What's new

Egypt religious authority says Ottomans ‘occupied’ Istanbul

. . . .
"Egypt’s Dar Al-Iftaa yesterday attacked Turkish President Recep Erdogan’s plan to change Hagia Sophia’s title from a museum to a mosque, describing the Muslims’ conquest of Constantinople (present-day Istanbul) as “the Ottoman occupation”."

Continue reading:
Egypt religious authority says Ottomans ‘occupied’ Istanbul


main problem....:-)


They are sending students to Europe for educating to become imaams.....:-)

They deserve to be humilated....8-)
 
.
These Melun-el Melun and Habis-el Habis High Priests of the little Firaun Sisi are 1K times worse than the High Priests and Magicians of the original Firaun. They accepted Islam when they saw the Mujize of Hazret-i Musa (PBUH)....

The Mujize of the Conquest of Constantinople was utteted by none other than Resulullah (PBUH) by saying "How wonderful is the Commander who conquers Constantinople, and how wonderful is ihis Army"....

Now, these Murtedin and Munafikin Zionists' poodle leaders in the Arab world, who have enslaved the Muslims, are supporting Kufr against Iman. May Allah's La'net be Daim upon them, and may HE destroy them....

By HIS PERMISIION, the dark days of the occupation in the Muslim Heartlands by the illegitimate progeny of Lawrence, a homosexual British Intelligence officer of Jewish origin, is going to be over soon for the Mehmet-chik (little Muhammeds) with Zulfikers in their hands are on the way to liberate them....
 
Last edited:
. .
Not really, the Spanish were there before the Islamic invaders, just like the Greeks and Arnenians, but, generally, moaning about past history doesn't do any good.
I can agree about armenians cause they were one of few ethnoreligious groups who have consistency with their identity but greeks??? one day they are spartans then byzantines-a term invented by western christians due to christianity schism otherwise byzantine was eastern part of Roman Empire after the western part fell to germanic “barbarian” tribes(that was the term used for several centuries before they become dominant and formed the states we know today as BIG 5)
Spaniards were actually new nation formed by one of those germanic(firstly pagan then christian) people
If you said that christians lived in the territory of modern day Spain before muslims I would agree with you because the native people who were part of Roman Empire already converted to christianity but the new settlers who migrated and even assimilated the natives as we know today are only 2 centuries before muslims(arabs) arrived so you can’t say that this territory was exclusively christian
No one depicts pagan germanic people as invaders but when it comes to muslims you jump quite easily to call them out as such
 
.
"Egypt’s Dar Al-Iftaa yesterday attacked Turkish President Recep Erdogan’s plan to change Hagia Sophia’s title from a museum to a mosque, describing the Muslims’ conquest of Constantinople (present-day Istanbul) as “the Ottoman occupation”."

Continue reading:
Egypt religious authority says Ottomans ‘occupied’ Istanbul

Well there is no denying that Turkey's invasion of Byzantium on the pretext of it being an Islamic Conquest, is a farce, a deception and a lie. Regardless on how you try to spin it, the turks used Islam to gain legitimacy for conquest of Byzantium which it would otherwise not have. Turks don't belong in Byzantium, they belong North of the Caucus mountains where their ancestors and they themselves come from. Arabs never drove out the Persians from Persia and occupied their lands. The Moor's didn't expel the Spanish or Portuguese from the Iberian Peninsula and convert all Churches to Masajid.

Nope, turks conquest of Byzantium shows political agenda, the depravity to have the Khilafah and being recognized in the Islamic World. Something very similar to what their cousins, the Khazars did, when they embraced Judaism. Doesn't matter how you spin it, Caucasians have always been very agenda driven, ego centric that converted to other faiths like Judaism and Islam, out of political expediency.
 
.
Well there is no denying that Turkey's invasion of Byzantium on the pretext of it being an Islamic Conquest, is a farce, a deception and a lie. Regardless on how you try to spin it, the turks used Islam to gain legitimacy for conquest of Byzantium which it would otherwise not have. Turks don't belong in Byzantium, they belong North of the Caucus mountains where their ancestors and they themselves come from. Arabs never drove out the Persians from Persia and occupied their lands. The Moor's didn't expel the Spanish or Portuguese from the Iberian Peninsula and convert all Churches to Masajid.

