What's new

India and Pakistan Are Edging Closer to War in 2020

Thats actually interesting. I did some reading on this J&K issue as it is quite popular in the circles I move (mostly having Pakistan and Indian folks). So here are something I found...

1. Patell wanted Hyderabad (it was held by some local king who was muslim I guess) and was ready to let go Kashmir.

2. Patell suffered a setback and surprise in Junagraha (again held by a local Muslim king). The local king acceded to Pakistan and Patell expected Jinnha to turn him down based on Hindu population. This was September 1947. See this news paper article : https://www.thenews.com.pk/tns/detail/555860-junagadh-legally-pakistan



3. This gave Nehroo enough ammunition to shut Patell down. When in October 47, time came for Kashmir, this time the board was laid the other way round. It was a Hindu King wanting to join India with a massive Muslim population in the kingdom. It basically allowed Nehroo to argue that by the same token that Jinha used to defend Junagar's accession to Pakistan, he could seek Kashmir to join India. He also had some personal interest in the region as it was his native place or something.

So in all, it was Pakistan who broke this gentleman's agreement of letting Muslim regions join Pakistan and Hindu join India, in September '47. This lead to India playing the same game in October 47 in Kashmir.

Yep, you are Indian as your poo in the loo logic checks out.

"Jinnah wanted Junagraha so it's okay for us to invade Kashmir"

Did Jinnah launch a military invasion of Junagraha ? Hydrabad?
Of course not.

so your poo in the loo logic falls flat.

India, against all democratic, diplomatic, and agreed upon accords with Pakistan, just invaded Kashmir and caused 70 years of suffering for everyone.

Any neutral person can see that had India not done so, there were not be millions of troops and nukes pointed at each other in the subcontinent.

Pakistan made no moves to take Junagraha or Hydrabad, and to this day no Pakistani is claiming those places as Pakistani. They are Hindu majority and they rightfully belong to India.

Unfortunately, our advisory has poo not only in the loo, but also the brain and cannot accept that all the animosity is 100% due to their actions.
 
.
Yep, you are Indian as your poo in the loo logic checks out.

"Jinnah wanted Junagraha so it's okay for us to invade Kashmir"

Did Jinnah launch a military invasion of Junagraha ? Hydrabad?
Of course not.

so your poo in the loo logic falls flat.

India, against all democratic, diplomatic, and agreed upon accords with Pakistan, just invaded Kashmir and caused 70 years of suffering for everyone.

Any neutral person can see that had India not done so, there were not be millions of troops and nukes pointed at each other in the subcontinent.

Pakistan made no moves to take Junagraha or Hydrabad, and to this day no Pakistani is claiming those places as Pakistani. They are Hindu majority and they rightfully belong to India.

Unfortunately, our advisory has poo not only in the loo, but also the brain and cannot accept that all the animosity is 100% due to their actions.
Save the expletives, I had to insult another elderly on PDF in the morning and I will hate to do it again. Even if you are wrong and nutty as fruit bar.

First, How could Pakistan have invaded territories deep in India in 47? Hyderabad and junagar. They had no land border with Pakistan and Pakistan had no major navy or airforce back then to occupy those territories. Pakistan actually showed its true colors when it came to Kashmir. They could invade so invade they did.

Another basic issue comes to this : if you believe Hindu dominated area should go to India and Muslim one to Pakistan then why play the double standard to begin with? Why have one set of rules for areas you want and another for area you don’t? When you play such games well others will play the same game with you.

Jinha should have rejected Junagar to begin with. He was not with clean hands.

Lastly, who the hell are you to arbitrarily decide the standard at military invasion. If jina and Pakistan wanted to be treated fairly they should have played the fair game to begin with.

That’s the shit your Pakistan is in.
 
Last edited:
.
Save the expletives, I had to insult another elderly on PDF in the morning and I will hate to do it again.

The basic issue comes to this : if you believe Hindu dominated area should go to India and Muslim one to Pakistan then why play the double standard to begin with? Why have one set of rules for areas you want and another for area you don’t? When you play such games well others will play the same game with you.

Jinha should have rejected Junagar to begin with. He was not with clear hands.

Lastly, who the hell are you to arbitrarily decide the standard at military invasion. If jina and Pakistan wanted to be treated fairly they should have played the fair game to begin with.

That’s the shit your Pakistan is in.

Btw, there is also one more issue. How could you invade territories deep in India in 47? Hyderabad and junagar.
Is poo expletive now?
No wonder Indians are so scared of using the toilet.

And please, bring it. Nothing you can say that other street poopers have not already said.

Your argument is flimsy that it's ridiculous.

Your argument is:
Junagar and Hydrabad wanted to go to Pakistan and since Jinnah entertained it, India is justified in enslaving Kashmir.
That is some supa dupa pawa 2020 levels of mental gymnastics.

India is morally and ethically bankrupt, the world is seeing it in 2019-2020, but Pakistanis saw it in 1947.


the problem is that I only made my original post out of good faith to @kansika
The reason I don't make arguments to reason and logic is because street poopers like you show up with nonsense arguments and mental gymnastics.

End of the day, India agreed to Muslim majority areas going to Pakistan, then looked down it's pants and saw it's (scientifically proven) small dick and decided to compensate with invading Kashmir.
 
.
Junagar and Hydrabad wanted to go to Pakistan and since Jinnah entertained it, India is justified in enslaving Kashmir.
Yes, this is how the real world works. If you set a precedence, you are judged by it. Full stop. By considering Hyderabad and Junagar, Pakistan gave up legal or moral rights on Kashmir. Rest is simply game of pure military power. India grabbed what it could, Pakistan grabbed what she could.

