What's new

GDP per capita of every district in South Asia

.
.
So, now it's irrelevant as it's better than Pak.


Marginally ahead of Pakistan...doesn't merit a mention. Pakistan was actually stalling more than India developing in HDI.

But in one province of Pakistan (KPK)frontier province, the education, health, welfare and police has improved beyond expectations, where PTI has a govt. A 50% drop in poverty levels, about 1.5 lacs students moving to govt. schools from private schools, about 70% of the population provided with health cards with about 0.6 million rupees ceiling, the best police reforms and many more...
 
.
I doubt anybody bothered to read the peer reviewed scientific acadamic study I posted earlier. But I will give a summary here. It involved using hundreds of satellite images over period of time to build a composite that offset any deviations or anomalies that might arise. Then that data was offset and tabulated against population density. Obviously in a desert there will be only a few people thus light emission will be less. In a densely packed city the reverse is true so the researchers built complex mathematical models to offset this and other variables. Then once a complex model was devoloped they tested out the result on sample areas where they had very good records or statistics. By doig this they refined the model. This and the complex methodology and the maths is explained behind this in the paper. One of the senior researchers is I believe Indian.


Sustainability 2013, 5(12), 4988-5019; doi:10.3390/su5124988

Article

Using Nighttime Satellite Imagery as a Proxy Measure of Human Well-Being

Tilottama Ghosh 1,*, Sharolyn J. Anderson 2, Christopher D. Elvidge 3 and Paul C. Sutton 2,4

1 Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA

2 School of Natural and Built Environments and The Barbara Hardy Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia

3 NOAA National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, CO 80305, USA

4 Department of Geography, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; Tel.: +91-8826860007.

Received: 23 September 2013; in revised form: 8 October 2013 / Accepted: 4 November 2013 / Published: 26 November 2013


Abstract

Improving human well-being is increasingly recognized as essential for movement toward a sustainable and desirable future. Estimates of different aspects of human well-being, such as Gross Domestic Product, or percentage of population with access to electric power, or measuring the distribution of income in society are often fraught with problems. There are few standardized methods of data collection; in addition, the required data is not obtained in a reliable manner and on a repetitive basis in many parts of the world. Consequently, inter-comparability of the data that does exist becomes problematic. Data derived from nighttime satellite imagery has helped develop various globally consistent proxy measures of human well-being at the gridded, sub-national, and national level. We review several ways in which nighttime satellite imagery has been used to measure the human well-being within nations.


Link > http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/12/4988/htm


The results are for the entire globe however I have extracted the map data for South Asia but if people want to see the entirety of the data please refer to the full article. I provided the link above. Here is the map data for South Asia produced by researchers who are mostly American academics from various US universities as listed above.


N2N7ldZ.png
rKIvW3t.png



As you can see Pakistan is mostly green. So is South India but Ganga India is loaded and dominated by orange. We already know that this part of India has over 500 million people. This shows the scale of real poverty India. States like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Jharkand, Odisha, West Bengal are afflicted by vast poverty which will not come as any surprise. South India, Indian Punjab, Gujrat do well again which not a surprise. All this is consistent with what we know about poverty and states in India not doing well. However this demonstrates the scale of poverty in India and Bangladesh.

You can stick your Mars, Venuses and Milky Way down the Ganga. Pakistan as whole comes out far, far better than India. Perhaps the reason why half of India has to poop outside is not because they are too tight with their money but maybe because they are too poor to eat let alone think of the post eating problems like building toilets.

Full Scale Map dataset for world here > http://www.mdpi.com/sustainability/.../html/images/sustainability-05-04988-g004.png



@Pluralist @Kambojaric @protest @SOUTHie
@django @WhyCry @Joe Shearer @nair @Talwar e Pakistan etc
 
Last edited:
.
Marginally ahead of Pakistan...doesn't merit a mention. Pakistan was actually stalling more than India developing in HDI.

Pakistan had a uniform development in HDI. While we reached our largest GDP growth rate in 2010 at more than 10% growth.
But in one province of Pakistan (KPK)frontier province, the education, health, welfare and police has improved beyond expectations, where PTI has a govt. A 50% drop in poverty levels, about 1.5 lacs students moving to govt. schools from private schools, about 70% of the population provided with health cards with about 0.6 million rupees ceiling, the best police reforms and many more...
I'm not going to go through details on what is why and how.
There may be a hundred reasons. My only point is, India and Pakistan are not comparable countries.

We are on polar opposites in terms of any matter. We have our relation when it comes to development as, neither of us are a developed nation. Only that matters.

Throw the defense industries and crap to the drain, develop the basic needs.
 
.
As you can see Pakistan is mostly green. So is South India but Ganga India is loaded and dominated by orange. We already know that this part of India has over 500 million people. This shows the scale of real poverty India. States like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Jharkand, Odisha, West Bengal are afflicted by vast poverty which will not come as any surprise. South India, Indian Punjab, Gujrat do well again which not a surprise. All this is consistent with what we know about poverty and states in India not doing well. However this demonstrates the scale of poverty in India and Bangladesh.


