Sino-PakFriendship
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2008
- Messages
- 869
- Reaction score
- 0
fxxking Ms. Kadeer
She is the biggest terrorist against China!
She is the biggest terrorist against China!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is NO Uighuristan
This is Xinjiang
Our West Region
If you are pan-Islamists, I definitely tell you that WE ARE NOT SERBIA!!!
We (1.4 billions of brothers) will not allow Xinjiang beome next KOSOVO!!!
My 96-year old mother wishes that I was religious. She's given up on that. Right-wing? maybe somewhat right of center. A nut? Perhaps, else why would I waste my time answering someone with the stupidest name?
New Recruit
and this desperate policy of urs is giving advantages to INDIA, more n more fanatic Indian muslims are disillusioned with ISLAMIC REPUBLIC of Pakistan..u side with muslim enemy no 1.and kill ur own citizens in the name of WOT A great nation born on islamic principles & made an islamic bomb is itself turning into an enemy of muslims..No doubt countries like S.arabia are getting more friendly with India..It is touching to see such concern amongst Indians for the Uighur Muslims. We can only hope they would show the same compassion when their fellow Indian Muslims are being butchered by security forces.
As for Pakistan's stance on the matter, it is a matter of real-politik. In real life, you have to pick your battles; Pakistan can't be the global savior of Muslims worldwide. Pakistan needs China and can't afford to upset it, so it will turn a blind eye to Chinese atrocities against the Uighurs. Certainly the Uighurs have legitimate grievances which should be resolved through peaceful means. But if even the US is powerless to compel the Chinese authorities to handle the matter peacefully, what chance does Pakistan have?
Every country is selective in its outrage. Australian economy is heavily dependent on China, so Australia does not complain too loudly when China does something against Australian interests or values.
India is busy licking America's butt so the Indian media throws a major tantrum every time there is a crime against Indians in Australia, but keeps mum on similar crimes in the US.
It's not pretty but that's life.
But we all knew that.
Even the Indians.
New Recruit
New Recruit
New Recruit
China's own internal affair.
The topic is "Fear pervades China's Uighurs"Brief Reprieve for India's North East
Too stretched to join Naxal fight: Army
Pranab Dhal Samanta Posted online: Mon Jun 07 2010, 08:59 hrs
New Delhi : Even as the Cabinet Committee on Security is actively considering a Home Ministry proposal to create unified commands in each of the five main Naxal-affected states with a military officer included in the set-up as an adviser, the Army has conveyed that it is too stretched to spare additional troops for any enlarged operational role. It is, however, more open to the idea of posting advisers.
While the Army stand, which is backed by the Defence Ministry, can be overruled if a political call is made to use the military in this fight, sources said, there are other complications. The Army is believed to have also pointed out that its troops cannot be deployed for active operation without adequate legal protection through the implementation of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act and related instruments.
Sources said initial proposals from the Home Ministry did in fact, suggest a more active role for the Army. An earlier idea to shift some Rashtriya Rifles battalions to these areas was, however, rejected by the Army on the grounds of insufficient troops. Instead, it proposed raising fresh RR battalions.
As a result, a more limited role for the military is under consideration. However, there are differences after the Home Ministry identified de-mining operations as one of the key tasks for the military. The Army has argued that de-mining cannot be segregated as an operational task as no area is permanently mined in this case. Sources said Maoists use mines and improvised explosive devices as and when they desire, so such capability will have to exist in the force that is deployed for the operations.
The Defence Ministry is likely to go along with the idea of setting up unified commands, but officials remain sceptical about its effectiveness. From what it on the table, the proposed structure will be headed by the chief secretary of the state, with senior officials of the state police and paramilitary forces deployed in that state as members.
Here again, there are issues over the rank of the military adviser. Given that the police are not keen to have an Army official senior to police officers represented in the command, the adviser may end up being of the rank of a Brigadier or a Colonel. The Army, however, seems to be of the view that an adviser of the sort being conceived should be someone more senior, with varied military experience.
A suggestion to involve retired officers to get around the issue of hierarchy was apparently shot down by North Block. Still, this is one issue on which the military is likely to agree despite its reservations.
For North Block, however, accommodating police concerns is proving to be an uphill task. Just like raising fresh RR battalions got entangled in turf issues as the force is officered by the Army, another South Block proposal to have the military open a National Counter-Insurgency Training School for helping the paramilitary and police has not made much headway.
The Army, meanwhile, is insisting that IPS officers deployed for operations too must undergo training before induction along with the paramilitary personnel under their command given the pivotal role leadership plays in tactical operations. It has also conveyed the importance of having an entire platoon undergo training with its commanders rather than just an unfamiliar group of personnel who are then posted to separate locations.
On the logistics front, more coordination is envisaged with a sub-area headquarters planned in Chhattisgarh, along with a training facility for special forces as a measure of both deterrence and training assistance.