First glimpse into jf-17 block 3?

[khanasifm]

Semi stealth feature was mentioned in one news related to designer from China but who know what he said vs media picked up time will tell

 

[Riz]

 

[syed_yusuf]

View attachment 561654

PS

 

[ANG]

PS

Hi, exactly... Notice the front cockpit canopy, it is not even a one piece wrap around glass peice. Really bad photo shop!

 

[TheTallGuy]

NOSE LOOK HUGE!!!

 

[araz]

No, its not like that.
What if i say, LIRP would be w/o AESA.

Would make sense if PAF has asked for modifications/enhancements or the AESA is not ready. PAF may not wait and induct while the relevant AESA gets incorporated. It has been done before albeit for IFR probe so technically it can be done again.
A

 

[Sulman Badshah]

View attachment 561654

Photoshopped

 

[CriticalThought]

No, its not like that.
What if i say, LIRP would be w/o AESA.

LIRP?

 

[messiach]

AESA requires short inter-transmitter distance with HFOV around 150. Intermediary radars may be used instead.

Would make sense if PAF has asked for modifications/enhancements or the AESA is not ready. PAF may not wait and induct while the relevant AESA gets incorporated. It has been done before albeit for IFR probe so technically it can be done again.
A

low rate initial batch production.

LIRP?

 

[LKJ86]

View attachment 561654

 

[MastanKhan]

View attachment 561980

Hi,

So---is that BLK3---?

 

[Myth_buster_1]

Hi,

So---is that BLK3---?

No he is just showing the original picture... somebody tried doing a PS of this same picture with weird looking nose cone.

 

[Imran Khan]

Block 3 is still far away

 

[LKJ86]

Block 3 is still far away

Not so far away. Just be patient.

IMO, PAF wants JF-17 Block III to be the answer to India's Rafale, but a high cost-effective fighter at the same time.
It is a big challenge to PAF and CAC.

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

IMO, PAF wants JF-17 Block III to be the answer to India's Rafale

I hope it is true