Yes I read it and is believable and plausible what you have shared here, those poverty stricken states in India is called BIMARU states, BIMARU is an acronym formed from the first letters of the names of the India states of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh.

And UP alone had a population of 22 crore, more than the population of Pakistan and with a much lower GDP, nominal and PPP GDP. So that earlier map of OP looks flawed and skewed.

Another thing what I was thinking is that India landmass is about 3.7 times bigger than Pakistan(excluding GB and Azad Kashmir) which India includes in its landmass, and Pakistan doesn't, actually Pakistan is about 92,000 sq.kms bigger than what is shown in Google search.

And India population is about 6.5 times bigger than Pakistan, so the population density in India is about twice that of Pakistan, the reason more population in a smaller area tend to have more GDP, like UP India is about 22 crore, a much smaller area than Pakistan, spread that out and the area will become lighter color if that depicts GDP per area.

so this is a hoax....just like the Internet hoax spread by the Indians that Mumbai GDP is higher than Pakistan which factually is incorrect, they will cite PPP GDP of Mumbai and nominal GDP of Pakistan, even then Pakistan nominal GDP is much higher than Mumbai. And Pakistan Purchasing power parity(PPP) GDP is now about 1.1 trillion USD(1100 billion USD), much higher than the PPP GDP of Mumbai and surrounding areas which is about 360 billion USD.
 
.
I doubt anybody bothered to read the peer reviewed scientific acadamic study I posted earlier. But I will give a summary here. It involved using hundreds of satellite images over period of time to build a composite that offset any deviations or anomalies that might arise. Then that data was offset and tabulated against population density. Obviously in a desert there will be only a few people thus light emission will be less. In a densely packed city the reverse is true so the researchers built complex mathematical models to offset this and other variables. Then once a complex model was devoloped they tested out the result on sample areas where they had very good records or statistics. By doig this they refined the model. This and the complex methodology and the maths is explained behind this in the paper. One of the senior researchers is I believe Indian.


Sustainability 2013, 5(12), 4988-5019; doi:10.3390/su5124988

Article

Using Nighttime Satellite Imagery as a Proxy Measure of Human Well-Being

Tilottama Ghosh 1,*, Sharolyn J. Anderson 2, Christopher D. Elvidge 3 and Paul C. Sutton 2,4

1 Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA

2 School of Natural and Built Environments and The Barbara Hardy Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia

3 NOAA National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, CO 80305, USA

4 Department of Geography, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; Tel.: +91-8826860007.

Received: 23 September 2013; in revised form: 8 October 2013 / Accepted: 4 November 2013 / Published: 26 November 2013


Abstract

Improving human well-being is increasingly recognized as essential for movement toward a sustainable and desirable future. Estimates of different aspects of human well-being, such as Gross Domestic Product, or percentage of population with access to electric power, or measuring the distribution of income in society are often fraught with problems. There are few standardized methods of data collection; in addition, the required data is not obtained in a reliable manner and on a repetitive basis in many parts of the world. Consequently, inter-comparability of the data that does exist becomes problematic. Data derived from nighttime satellite imagery has helped develop various globally consistent proxy measures of human well-being at the gridded, sub-national, and national level. We review several ways in which nighttime satellite imagery has been used to measure the human well-being within nations.


Link > http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/12/4988/htm


The results are for the entire globe however I have extracted the map data for South Asia but if people want to see the entirety of the data please refer to the full article. I provided the link above. Here is the map data for South Asia produced by researchers who are mostly American academics from various US universities as listed above.


N2N7ldZ.png
rKIvW3t.png



As you can see Pakistan is mostly green. So is South India but Ganga India is loaded and dominated by orange. We already know that this part of India has over 500 million people. This shows the scale of real poverty India. States like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Jharkand, Odisha, West Bengal are afflicted by vast poverty which will not come as any surprise. South India, Indian Punjab, Gujrat do well again which not a surprise. All this is consistent with what we know about poverty and states in India not doing well. However this demonstrates the scale of poverty in India and Bangladesh.

You can stick your Mars, Venuses and Milky Way down the Ganga. Pakistan as whole comes out far, far better than India. Perhaps the reason why half of India has to poop outside is not because they are too tight with their money but maybe because they are too poor to eat let alone think of the post eating problems like building toilets.

Full Scale Map dataset for world here > http://www.mdpi.com/sustainability/.../html/images/sustainability-05-04988-g004.png



@Pluralist @Kambojaric @protest @SOUTHie
@django @WhyCry @Joe Shearer @nair @Talwar e Pakistan etc
Agreed with you. When it comes to poverty, Pakistan has much less poverty than India's.
 
.
We are on polar opposites in terms of any matter. We have our relation when it comes to development as, neither of us are a developed nation. Only that matters.


Here I agree with you, Pakistan and India are different and ideological, religious, cultural difference is the reason for parting ways...
 
.
PPP GDP of Mumbai and surrounding areas which is about 360 billion USD.
$360+billon is Nominal GDP of state of Maharashtra (Mumbai as capital). And it's not a Myth.

Here I agree with you, Pakistan and India are different and ideological, religious, cultural difference is the reason for parting ways.
Initially it was based on religion. But later we saw the two nation theory failing. And then added culture, language, ethnicity.
 
.
$360+billon is Nominal GDP of state of Maharashtra (Mumbai as capital). And it's not a Myth.


Initially it was based on religion. But later we saw the two nation theory failing. And then added culture, language, ethnicity.
How did the two nation fail?

Muslims and Hindus are two different communities.

Secondly we Pakistanis have no common with you Indians.

You Indians better stay away from us.
 
. .
$360+billon is Nominal GDP of state of Maharashtra (Mumbai as capital). And it's not a Myth.

Yes, the reason is Mumbai accounts for slightly more than 6.16% of India's economy contributing 10% of factory employment, 30% of income tax collections, 60% of customs duty collections, 20% of central excise tax collections, 40% of foreign trade and rupees 40,000 crore (US $10 billion) in corporate taxes to the Indian economy.[1] Headquarters of a number of Indian financial institutions such as the Bombay Stock Exchange, Reserve Bank of India, National Stock Exchange,

So all of India or a large part of India 1.35 billion population contributes to it....





at the same time PPP GDP of Mumbai is 368 billion USD.

"Mumbai, Navi Mumbai, Thane, Vasai-Virar, Bhiwandi and Panvel, had a 2015 GDP of US $368 billion when seen in terms of purchasing power parity (PPP)"

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...ias-economic-capital/articleshow/55655582.cms

And 6.16% of India's economy(Mumbai) contributing, with India GDP nominal at 2.45 trillion USD makes it less than 160 billion USD, so Mumbai GDP is not bigger than Pakistan nominal GDP as well.
 
.
Yes, the reason is Mumbai accounts for slightly more than 6.16% of India's economy contributing 10% of factory employment, 30% of income tax collections, 60% of customs duty collections, 20% of central excise tax collections, 40% of foreign trade and rupees 40,000 crore (US $10 billion) in corporate taxes to the Indian economy.[1] Headquarters of a number of Indian financial institutions such as the Bombay Stock Exchange, Reserve Bank of India, National Stock Exchange,

So all of India or a large part of India 1.35 billion population contributes to it....





at the same time PPP GDP of Mumbai is 368 billion USD.

"Mumbai, Navi Mumbai, Thane, Vasai-Virar, Bhiwandi and Panvel, had a 2015 GDP of US $368 billion when seen in terms of purchasing power parity (PPP)"

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...ias-economic-capital/articleshow/55655582.cms
I'm talking about Maharashtra state. You are pulling stats of a city. Hence it is given in PPP terms.

http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/State Budget 2017-18/Maharashtra Budget Analysis 2017-18.pdf

That's the state of Maharashtra.

Now, if you have no time to read all that, I will give a simple logical answer. I assume you don't dispute that Indian GDP (Nominal) is $2.26 trillion. Divide it by 29 you get around $80 billion. Whereas in PPP terms it's $8+ trillion.

Now that Maharashtra state is the richest in India. While there are states which produce a GSDP in the range of $2-10 billions and the second richest state is only generating $200+ billion (Don't remember exact numbers). Hope you understand now.

Yes, the reason is Mumbai accounts for slightly more than 6.16% of India's economy contributing 10% of factory employment, 30% of income tax collections, 60% of customs duty collections, 20% of central excise tax collections, 40% of foreign trade and rupees 40,000 crore (US $10 billion) in corporate taxes to the Indian economy.[1] Headquarters of a number of Indian financial institutions such as the Bombay Stock Exchange, Reserve Bank of India, National Stock Exchange,

So all of India or a large part of India 1.35 billion population contributes to it....
The real reason being Mumbai is situated towards a port. Where export and import is much higher than any other regions. That's why most of the coastal regions tend to better GDP while the landlocked states have poor GDP. Hence UP, Bihar, Orissa, Jharkhand have much less GDP. While Mumbai, Karnataka, Gujarat and other southern states have higher.

So, you cannot compare your country with landlocked states of India, rather compare them with states having large coastlines. Hence many people compare with Maharashtra.
 
.
I assume you don't dispute that Indian GDP (Nominal) is $2.26 trillion. Divide it by 29 you get around $80 billion. Whereas in PPP terms it's $8+ trillion.


I knew it, was talking about the fallacy of saying Mumbai GDP is higher than Pak, or the fallacy of saying that Maharashtra, just one state in India is richer than all of Pakistan...knowing the reason for it and the reason is mentioned earlier...citing it here again below.

30% of income tax collections, 60% of customs duty collections, 20% of central excise tax collections, 40% of foreign trade and rupees 40,000 crore (US $10 billion) in corporate taxes to the Indian economy.

So Maharashtra cannot be looked as separate entity as all of India contribute to its higher GDP, that was my point.
 
.
Bengali language and cultural movement. Two nation theory = fail. Now there is a country based on Language which they say has no cultural relation with West Pak.

Rest of your comment is gibberish as usual.
Had Bangladesh been part of India again, that would make the two nation theory fail.
two nation theory just took a different form.

As usual your arguments are garbage as you are the one who got banned a few hours ago :lol: ;)
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom