DESERT FIGHTER
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2010
- Messages
- 46,973
- Reaction score
- 95
- Country
- Location
>IAF is looking for 24° but
IAF is looking for 24.. Right now it's 22 .. But who cares the pvt indian blog,mag knows everything..
>Now JF17 production started since 2007 ,even after all those hulla hull ,you guys just assembled 50 Nos. Now 50 aircrafts without BVR ,IFR,basic EW and AOA of just 26°. In simple words IOC 2 equivalent aircrafts still flying in numbers
Again wrong on all facts just like your previous post tht was debunked..
.MAR series,CM400AKG,C series anti ship,LS,Takbir,indigenous PGMs,SOMs like H-4,H-2,SD-10A,PL5 latest versions all completed however non of them fitted and flying but too good for static showcase.
Again wrong.. Lmao at you .. Read the JFT info thread link with PAF ACMs interview ... Even RAAD ALCMs integration has started .. Lmao .. While pic of a JFT with C series,SD-10,MAR etc are also there I debunk your nonsense ..
Heck even Block II upgrades have been started on the older Block Is..
>Here we go for Cobam IFR integration Image as old as 2010
Again .. How many operational?? Sticking an IFR probe on a prototype facing several issues is not a big deal...
couple of important pieces of trivia released with IOC 2 press release.
1) Combat radius and ferry range of 500 and 1700 km respectively (internal fuel)
2) Production facility has jigs with laser trackers to ensure tolerance of less than 80 microns. That's not as good as JSF's production facility which has jigs with <50 micron tolerances, but it's a good start anyway.
Transparency is everything in development of Tejas without any boasting or twisted numbers.
Thanks but I'd like to see a credible source for even this ..