You are very ignorant.
Deffer from T50's IRST exposed.
DSI is an inlet,multiple reflections and Absorption in it, Radar signal has none.
Suggest you take time to learn more about JF17,J10B,F35.
T50's IRST exposed prove Sukhoi non ability improve it to fusion aperture system like F35.
No it is you that is ignorant and not only are you ignorant but you twist everything, the DSI is a sphereical object just like an IRST housing, there is no 'multiple reflections', the same applies for the wing mounted spheres. It wouldn't even matter if the DSI is oval in shape the same laws would still apply, i also fail to see what the JF-17 or J-10 have anything to do with the conversation.
And what do you know about the PAK-FA's 'fussion' based on an IRST housing? Let alone an empty IRST housing?
My All content:B2 is a bomber,won't play subduction bomb!Which determines that it is at altitude put bombs and precision-guided ammunition. Radar on it are upward Angle, you will see the cockpit blocked B2's head basically , and for B2 is so large, that Americans also can'n make out so big of overall cockpit in that period, Americans won't be so fool, made that must be a reason.
Epic fail! What makes you think that a ground radar would be limited to only scaning the underside of a fusalage? Radars can track targets from hundreds of killometres away and in doing so the radars signals can have i diverse scanning area such as 30, 40, or even 10 gegrees, meaning it's not just the the fusalage that a radar will focus its signals on but virtually any part of the aircraft, your claim is further disproved by the fact that radar waves bounce and trivers or travel along surface areas. And again you fail to even acknowlege airborn radar.
T50 cockpit elliptic metal frame is directly outside leakage.
So the F-117 also had 'outside leakage'? Same for F-15SE? And what makes you think that metal would not get the same treatment as other parts of the aircraft and receive a coat of RAM?
YF - 23 prototypes failed,how to improve we don't know.
Stop copying and pasting the same reputitive sentences, the YF-23 failed because the YF-22 had an overal advantage and not because of it's RCS.
Yot don't know high-low collocation?
Commonsense please.
When is the F22 developed?
And When is the F35 developed?
It's very very normal that Applying new technology in F35.
You were the one that called the F-35 low end, not me, so don't go ranting and changing the subject once again.
F15SE is not a real 5'th G fighter.
It's stealth ability more worse than F35.
No one said it was a '5th generation' aircraft. And the conversation is in regards to radarblockers and frontal RCS, in frontal RCS the F-15SE is equal to the F-35, period! Get your head around it, nothing you say will change that.
Why you guy is so without ideal.Have no enterprising.Your sorrow or Russia's sorrow?
you like comparing T50 to F15SE,Why not F22,even F35?
If you were smart, which clearly you are not, you would see that the F-15SE was not a comparison but an example of the effectivness of radar blockers, and onlt idiotic fanboys would go around comparing the data of aircraft that is classified.
According to your account of radar blockers will magically dissolve,All plane can have stealth ability,for you can put radar blockers in all parts.
Do you have a reading comprehension problem? It was a sarcastic statement, i was actually lauhing at you for your blatant disregard for the effectivness of radar blockers.
Stealth is require multiple levels.structure,coating are most important.
Understand?
Listen kid you have no bussiness talking about 'stealth', you know nothing about the subject, period!
"blockers will magically dissolve."
Suggest you again take time to learn more about the Stealth technology of F22,F35.
You don't know the basics of stealth and I need to learn about 'stealth'?
I can't stop laughing when I see canards, and some nice spheres under under the J-20's wings :