Lastly, even if Jina wanted, he could have not attacked Junagar and Hyderabad due to not having any land border. Where Jina had a chance he attacked, ie Kashmir.

Rest of your post is too stupid to even consider.
 
.
Yes, this is how the real world works. If you set a precedence, you are judged by it. Full stop.

Lastly, even if Jina wanted, he could have not attacked Junagar and Hyderabad due to not having any land border.

Rest of your post is too stupid to even talk about

So what precedence was set?
You yourself said Pakistan did not invade those two palaces.

This is what i am talking about when I say indians have poo poo in the brain.

Street shitter:
PaKiStAn CoUlD NoT iNvade HyDrAbAd

Same street shitter:
PakIsTan SeT pReCeDeNcE oF iNvAsIoN sO InDiA iS rIgHt To InVaDe KaShmir

You are so stupid that you literally negated your own argument in one post

**EDIT**
Also, why are you not flying your Indian flag?
Too many people called you a rapist in real life?
 
.
So when are you fighting??? Are you ready for a war....:taz::taz::taz::taz::taz::taz::taz:??

dude you do know Prime Minister of Pakistan has already told the UN of all possible options.

nothing that will happen will be a surprise for those who can see beyond their own front yard.

you gonna get it
 
.
So what precedence was set?
These were Jina's own words :
after the lapse of paramountcy, every Indian state is independent and sovereign and free to join Pakistan or India Dominion.
Basically he kicked the entire Hindu Muslim equation out of the window. It was no longer Hindu majority region should go to India and Muslim Majority regions go to Pakistan anymore.
You yourself said Pakistan did not invade those two palaces.
There is a difference between did not and could not. Even if Pakistan wanted, it could not attack either of the places due to geography. There was no land border there. When there was a land border you attacked. In Kashmir that is.

Street shitter:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Lemme guess, you are a Poon-ja-bee Moosleem as well? You guys are such a sore loser. Older you get, stupider you are.

Also, why are you not flying your Indian flag?
Well, I am not a Poon-Ja-Bee Moosleem like you, may be that why.
 
Last edited:
. . .
These were Jina's own words :



There is a difference between did not and could not. Even if Pakistan wanted, it could not attack either of the places due to geography. There was no land border there. When there was a land border you attacked. In Kashmir that is.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Lemme guess, you are a Poon-ja-bee Moosleem as well? You guys are such a sore loser. Older you get, stupider you are.


Well, I am not a Poon-Ja-Bee Moosleem like you, may be that why.


Yes, because Both India and Pakistan agreed to it. What part of that do you not understand?
India and Pakistan both Agreed to let the princely state join India OR Pakistan.
You're so retarded that you don't seem to understand this. What Jinnah said is what was agreed upon.

Again, your argument is so flimsy it might as well be one of the Indian women you statistically raped.

Pakistan only stated what India and Pakistan agreed to. India then rejected it and invaded.
Then when Kashmir happened, all of a sudden princely decree is word of God and they invaded them too.

Listen, I am just happy you are on PDF as it gives you less change to rape some poor Indian woman.
I will say, just because you are ashamed to fly your Indian flag doesn't mean people will not figure out that you are a rapist.
 
. .
Yes, because Both India and Pakistan agreed to it. What part of that do you not understand?
India and Pakistan both Agreed to let the princely state join India OR Pakistan.
Based on religion or Choice of ruler? If religion then why entertain Junagar?
If Choice of ruler then why did Jina invade Kashmir?
You're so retarded that you don't seem to understand this. What Jinnah said is what was agreed upon.
So do you mean it was choice of ruler, then what issue is left on Kashmir? Kashmir's ruler exercised his choice to join India and Pakistan should get the hell out of Kashmir. End of trouble.
Pakistan only stated what India and Pakistan agreed to. India then rejected it and invaded.
You can state one thing and do another. If you do so you are a hypocrite and then you are fair game. Thats what Pakistan tried and result is in front of us.
Listen, I am just happy you are on PDF as it gives you less change to rape some poor Indian woman.
I am not happy that you are in Canada. Who knows when you will go to lala land and boom! So get the hell out of my Canada you stupid Poon-Ja-Bee!
 
Last edited:
. .
Based on religion or Choice of ruler? If religion then why entertain Junagar?
If Choice of ruler then why did Jina invade Kashmir?

Based on the agreement of Pakistan and India and the precedence that India set.

For crying out loud, India invaded every princely state that wanted to be independent. I am not even talking about places that wanted to go with Pakistan.

They then invaded Goa in the 60s, a state that wasn't even part of the British raj and thus not part of agreement.

No matter how much cow pee you drink you cannot mentally gymnastics your way out of this.

India not only invaded Hyderabad, Junagraha, and Kashmir, they also invaded neutral states that wanted to be independent as well as goa.

Pakistan on the other side only ever invaded Kashmir as the People were Muslim and according to the agreement with India, rightfully belongs to Pakistan.


I will also add that in all the discussions with street shitters like you on India, you people never ever address the democratic aspirations of Kashmirs.

IOK does not want to be with India, that is a fact. They might want independence or to join Pakistan, but they do not want to be with India.

Rapistan ignores them because they know this and instead focuses on mental gymnastics.

Not a single Indian rapist here has ever taken the Kashmiri aspirations in mind when doing said gymnastics.
 
.
Based on the agreement of Pakistan and India and the precedence that India set.
Alright! Lets hear it from you, what was that agreement? Was it the same that Jina stated?

after the lapse of paramountcy, every Indian state is independent and sovereign and free to join Pakistan or India Dominion.

Was this the agreement?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom