t-birds
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2007
- Messages
- 323
- Reaction score
- 0
Your perception and the reality are quite different. Judging by the way you refer to aircraft in service, I'd venture that either you are clueless or are acting that way (have seen both types on the forum and in most cases posts like the ones above by you would lead to your banning). Accidents happen and will continue to happen. At the end of 2008, you can look back and see the rate of attrition in the PAF and it won't be any worse than the other Air Forces flying at similar rate (180 hours/year).
As far as JF-17 prod. is concerned, its 8 and 8 (16 per year) to start off the program. There has been no mention of what the upper limit is on the production run in either of the countries (Pakistan and China) when the production ramps up. PAF will replace the aging sqns first even if that means that PLAAF has to wait a bit longer for the type.
So .Whats your perception in this matter? Or do you have one? And if I were you I wouldnt venture out too far because you seem to be hitting cloud 9 all the time .
Accidents happen and will continue to happen . Yeah right flying those things and I wouldnt be surprised
PAF will replace the aging sqns first even if that means that PLAAF has to wait a bit longer for the type And wheres your source on this ?