise that you have stated.

In the light of above two, remaining actions of India about annexing any place is immaterial because they all happened AFTER Junagar situation.

How can you now say that Pakistan HAD any moral or whatsoever grounds to pursue any right on Kashmir?

Jina broke the promise, plain and simple.
 
.
Alright, so here is the timeline.

1. Junagar declares that it will like to join Pakistan. [September 1947]

2. India disagrees and protests to Liaquat Ali Khan. [September 1947] Nehroo wrote this :


3. Jinnah changes stance from what you said above about the agreement and says this in September 1947 :


4. Pakistan backed militia entered Kashmir in mid October 1947.

5. Kashmir's King declared his agreement to join India in END of October 1947.

6. India sends forces to Kashmir AFTER Kashmir's King agrees to join India in End October 1947.

7. Indian forces enter Junagar on 1st Nov 1947.

Now :-

1. By entertaining Junagar's joining Pakistan even while having majority Hindu population and then saying this

Jina basically went back on the agreement that you mentioned which was based on religion. He had no grounds left here.

Remember this happened BEFORE India did anything. And heck they even protested to you folks.

2. India's military invasion in Junagar happened AFTER Pakistan's start of military of Kashmir, which HAD joined India (if Junagar precedence exists). Jina simply made it possible by going back on Pakistan's promise that you have stated.

In the light of above two, remaining actions of India about annexing any place is immaterial because they all happened AFTER Junagar situation.

How can you now say that Pakistan HAD any moral or whatsoever grounds to pursue any right on Kashmir?

Jina broke the promise, plain and simple.

Dont try furthermore the guy is adament.
 
. . .
Alright, so here is the timeline.

1. Junagar declares that it will like to join Pakistan. [September 1947]

2. India disagrees and protests to Liaquat Ali Khan. [September 1947] Nehroo wrote this :


3. Jinnah changes stance from what you said above about the agreement and says this in September 1947 :


4. Pakistan backed militia entered Kashmir in mid October 1947.

5. Kashmir's King declared his agreement to join India in END of October 1947.

6. India sends forces to Kashmir AFTER Kashmir's King agrees to join India in End October 1947.

7. Indian forces enter Junagar on 1st Nov 1947.

Now :-

1. By entertaining Junagar's joining Pakistan even while having majority Hindu population and then saying this

Jina basically went back on the agreement that you mentioned which was based on religion. He had no grounds left here.

Remember this happened BEFORE India did anything. And heck they even protested to you folks.

2. India's military invasion in Junagar happened AFTER Pakistan's start of military of Kashmir, which HAD joined India (if Junagar precedence exists). Jina simply made it possible by going back on Pakistan's promise that you have stated.

In the light of above two, remaining actions of India about annexing any place is immaterial because they all happened AFTER Junagar situation.

How can you now say that Pakistan HAD any moral or whatsoever grounds to pursue any right on Kashmir?

Jina broke the promise, plain and simple.

For the sake of argument lets say your timeline is correct.

Pakistan has a right to accept Junagar, what rules did they violate?
Ooops sorry, rapists don't believe in rules.
Okay, what precedence did they violate?
Did Pakistan force the issue? did they take military action there?

4. Just like India invaded goa and other princely states that wanted to go independent. What is the problem?

5. Only after India got involved. Had India kept playing it's own small dick and not got involved then number 5 would not have happened.

7 - India breaking the actual agree upon rules

Again, your mental gymnastics might work while you are raping women. But it is not going to work here.

India had no reason to get involved in Kashmir and Junagar could have been solved diplomatically and most likely with Pakistan giving it up just like we gave up Hyderabad.
Instead, small dick rapists sent in armies everywhere and now are crying when they are suffering the consequences of their actions.

Still waiting to address the democratic rights of the Kashmir people, something you promised them. Actually promised, as in by law promised.
But you will never acknowledge this, just like you won't acknowledge your rape victims.
 
.
Pakistan has a right to accept Junagar, what rules did they violate?
India agreed to Pakistan and thus agreed for Muslim majority area to go to Pakistan. This obviously means that non-Muslim majority areas go to India. Such as East Punjab, which were Sikh and the rest of India which was Majority Hindu.

I rest my case.
 
.
are you forgetting our 27 Feb response. do you need more, you trigger one event, and there will be no stop from our end till we reach to Delhi. We already inform to your Master, that is why you are seeing this article.But we know it, your master is trying this small thing into your little brain but you are uncoachable.
Nah... real wars are boring and long... we will fight here in PDF... one day Pakistanis can conquer Delhi in PDF and next day Indian keypad warriors can conquer Rawalpindi to release the pressure on Delhi.. its lots of fun..
 
.
I rest my case.

Your resting something.
2 points.

1. It was of the British Raj, the princely states were given a choice.

2. So buy your own "case" Kashmir should go to Pakistan since it's Muslim.
India Objected to Hydrabad and Junagar going to Pakistan on the basis of their being Hindu... so ... why does it get Kashmir?

You don't win street shitter.
Either Muslims go to Pakistan and Hindus to India so India is justified in taking Junagar and Hydrabad and unjustified in taking Kashmir.
or
Religion does not matter in which case India full on invaded and wrongfully took Junagar and Hydrabad.

Which mental gymnastics do you want to go by?
 
.
Your resting something.
2 points.

1. It was of the British Raj, the princely states were given a choice.

2. So buy your own "case" Kashmir should go to Pakistan since it's Muslim.
India Objected to Hydrabad and Junagar going to Pakistan on the basis of their being Hindu... so ... why does it get Kashmir?

You don't win street shitter.
Either Muslims go to Pakistan and Hindus to India so India is justified in taking Junagar and Hydrabad and unjustified in taking Kashmir.
or
Religion does not matter in which case India full on invaded and wrongfully took Junagar and Hydrabad.

Which mental gymnastics do you want to go by?
@GHALIB This above, remember this. This is the voice of a defeated man.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom