What's new

GDP per capita of every district in South Asia

India prosperity as shown in map, all regions in India are prosperous in equal unlike China,pakistan,Afghanistan,Iran where the population, prosperity concentrated on certain regions in the country... UAE,Singapore also seen in bright spot

View attachment 436880
Hard to separate BD from India in this map. But BD looks good, I guess.

And Myanmar looks dark.

Memo to COW: Continuous Offensive Wing (formerly Research and Analysis Wing):

The following action programme is to be taken up immediately:
  1. Feed the border districts more.
  2. Fit large exhaust fans facing west.
  3. Transfer all cattle beyond their productive life to those districts.
  4. Feed them even more.
  5. Fit more fans.
Just found a secret weapon to depopulate our pesky neighbours, and send them running for life into the mountains.
LMAO
 
.
Can I ask your source? As per the World Bank it was 79.2% in 2014, so must have been lower in 2013.

____________________________

Pakistan has done well in this regards. 97.5% of the population had access to electricity as of 2014. Geography in this sense works to Pakistan's advantage, as most people are concentrated in smaller areas, whereas in India the population is spread out through wider regions. We consequently have to spend less on infrastructure.

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.ACCS.ZS?year_high_desc=true[/QUO
Faggot.You think we are ten year old kids here? This is some two bit organization that has no capability to carry out it's own primary surveys. It has "culled" the info from various other sources which are not named. So let me sum this up. You overlook World Banks figures which has resources and has dealings across the world for some two bit organization named "worldenergyoutlook" and then paste their crap here. What a freakin cheatin faggot you are.

For all I know its some Gandhoo like you who has set this thing up and started crapping. Statistics at best of times are to be looked at as 'guides' only but at least with World Bank etc they do have a claimed element of objectivity. But private two bit entities that come by the dozen carry zero currency.

And let me recap. This shite source you gave do not have primary surveys. They just gather their data and we have no idea what methodology was used. If I and few other Pakistanis set up a dot.org would you be prepared to lap up the figures we would give out and ignore World Bank?

You can't digest the truth, so you resort to name calling. World energy outlook by IEA is a primary source for many reserchers and journalistic articles. You are actually a two bit think tank analyst who couldn't argue on merit but rather resort to name calling.

Here is a credible source for you to know how well lit your pakistan is at nights.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddar...-maps-open-up-possible-real-time-applications
 
.
Chinese are failed to send Mars probe yet even with help of Russian assistance, go and figure it out...India is the only country send Mars probe in first attempt,not even US achieved that...
You should be ashamed that the most impoverished country in the world is spending millions on 'space missions'.
 
.
Last edited:
.
You can't digest the truth, so you resort to name calling. World energy outlook by IEA is a primary source for many reserchers and journalistic articles. You are actually a two bit think tank analyst who couldn't argue on merit but rather resort to name calling.

Here is a credible source for you to know how well lit your pakistan is at nights.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddar...-maps-open-up-possible-real-time-applications
Look my apologies for resorting to name calling but I get annoyed when people don't show common courtesy to provide sources or links to anything they paste here. However going back to the subject in hand I have for a fair few years been interested in the apparent enigma. That Pakistan's at the observational level seem to always be doing better than official figures even in UK. I remember years ago at university there was a debate we were having and our lecturer pulled some stats that showed Brit-Paks at the bottom of the economic basket - even below the Afro-Caribean community.

Rather bemused at what I was hearing being a lone voice I struggled to correct this sentiment in our group but then penny dropped. I asked them [fellow students] how many of them were renting and how many were renting from Pakistan landlords. Almost 60% said Pakistani. Then I asked how many use black cabs. All did. I asked how many were Pakistani drivers? Almost 90% said Pakistani. Then I asked how many went to fast food joints. Many. I asked next time they visit a kebab joint to ask the question who person was behind the bussiness.

My point was if Pakistanis were renting properties out that must mean they owned their own homes. That must mean they had enough capital to purchase at least two properties when your typical Afro-Caribean was living in a government funded and owned flats. Black can drivers can make upto or over £800 pw and cabs can often cost over £50k to just buy the licence plate.

I digress but my point is my guts told me the average Pakistani in Pakistan is better off in every aspect other othan female emancipation compared to his Indian counterpart. Official figures notwithstanding. It was in the quest to resolve this puzzle that I came across new reearch being done that used satellite imagery of light pollution to size up poverty. This was a academic paper peer reviewed that focussed not on South Asia but the general concept of using light as a tool to overcome poor statistical evaluation in the developing world. When I get chance I will post here. Although the paper dates from 2013 but lets be honest I don't think that is century ago and the basic results will still be applicable. The results of the paper were most surprising. When I post it I will tag you.

And do note one satellite image proves nothing. As I said before one snapshot image will not cover anomalies like loadshedding, blackout that might have been in force when the image was taken. The way the researchers in the study I mention went about was they used hundreds of images from which a composite was made to give a true reflection of the facts on the ground.


Ps. In the meantime do please look at India. I think everbody even Pakistanis are aware that Bihar is grossly poor and below par. Now have a look at the image you posted. It is glowing !
 
Last edited:
.
Many people criticize space program, when ISRO also getting good revenue,save life prediction of storms by satellite images etc...Space is now become common man need also, as every common now a days have mobile communication.It also creates proud moment for any country.
Not many people realize that India was one of the first developing countries to benefit from satellite technologies. For example, NASA sponsored a cooperative education program in the 1970s where Indian students received instruction from the U.S. teachers via satellite-beamed television.

That said, I've run the economics numbers before on PDF and I think ISRO is going to have a tough time competing with Space-X when it comes to satellite launching.
 
. .
Here is a credible source for you to know how well lit your pakistan is at nights.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddar...-maps-open-up-possible-real-time-applications
This is the image you gave the link for. Going by this Bihar [yellow], Uttar Pradesh [blue] are land of lights, honey and milk in India. And Indian Punjab [blue] is in the dark and starving. That must make lot of sense !

In fact look at Gujrat in India. I was told it was th most prosperous state in India. Apparently not going by this image.


WkZbdnn.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
India is richer than Pakistan off course because of there are more rich in India than Pakistan. The GDP of Mararshtra alone is bigger than GDP of entire Pakistan.

But then India is also more poorer than Pakistan. The poors in UP alone is more than all poors of Pakistan. India has 1.3 billion population. So numbers will always be big like top universities, top institutes etc. but same thing will also apply in negative things. The visibility of poverty is much more in India than Pakistan and you cannot hide away by posting above questions.

In proportion also you don't have any match with India.The stock market capitalization of India is 44 times larger than pakistan,electricity production 15 times,IT industry almost 60 times and the list goes like that....

This is the image you gave the link for. Going by this Bihar [yellow], Uttar Pradesh [blue] are land of lights, honey and milk in India. And Indian Punjab [blue] is in the dark and starving. That must make lot of sense !

WkZbdnn.jpg

The picture is correct as it is evident from the western ghats itself, as most of the places is thick vegetations and forest and so dark...Overall India looks very bright and becomes more brighter in coming years as more villages are connected to line distribution.
 
. .
Not many people realize that India was one of the first developing countries to benefit from satellite technologies. For example, NASA sponsored a cooperative education program in the 1970s where Indian students received instruction from the U.S. teachers via satellite-beamed television.

That said, I've run the economics numbers before on PDF and I think ISRO is going to have a tough time competing with Space-X when it comes to satellite launching.

ISRO busy with soo many projects from regional satellite navigation system(Like GPS) and many other projects and i don't think that ISRO worried about SpaceX

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_foreign_satellites_launched_by_India
 
.
Can you take a look at Gujrat or Indian Punjab. Care to tell me why they are comparatively dark but Bihar is lit like a Christmas tree?
Does this make sense??? I was not aware that Bihar is the Silicon Valley of India ???


Od6FJuv.jpg
 
.
In proportion also you don't have any match with India.The stock market capitalization of India is 44 times larger than pakistan,electricity production 15 times,IT industry almost 60 times and the list goes like that....



India is ranked 139th in per capita GDP and Pakistan rank in the world is 144 according to GDP nominal, in purchasing power parity, the difference is minuscule, Pakistan was ahead of India in both nominal and PPP GDP till 2006(nominal) and 2008(PPP).

Pakistan is doing better in some sectors and India is doing better in some sectors, the reason Pakistan matches with India in GDP per capita otherwise the difference would be huge like Indo-China has this discrepancy.

China economy is 5 times bigger than India and its per capita GDP is also 5 times bigger than India, the difference is stark when India starts comparing with China.

P.S: Pakistan population is just 15% of India's population.

http://statisticstimes.com/economy/india-vs-pakistan-gdp.php

https://photius.com/rankings/2017/economy/gdp_per_capita_2017_0.html
 
.
.
Does this make sense??? I was not aware that Bihar is the Silicon Valley of India ???


Od6FJuv.jpg
Care to look at density of population of the states you talk about Versus the size of the state by land area? Why try and complicate things when an elementary school kid can tell you why?
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom