Did colonization ruin India's image?

[faithfulguy]

Your cowards Emperors allowed them to dump opium in China to save their dynasty while we Indians fought against British till the last. Don't talk about who owned whom.

China lost the war against Britain. But since china was a united country, it was more difficult to just annex a piece of land.

Each Indian kingdom taken over by Britain did resist. But ultimately, since India was not a country, Britain can take over one kingdom at a time. Another historical even occurred because India was not a country.

 

[INDIC]

China lost the war against Britain. But since china was a united country, it was more difficult to just annex a piece of land.

Each Indian kingdom taken over by Britain did resist. But ultimately, since India was not a country, Britain can take over one kingdom at a time. Another historical even occurred because India was not a country.

China was the only country which was looted by European powers without conquering it. It shows the extent of cowardice of Qing Dynasty. While in India we fought against British till the last. While your last Emperor Puyi even became Japanese agent betraying his the country their ancestors united.

 

[faithfulguy]

We threw away Portuguese out of our land while your government waited until 1999 to get back Macau.

The land was leased. And India was wrong to invade Goa. India should still compensate for such an invasion as Britain only grant independence to British India. Goa was portugese territory.

China was the only country which was looted by European powers without conquering it. It shows the extent of cowardice of Qing Dynasty. While in India we fought against British till the last. While your last Emperor Puyi even became Japanese agent betraying his the country their ancestors united.

You are grasping straws and making up things that are incoherent. Answer this, was the country of India created by Britain?

 

[INDIC]

The land was leased. And India was wrong to invade Goa. India should still compensate for such an invasion as Britain only grant independence to British India. Goa was portugese territory.

By that logic even the removal of Qing Dynasty was also wrong since Puyi didn't abdicate by his own wish.

You are grasping straws and making up things that are incoherent. Answer this, was the country of India created by Britain?

Are you saying China wasn't looted by European power.

 

[Fattyacids]

While in India we fought against British till the last. While your last Emperor Puyi even became Japanese agent betraying his the country their ancestors united.

I'm calling your bluff, many of hindu states gladly welcome the British as a resistance force against the Muslim rulers. Many Indians even adopted English name as middle name, LOL. You guys adore the British!

 

[faithfulguy]

By that logic even the removal of Qing Dynasty was also wrong since Puyi didn't abdicate by his own wish.

Invasion of Goa was wrong as India was created by Britain. And Goa was never part of British India.

 

[INDIC]

I'm calling your bluff, many of hindu states gladly welcome the British as a resistance force against the Muslim rulers. Many Indians even adopted English name as middle name, LOL. You guys adore the British!

You don't have knowledge of Chinese history, how will you even have the knowledge of Indian history.

Invasion of Goa was wrong as India was created by Britain. And Goa was never part of British India.

Republic of China was illegal, China belong to Manchu people and Qing Dynasty because they created united China.

 

[Fattyacids]

You don't have knowledge of Chinese history, how will you even have the knowledge of Indian history.



Republic of China was illegal, China belong to Manchu people and Qing Dynasty because they created united China.

LOL, sidestepping to making personal attacking is an admission that you've lost the argument.
You guys welcomed the British with open arms.

 

[INDIC]

LOL, sidestepping to making personal attacking is an admission that you've lost the argument. You guys welcomed the British with open arms

You better replied with proper logic instead of displaying your skyrocketing high IQ.

 

[Fattyacids]

You better replied with proper logic instead of displaying your skyrocketing high IQ.

I always argued logically based on facts.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

What was the name of the companies?
Dutch East India Company,
British East India Company....etc etc

Funny how all include an imaginary name called 'India'. Damn, we baniyas must have copyrighted it

 

[INDIC]

What was the name of the companies?
Dutch East India Company,
British East India Company....etc etc

Funny how all include an imaginary name called 'India'. Damn, we baniyas must have copyrighted it

Oldest reference of the word 'India' is Herodotus 440BC while the name 'China' is a colonial name given by Portuguese.

 

[faithfulguy]

What was the name of the companies?
Dutch East India Company,
British East India Company....etc etc

Funny how all include an imaginary name called 'India'. Damn, we baniyas must have copyrighted it

India is like "Europe" at the time. A geographical location.

Oldest reference of the word 'India' is Herodotus 440BC while the name 'China' is a colonial name given by Portuguese.

Asia minor was even created earlier. And India is a place like Asian minor. Or Levant or Persia or Arabia. Now, there were real Persia empire, but Persia is a name of a people and place.

The name Iran is more than a country, as Pushtans and Azabajanis are also Iranian people. Also, Uzbek and Kazaks are Turks. This does not mean that Afghanistan or Azabajan are part of Iran. And Uzbeks should be park of Turkey.

Indian the country today today is even more diverse than Turks or Iranians (the people, not the country). Its compose of Indo-Aryans in the north and Dravidians in the south. Both people have a varied degree of Australoid in them. Plus, there are some original Australoid in the mix. No wonder Britain was needed to create a country called India.

 

[INDIC]

Asia minor was even created earlier. And India is a place like Asian minor. Or Levant or Persia or Arabia. Now, there were real Persia empire, but Persia is a name of a people and place.

The name Iran is more than a country, as Pushtans and Azabajanis are also Iranian people. Also, Uzbek and Kazaks are Turks. This does not mean that Afghanistan or Azabajan are part of Iran. And Uzbeks should be park of Turkey.

Indian the country today today is even more diverse than Turks or Iranians (the people, not the country). