hussain0216
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 29, 2012
- Messages
- 21,096
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
Do we need to be officially appointed first to raise our voices against Genocide?
Your mentality is sick.
Azerbaijan took control of Nagorno Karabach with help of colonial Iran and Russia and changed the demography there, which is needed to be commended the same way as Israel was illegally formed. And if Muslims don't do it, then they are showing Munafiqah and double standards.
Similarly, the genocide by the ancestors of Muslims is as bad as any other genocide. We don't need any official appointment to condemn it. But it is again OPEN Munafiqah of Muslims where they don't condemn Turkish genocide of millions of Armenians in 1915 and taking the whole of historical Western Armenia, and making it a part of Turkey.
What type of stupidity is it that Armenians survived under Muslims and thus it became Halal for them to do their Genocide later and this genocide should not be condemned?
If we use your sick logic, then Palestinians are also living with Equal rights in Israel. Should then Israel also get the license to do their genocide now?
Moreover, there was no rebellion by Armenians in 1915. I already posted the proof. But you came up with a one-sided claim by a Turkish website that Armenians did a rebellion in 1875 (or something like that).
What stupidity is it that you kill people in 1915 for any alleged rebellion in 1875?
Moreover, in that genocide, Turkey killed over a million Armenians, which consisted of women and children and civilians who never did any rebellion.
What stupidity is it that you kill over million innocent women and children in 1915 for any alleged rebellion in 1875?
Moreover, I asked you that Hamas also rebelled now against Israel. Does it now gives a right to Israel to do the Genocide of Palestinians and kill them all?
That is why I repeatedly telling you to look at colonial role of your Muslim ancestors and genocides that were done by them, and not to show double standards and Munafiqah.
But unfortunately, religious fanatics like you are devoid of humanity and morals.
No, it is not a non-sequitur, but a proof of your double standards and munafiqah. I stay on my claim when I wrote:
Are Muslims able to see their double standards when they blame Israelis for invading Palestine but don't blame Azeris for the same thing?
It does not become non-sequitur only while you are unable to defend your double standards.
Again double standards.
British was a colonial power and it did not have the right to split India even on an administrative basis against the wish of the majority of people of India.
If the split was necessary, then the native population should have done it themselves.
And a similar argument can be made about Israel that the British made the split on an administrative basis. Why then you don't recognise the existence of Israel? Why did your Khomeini then want to destroy the whole Israel?
Moreover, your lame excuse of "administrative split" is also a lie. India was not split due to any administrative reasons, but Muslims demanded a new country purely based on religion.
It is so unfortunate that religious people have made LYING and Deceptions Halal for them. They feel absolutely no shame in using Taqiyyah for their deceptions.
What does atheism have to do with Zionism?
And when did Europe was destroyed for the spread of Atheism?
And if anyone kills for the spread of atheism, then we condemn and curse such a person. But do you have morals to condemn your Muslim ancestors for killing and enslaving non-Muslims for 14 long centuries?
The recent reality can never change. It is SECULARISM, which brought absolute peace in Western Europe for the last 70 years and no war took place there. Secularism is the reason that they became one union without borders.
And only Secularism can bring peace to the Palestine/Israel conflict. Till the time Hamas and Hizbullah and Israeli fanatics have the power to interfere, there will be no peace in Palestine.
Wrong. Faiths have nothing to do with the modern paradigm in Europe.
Firstly, the states became religion free. They altogether rejected religious laws on the state level. They went for a non-Religious Constitution and Laws, which were made only by Human Intellect (and were not based on any alleged Divine Intellect).
Only after that, we saw the rise of true Secularism in Europe.
The rule was simple, religion has no role in politics and laws, but it is only limited to personal lives of people.
This situation cannot be compared with the situation in Muslim countries, where up to 95% of Muslims want to impose Sharia laws on the state level and want to control even the private lives of humans through religion.
If you can support injustice and murder and occupation of Palestinians,, why can't we support it against murtads or Armenians?
Bro - she regards her family as Zionists - she’s a coconut Zionist
Yeahhh but that's like hindus throughout history, more loyal to the king, then the king himself
