Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So why do you think the engines are slightly angled towards the centre line of the PAK-FA?
To hide the engine blades i believe could be wrong though......
Once again a fanboy with zero understanding of stealth goes around making big red circles. Let me explain this in the simplest and easiest way possible The IRST ball is a sphere, a sphere by it self presents a very small surface area, and the surface area itself is sloped. By itself a sphere is many times smaller than a flat plane measuring the same area, even if we assume a sphere as small as an IRST housing returns a signal the signal would be insignificant likely something in the magnitude of an insect or smaller considering RAM, either way no radar would be able to detect something that small at meaningful ranges or any ranges at all.
And an illustration of a sphere and its efficiency, at scattering signals.
Aircraft such as the B-2, F-22, and F-35 have done away with the sharp angled and incorporated sphere like curvature, at a closer glace even parts such as a wing, more specifically a leading edge incorporates phere like geometry from the front.
What is this?
It looks like a sphere but wait there's more! The canopy is not a one piece canopy it gets better, the YF-23 an aircraft said to have a smaller rcs than the YF-22 had a two piece canopy, some F-35 prototypes also had two piece canopies.
As for the antennas you circled : as I stated before this is a prototype made for aerodynamics, the entire aircraft is fitted with antennas and even vein like cables in the wings for measuring load baring.
We are talking about T50,not F15SE.And again as stated for the 20th time radar blockers are as good as S-shaped intakes, this is evident in the Silent Eagle's frontal RCS.
Don't make me talk about the J-20's problems such as canards and lack of edge diffraction.
and then you complain about getting banned....DO NOT TRY TO DERAIL THE THREAD!!!!
Wrong...Every F-22 is strong with 'The Force'. We will find our targets easily enough.
Gambit...I am your Father!..ouuuphhh phhsssss ouuuphhh phhsssss
P.S. instructing US pilots to "search their feelings" to find the enemy ..may prove to be detrimental to TOP GUN scores ... don't you think ?
Maverick will never be the same pilot again.... or should I say Jedi Master Maverick ????
.
Many insects add up to a lot.And IRST is just on the one hand.
Russia in detail with the United States gap too far away
That's why Stealth performance:
F-22>J-20 ≈F-35 >>T-50
.....................................
Many insects add up to a lot.And IRST is just on the one hand.
Russia in detail with the United States gap too far away
That's why Stealth performance:
F-22>J-20 ≈F-35 >>T-50
B2 is a bomber,won't play subduction bomb!Which determines that it is at altitude put bombs and precision-guided ammunition. Radar on it are upward Angle, you will see the cockpit blocked B2's head basically , and for B2 is so large, that Americans also can'n make out so big of overall cockpit in that period, Americans won't be so fool, made that must be a reason.
To F35,you should know it's low-end aircraft.
F35's cockpit is the internal supporting frame, glass is whole, just because of low cost, so be inside lane supporting frame, glass coated with membrane the RCS effect without much distinction to F22,and another important reseon is for Weight loss for F35.overall cockpit is heavier.
We are talking about T50,not F15SE.
One of the biggest impact on stealth is the inlet invisible, radar blockers is a Remedial measures.China has an old idioms:亡羊补牢 better late than never.
Russia can consider Inlet stealth at the original design.
I still insist on my view.
Equipment storehouse openings of T50 haven't done stealth processing.Which means its RCS haven't delicate to need to consider these detail point.And equipment storehouse openings involves the body structure, also is not so good change in the later work.Any machine body seam or openings were related to structural strength of the change.
You claim that the PAK-FA's IRST is a detrimental to stealth, even though you have zilch to back claims with, while I do. But lets say your notion is true, lets say that it is a problem, what about the big round bulging DSI intakes of the J-20? Do the same principles not apply to the J-20 because ahhhh it's Chinese.
Lets take a look. the DSI sphere is quite larger than an IRST isn't it? The DSI is no different than a sphere cut in the center hemisphere, and while you may make an argument that it is not a full sphere the same principles apply, even more important is the fact that from the side it is a sphere, a very, very large sphere, now look at those nice round object under the wings, so if the PAK-FA's IRST sphere is an insect the J-20's sphere(s) is an elephant, again this is your logic, not mine.
Now i'll do what you do and point out flaws.
Looks like your argument backfired
And your little J-20 ≈F-35 nonsense just proves that you're a fanboy that should not be taken seriously.
What you are saying is ridiculous. Your are implying that the B-2's curvature is not important because only ground radar see its underside, Im sure designers were that stupid that they never considered something like airborne radar trying to actively locate bomber aircraft
This is just stupid
As for the F-35 being low end, it has some systems that even the F-22 lacks and other systems such as engines are superior to the F-22's.
We are talking about exposed compressor blades and radar blockers, clearly the F-15SE used radar blockers to get its frontal RCS to the level of the F-35, so the F-15SE is a relevant topic, a topic that disproves your theories, and I will call it theories because you have no science to support your theories.
This is another attempt of yours to make things fit as you see them, the F-15 SE reduced it's frontal RCS to the level of the F-35, so don't act like it's not a big deal or that somehow the radar blockers will magically dissolve.