What's new

France will have to accept India’s binding conditions in MMRCA deal

we have similar names for people of your region but won't make the mistake of writing it here dude
but bringing Chanakya into every debate wont change the fact that that how idiot or delusional you are

HE FORGET TENALI RAMAN ,BIRBAL,RAJA BHOJ,SHIVAJI AND MANY MORE

U mean HAL...DRDO doesnt build planes.......what abt LCA? :lol:

TEJAS IS MUCH BETTER THEN F 16 OLDER VARIANTS and it would have been equal to rafale if the project leaders defence forces would not have seen their oiwn benefits by overrunning time and then asking more budget then lagging with the project so that no other project could be given to them, our true professional engineers still work for country and i am saying all this because my brother works in lrde
 
.
TEJAS IS MUCH BETTER THEN F 16 OLDER VARIANTS and it would have been equal to rafale if the project leaders defence forces would not have seen their oiwn benefits by overrunning time and then asking more budget then lagging with the project so that no other project could be given to them, our true professional engineers still work for country and i am saying all this because my brother works in lrde

You dont know much about defence do you? how old are you? i bet ur in ur early teens!
 
. .
compared to jf 17 it's muchas better pal. Knocking your nuts in the wind doesn't make them jackfruit.


Lol... how about inducting a few of those first rather than comparing a paper jet with a "real" fighter.
 
.
Lol... how about inducting a few of those first rather than comparing a paper jet with a "real" fighter.

No Sir, if India was developing jf17 than still Indian air force never accepted as current aircraft configuration and performance.
By they way, if we will get mature aircraft than it would be better for us also in development we learnt so many things and it will be lot of help for future coming aircraft's



Still. Tejas-1 with current configuration is better than your..........................
 
.

No Sir, if India was developing jf17 than still Indian air force never accepted as current aircraft configuration and performance.
By they way, if we will get mature aircraft than it would be better for us also in development we learnt so many things and it will be lot of help for future coming aircraft's



Still. Tejas-1 with current configuration is better than your..........................

right.. its even better than f-22 raptor..
 
.
right.. its even better than f-22 raptor..


No, I Never said like that but all depends on airfore. Some airfore happy with lower performance aircraft or depend on his condition (Financially) and some set own high requirement and criteria. they wanted to achieve that.....................

Yes, some people can say, we should induct than try to improve as possible near future. it's depends..
 
.
No, I Never said like that but all depends on airfore. Some airfore happy with lower performance aircraft or depend on his condition (Financially) and some set own high requirement and criteria. they wanted to achieve that.....................

Yes, some people can say, we should induct than try to improve as possible near future. it's depends..


First complete tht paper plane of urs...
 
.
Role Multirole fighter
National origin India
Manufacturer Hindustan Aeronautics Limited
Designed by Aeronautical Development Agency
First flight 4 January 2001
Status Flight testing
Primary users Indian Air Force
Indian Navy
Number built 24
Unit cost US$25 million (estimated)

The HAL Tejas (Sanskrit: "Radiance") is a lightweight multirole fighter aircraft developed by India. It is a tailless compound delta wing design powered by a single engine. Originally known as the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) – a designation which continues in popular usage – the aircraft was officially named "Tejas" .
Limited series production of the Tejas commenced in 2007; it is currently projected to achieve limited initial operational clearance (IOC) with the Indian Air Force (IAF) by 2008, followed by full operational clearance (FOC) by the end of 2010. A two-seat trainer variant is also in development, as is a naval variant capable of operating from the Indian Navy's aircraft carriers. The IAF is reported to have a requirement for 200 single-seat and 20 two-seat conversion trainers, while the Indian Navy may order up to 40 single-seaters to replace its Sea Harrier FRS.51 and Harrier T.60.The LCA naval variant is expected to take to the skies by 2009.
Through the use of modern design techniques, lightweight materials and composites, it is expected to become the lightest modern jet fighter in production.



General characteristics
• Crew: 1
• Length: 13.20 m (43 ft 4 in)
• Wingspan: 44 ft 8½ in (13.62 m)
• Height: 4.40 m (14 ft 9 in)
• Wing area: 38.4 m² (413 ft²)
• Empty weight: 5,500 kg (12,100 lb)
• Loaded weight: 8,500 kg (18,700 lb (in fighter configuration))
• Max takeoff weight: 14,500 kg (31,967lb)
• Powerplant: 1× General Electric F404-GE - F2J3 turbofan
• Internal fuel capacity: 3000 liters
• External fuel capacity: 5×800 liter tanks or 3×1,200 liter tanks, totaling 4,000/3,600 liters
Performance
• Maximum speed: Mach 1.8+ (1,920+ km/h at high altitude) at 15,000 m
• Range: 2000 km (1,242 mi(without refueling))
• Service ceiling 15,950+ m (50,000 ft(Engine re-igniter safely capable))
• Wing loading: 221.4 kg/m² (45.35 lb/ft²)
• Thrust/weight: 1.07

:cheers:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom