It’s not even about extreme ideology. The public doesn’t really get a vote. They flow into the paths open to them.
I don’t think people want a one man ruler for decades, but they want change. The current lot, as shown by the budget don’t want to bring about change. What IK offered was some change, not enough change IMHO, but still at the sped people were able to bear.
Frankly the elite have to decade if they are willing to bear the costs. The common man has to bear whatever is imposed on him. That’s not just in Pakistan, but anywhere in the world. It’s only that in many parts of the world, joining the elite is more meritocratic, so the general public accepts what comes down more.
There was a report to this exact point. A $2 Trillion economy by 2050. We have demographics on our side. And if we shape narrative correctly; a peaceful Pakistan, a liberal democracy, with a prosperous economy is good for the region and the world, we could rope in those global investors looking to India for growth.
Indians should be hoping for this change to take hold, it will be a multiplier effect for their economy, as trade will eventually resume and grow.
Therefore global investors will therefore see more opportunities in India and look to “buy in early” in Pakistan. This economic pressure will keeping all conflicts diplomatic between the two countries, by and large, akin to Greece and Turkey.
By the time India’s demographic dividend ends in about 20 years, Pakistan will have just reached its stride, having another generation to go before it plateaus in the 2060s.
Indeed, Pakistan needs a new narrative, to play the long game; the next 40 years (partner of both the US and China, as well as middleman to Central Asia). The old 1971-2021 Cold War/GWOT narrative has run out.
Lender says four influential groups have frustrated efforts to bring reforms in country
tribune.com.pk