Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I shall make it very clear that it's India invaded our land first(transpassed the Mcmahon line and illegally occupied south Tibet) then we had to fight back.These days everyone talks about the undying friendship with China. Permit me to briefly describe the history of India / China relationship.
India & Britain (because of Hong Kong) were among the very first non-Communist countries to recognise PRC (Peoples Republic of China) very early January 1950. Pakistan recognised PRC one year later in 1951.
Until 1954 India & China were close friends and some oldies might remember “Hindi Chini bhai bhai” slogan of the 1950's. ‘Five Principles” (Panchsheel) of peaceful coexistence was signed in April, 1954 between Indian & China which consisted of (1) Mutual respect for each other’s territorial integrity and sovereignty; (2) Mutual non-aggression; (3) Mutual non-interference in each other’s internal affairs;(4) Equality and mutual benefit: and(5) Peaceful coexistence. The good relations continued and Indian President Radhakrishnan visited China during September 1957.
It was not until January 1959 when PRC Premier Chou En Lai claimed 40,000 square miles of territory in Ladakh & NEFA that relations started to turn sour. A meeting between Pundit Nehru & Chou En Lai in Delhi during April 1960 failed to resolve the boundary question. In April 1959 Dalai Lama escaped from Lhasa to India where he was granted asylum. This act was nail in the coffin of good Sino Indian relations and culminated in the November 1962 border war between Indian & China.
Let us be clear, no country is any other country’s’ eternal friend, nor its eternal enemy. Qatar was a close friend and ally of other Arab Gulf countries and an active member of GCC where citizens of all member countries can travel and work freely without a visa. All of a sudden they are no longer friends. Former U.S. President Harry Truman alleged to have said of the US relationships: “If you want an eternal Friend, get a dog."
Pakistan / US friendship goes back 60 years when we joint SEATO & CENTO and Pakistan started receiving F-86 fighters, Patton tanks & the Ghazi submarine. Now some people are suggesting stopping buying US equipment!
Who is the ungrateful one?
We can’t afford French fighters, Russia is still quite close to India and no one knows for certain what would happen after Putin. This means relying 100% on the Chinese. Must we put all our eggs in one basket again?
If Sino Indian relations can plummet from Hindi China bhai bhai to physical fighting between the two giant neighbours in the span of 12 years; possibility of Pak – China relations going sour in a couple of decades cannot be ruled out altogether.
Pakistan has already diversified her military hardware acquisitions. In order to get the best bang for our buck, Pakistan must look for weapons that best suit her requirement from wherever the same can be acquired.
Can you brief it?I've personally seen Chinese Gunship in Pakistan when it was under testing. The gunship is nowhere near Americanish or any west country tech. The quality is extremely poor. Still the 30 years old American cobra's body is far rough, harder and qualitative over latest Chinese Z series....
Don't worry, USA dare not say bye bye to Pakistan.Say BYE BYE to US hardware.
The only way to make American happy is to cut ties with China and stop CPEC. China is determined to be a super power, so the conflict with USA is foreseen. Pakistan can't make USA and China both happy like used to be.I dont know why you are praising the French track record in past (supposedly), as it is irrelevant - end result is they are not selling anything now, which is worse than US who is still willing to sell weapons to Pak even in these worst circumstances.
RD93s were procured via China for a long time - that is a fact.
The whole debate was related to why PA and PAF is pursuing big ticket items from US such as AH1Z and F16s. I simply responded that they are the most capable, most affordable, and readily available. You have not provided any worthy alternatives be it Russians, Europeans or Chinese. Even if we include your honorable French here as well for theoretical purposes, they offer Rafales ... can PAF afford them instead of F16s? No!
You can continue to remain delusional and criticize Miltary decision makers over some imaginary alternatives that exist for Pakistan. Pakistans strategy seems very prudent; procuring indigenous or Chinese systems when feasible, slowly building relations with Russia now (I hate to keep repeating but this availability is quite recent, but some folks here think Russians have been willing to sell major weapons since 47, forgetting cold war and Afghan jihad period and Indian influence), and when US options are simply the best, then we have no choice but to swallow the bitter pill.
He was not making any comment about trusting or not to trust China, all of his post was generally describing the basic nature of the International Politics to some new/younger members that Friend can become enemy or enemy can become friends .... and the example of early days of India & China relation were given in that contextIf pakistan don't even trust China, I don't have anything to add here. Diversification is no wrong, do whatever you like.
Yeh, I can read his words. But I want to rectify his statement of China claiming lands from India is the root cause of 1962 conflict.He was not making any comment about trusting or not to trust China, all of his post was generally describing the basic nature of the International Politics to some new/younger members that Friend can become enemy or enemy can become friends .... and the example of early days of India & China relation were given in that context
I shall make it very clear that it's India invaded our land first(transpassed the Mcmahon line and illegally occupied south Tibet) then we had to fight back.
If pakistan don't even trust China, I don't have anything to add here. Diversification is no wrong, do whatever you like.
10/10What he'll 12 Zulu can do in a war against India? To showcase? You need hundreds of Z10 to deal with T90 tanks. Those Zulu in my eyes are just toys to make PA general feel pompous, to ensure the relationship between USA and Pakistan going on.
T129 with domestic turbo shaft engine is even better.10/10
*Showcase
*Toys
To be honest the only thing that protects Pakistan today is the nuclear assets. 12 helicopters is going to make no differance but as you stated they will look pretty on national day parade. Given the way relations are going with USA Pakistan needs to wean off US equipment.T129 with domestic turbo shaft engine is even better.