What's new

DO INDIANS SUPPORT FORMATION OF TELANGANA STATE

. . .
But that is the point , precisely. Their demands have not been met. The Andhra and Coastal people have the State machinery in their hands and all the resources are diverted for their use, Telangana is not getting their fair share of water for their farming community. All the State Jobs are given to Andhra people, Telangana people are not getting their fair share of jobs. The list of grievances is long and have not been addressed for last 50+ years.

I think now with the support of BJP they might finally get their wish. Modi is firmly behind them.

No it is not like that,

1) Regarding water issues, Telangana is situated at an average height of 1500 Meters above the sea level and so Water can only be given using power plants which is costly.

2) Regarding the Govt. Jobs Telangana people are given due share of the Job quota and the recent statistics point to that.

3) Because of emergence of Hyderabad lot of jobs are getting created around hyderabad, almost 50 percent of telangana is benifitted because of Hyderabad which has lot of investments from Coastal Andhra.

4) The some of issues which they raised during the agitation are not relavant today as not moany people are depending on Govt. jobs.
 
.
Telangana seems to be a genuine case of negligence. So is Vidarbha, Bundelkhand and Gorkhaland. We can carve these regions out of the existing provinces but there is no guarantee that the regions will get the special care which they deserve. That being said I am always in favour of smaller administrative units.
 
.
Telangana seems to be a genuine case of negligence. So is Vidarbha, Bundelkhand and Gorkhaland. We can carve these regions out of the existing provinces but there is no guarantee that the regions will get the special care which they deserve. That being said I am always in favour of smaller administrative units.

If you don't know the demand of Vidharbha was trashed by the people of Vidharbha themselves. There was no resistance to the demand form the rest of the MH state. Even some of leaders support it. But in the last assembly elections all the leaders demanding separate state from all the parties were rejected by the people of Vidharbha.
State elections are due in a year and you will see no demand for it.
 
.
This is an Indian INTERNAL AFFAIR, why opening thread on this??

GOI will work out a plan which will be agreed by all, so don't worry.
 
.
If you don't know the demand of Vidharbha was trashed by the people of Vidharbha themselves. There was no resistance to the demand form the rest of the MH state. Even some of leaders support it. But in the last assembly elections all the leaders demanding separate state from all the parties were rejected by the people of Vidharbha.
State elections are due in a year and you will see no demand for it.


Yes .. I know that there is no demand for a separate Vidarbha State as of now. I was merely pointing out that the region needs special attention just like Bundelkhand and Gorkhaland.
There are several regions in India in need of special care. In my Bihar only there are some areas which are flooded every year. Whole infrastructure get destroyed.
 
.
yes yes they should form telangana....my state punjab nd haryana were also one long time ago but now both r different with one common capital...chandigarh........and now as a result we can c that both states r progressing alot....now they hav cities with huge developments(indian standard:D) like haryana has gurgaon, faridabaat.....capital...chandigarh...and punjab has amritsar, ludhiana, jallandhar(my city:partay:).....(we hav wealthiest cities of india with chandigarh..1, ludiana....7, jalandhar....10)
 
.
Yes .. I know that there is no demand for a separate Vidarbha State as of now. I was merely pointing out that the region needs special attention just like Bundelkhand and Gorkhaland.
There are several regions in India in need of special care. In my Bihar only there are some areas which are flooded every year. Whole infrastructure get destroyed.

Division is a good option for development /progress of the unattained area but it is not always the best option.

It's should be let to the people of the area to decide what they want. In Maharashtra case Vidharbha can develop better being part of MH than being a separate state.
 
.
Isn't Telangana a language?

Does that mean that this will be a newly created province based on language?

@Chinese-Dragon it's better to create a state/province inside one's own country rather than result in disintegration & create a totally new country based just on LANGUAGE.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Division is a good option for development /progress of the unattained area but it is not always the best option.

It's should be let to the people of the area to decide what they want. In Maharashtra case Vidharbha can develop better being part of MH than being a separate state.

Yes, You are right... Vidarbha has better chance of developing in MH especially with the kind of development going on now.

And the horrible experience of Jharkhand shows that smaller states are no guarantee for development. Jharkhand has the potential to develop the whole region.A Kolkata-Dhanbad freight corridor has every potential to be second only to Delhi-Mumbai industrial corridor. But the backward politics, illiteracy and huge corruption has helped in developing only one industry- Naxalism.
 
.
I believe the real solution is developing Telangana more and bring it on par with the Andhra.

But ultimately say of people of AP is what matters

Bhai mai Bihari hun. Jharkhand ke saath saath hamara poora ka poora raw material and mineral ore and coal and manganese and mica chala gaya. Saari iron and steel industry bhi chali gayi. We were left with Ganga maa waali kheti. And some refineries. Japanese once said, give us Bihar and we will rule the world.



West Bengal is a bad bad example brother. Industry kahan hai wahan? Psycho Didi ko poocho.

?????????????????
 
.
Yes, You are right... Vidarbha has better chance of developing in MH especially with the kind of development going on now.

And the horrible experience of Jharkhand shows that smaller states are no guarantee for development. Jharkhand has the potential to develop the whole region.A Kolkata-Dhanbad freight corridor has every potential to be second only to Delhi-Mumbai industrial corridor. But the backward politics, illiteracy and huge corruption has helped in developing only one industry- Naxalism.

That's the actual problem in new state. Nobody has the complete control and everybody want the full control. So result is always a mess.

Given the Jharkhand's condition it has everything right to develop expect a strong willing developer. Everybody there look at the state as a grazing ground and bounty field. Nobody cares about development there. Sad but true.
 
.
I fully support creation of Telangana state within Union Of India.. this will help in breaking states down to more manageable size and national funds can be managed properly. Look at Jharkhand.... and Uttaranchal.... both carved out of existing large states .. and now they are doing even better then their parent states.

uttarakhand might be doing better but not jharkhand.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom