HAL Tejas | Updates, News & Discussions

[JonAsad]

yes surely jf17 can beat MKi but in dreams

and as m told u that u cant even make ww2 era aircraft, k8 and jf17 is Chinese not urs

Well LCA is israeli then,
atleast we can say that K8 is fast and its acceleration is what we expected..
Your fighter plane is not worth flying what about your Jet Trainer HJT-36 sitara

if sitara acc and top speed meets your requirment then maybe you should switch the roles of both air crafts.

 

[ISRO]

Well LCA is israeli then,
atleast we can say that K8 is fast and its acceleration is what we expected..
Your fighter plane is not worth flying what about your Jet Trainer HJT-36 sitara

if sitara acc and top speed meets your requirment then maybe you should switch the roles of both air crafts.

use K8 as ur main fighter cause its in same league of jf17

we have our Mkis

 

[shrivatsa]

Well LCA is israeli then,
atleast we can say that K8 is fast and its acceleration is what we expected..
Your fighter plane is not worth flying what about your Jet Trainer HJT-36 sitara

if sitara acc and top speed meets your requirment then maybe you should switch the roles of both air crafts.

yup sitara is enough for jf -17.

 

[JonAsad]

use K8 as ur main fighter cause its in same league of jf17

we have our Mkis

Yeah...
Use Mki's against us and we will bring jf-17
Bring LCA against us and we will bring fully loaded K8 trainers.



Can you see the difference?

 

[shrivatsa]

use K8 as ur main fighter cause its in same league of jf17

we have our Mkis

dude uderstand what he is telling ,when sitara is enough for jf 17 why to induct lca poor India can save lots of money.

 

[JonAsad]

yup sitara is enough for jf -17.

go up stairs and read wots the discussion is about.. dont just poke troller

 

[JonAsad]

dude uderstand what he is telling ,when sitara is enough for jf 17 why to induct lca poor India can save lots of money.

another troll.. dont assume what i am saying.. READDD

 

[shrivatsa]

go up stairs and read wots the discussion is about.. dont just poke troller

yup its about you suggesting us to induct sitara instead of lca .you are rite actually why to induct lca when sitara can do the job against jf 17

 

[JonAsad]

yup its about you suggesting us to induct sitara instead of lca .you are rite actually why to induct lca when sitara can do the job against jf 17

Lol... then throw mki at sea.. no need of them.. lol

 

[shrivatsa]

Lol... then thorw mki at sea.. no need for them.. lol

yup you are rite.Oh god why did our govt waste money on mki when sitara was more then enough .we should thank Pakistani brothers for enlightening us.

 

[Vasily Zaytsev]

Yep, It was in 1994 maybe.

Since then world has moved on, but LCA is still stuck with 1980's concept.

Whats surprising is the this Guy, subramanium, pleading for 60 order, when he know he is not delivering the LCA to the agreed specification.


LCA falls so short, that it can qualify no more than a trainer now, hopefully.

World may have moved on but we haven't.

We are still using Mig 21 and would continue to operate them for a decade more atleast.

I want to know which 80s concept you are talking about...
The digital fly by wire, glass cockpit, LCD MFD's, Composites, or the mission computer.

The IAF has already placed order for 40, he is only adding one more squadron.

LCA falls short of what? Specifics please.

Don't talk in the air. Clearly state what are the specifications of IAF one by one and on how LCA falls short of each on of those specifications.


Till then

 

[JonAsad]

yup you are rite.Oh god why did our govt waste money on mki when sitara was more then enough .we should thank Pakistani brothers for enlightening us.

well if its sarcasm then the equation is simple
jf-17 vs su30 mki
k8 trainers vs LCA

and if what you ment is true then you are welcome

 

[shrivatsa]

no dear is sitara vs jf 17,mki is out of the league

 

[JonAsad]

no dear is sitara vs jf 17,mki is out of the league

lol.. but according to your previous post mki's are better of in the sea
you look a bit confused

 

[shrivatsa]

nop i am not confused its sitara better then jf 17 as you suggested