Nope, turks conquest of Byzantium shows political agenda, the depravity to have the Khilafah and being recognized in the Islamic World. Something very similar to what their cousins, the Khazars did, when they embraced Judaism. Doesn't matter how you spin it, Caucasians have always been very agenda driven, ego centric that converted to other faiths like Judaism and Islam, out of political expediency.
Nobody expelled christians until the notorious WW1 when they as ottoman subjects did a high treason and sided with the enemy during a fucking world war in which they hoped to carve out ethnostates of anatolia
So please don’t spread fake news
If we talk about today’s situation then your two favourite nations proved to be everything what you have falsely attributed to turks
 
Last edited:
.
Well there is no denying that Turkey's invasion of Byzantium on the pretext of it being an Islamic Conquest, is a farce, a deception and a lie. Regardless on how you try to spin it, the turks used Islam to gain legitimacy for conquest of Byzantium which it would otherwise not have. Turks don't belong in Byzantium, they belong North of the Caucus mountains where their ancestors and they themselves come from. Arabs never drove out the Persians from Persia and occupied their lands. The Moor's didn't expel the Spanish or Portuguese from the Iberian Peninsula and convert all Churches to Masajid.

Nope, turks conquest of Byzantium shows political agenda, the depravity to have the Khilafah and being recognized in the Islamic World. Something very similar to what their cousins, the Khazars did, when they embraced Judaism. Doesn't matter how you spin it, Caucasians have always been very agenda driven, ego centric that converted to other faiths like Judaism and Islam, out of political expediency.
It is funnier when I read your long, empty post with the voice of Hossein Imran and his accent :D
 
.
Those idiots don't rmember the hadis of our beloved Prophet alai salam about Constantinople??

What has happened to muslims?
Why are we cutting the roots of our own brothers?
There is a difference in opinion about that. Another hadith states that the conquering army would come from Medina. So the actual conquest is still going to happen.

I know as Pakistani you must love everything Turkish but it takes two to tango. The Arabs - and I am totally against these fairy tale fatwas from Egypt - had some reasons to oppose the Turks. If you read some history you would know. The Ottoman Empire in its final stage had some severe issues and they were also known for some interesting "succession rules" in the past. So no need to praise the Ottomans as Godsend force to fight evil in the world.

We Muslims must look at our history more criticallly, otherwise we are doomed to repeat our mistakes from the past.
 
.
arab leaders and sarkari molvis are all treacherous fks!
 
.
I was only talking about the conquest of Constantinople.
There is a difference in opinion about that. Another hadith states that the conquering army would come from Medina. So the actual conquest is still going to happen.

I know as Pakistani you must love everything Turkish but it takes two to tango. The Arabs - and I am totally against these fairy tale fatwas from Egypt - had some reasons to oppose the Turks. If you read some history you would know. The Ottoman Empire in its final stage had some severe issues and they were also known for some interesting "succession rules" in the past. So no need to praise the Ottomans as Godsend force to fight evil in the world.

We Muslims must look at our history more criticallly, otherwise we are doomed to repeat our mistakes from the past.

We cannot be complete revisionists either.
 
.
Well there is no denying that Turkey's invasion of Byzantium on the pretext of it being an Islamic Conquest, is a farce, a deception and a lie. Regardless on how you try to spin it, the turks used Islam to gain legitimacy for conquest of Byzantium which it would otherwise not have. Turks don't belong in Byzantium, they belong North of the Caucus mountains where their ancestors and they themselves come from. Arabs never drove out the Persians from Persia and occupied their lands. The Moor's didn't expel the Spanish or Portuguese from the Iberian Peninsula and convert all Churches to Masajid.

Nope, turks conquest of Byzantium shows political agenda, the depravity to have the Khilafah and being recognized in the Islamic World. Something very similar to what their cousins, the Khazars did, when they embraced Judaism. Doesn't matter how you spin it, Caucasians have always been very agenda driven, ego centric that converted to other faiths like Judaism and Islam, out of political expediency.


You was first a commie/chinese and now a protestant christian, you are indeed a shitty guy....

As long you are against Turks you can turn in everything, how they call it in Pakistan?

I believe ZINDIK>>>8-)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom