Come on guys, be fair, he has some points!
He is right, we have no contract with Lockhead Martin, donno why but for some reasons we made it with
General
Electric for those engines.
This comment foxed me completely.
The GE404 is a motor produced by General Electric; why on earth should we haved contracted with Lockheed Martin for it? What did Lockheed have to do with it?
All Lockheed did was (parallel to BAe US) discuss how control laws were written. Our ADE scientists actually starting writing these in their laboratories, then one fine morning, they were asked to vacate the premises, without even getting their own personal notes back!
Engines? What did they have to do with engines?
Even here, he might have a point:
Pakistan Aeronautical Complex....
And he is right here as well, we might have integrated the Litening targeting pod years ago, have droped dumb bombs with high accuracy, are developing our own LGB, co-developing sat guidance for KAB Bomb series, developing a carrier version that possibly should be able to use an anti ship missile, but otherwise there is not much and other fighters offers might offer more:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/931408-post2725.html
As you can see, he obviously knows what he is talking about, so he must be right, that a fighter with a maximum speed of Mach 1.6, a range of 2000Km and that has nothing else then dumb bombs so far, might have several issues. So we should be happy that Tejas is not inducted into service in our air force now.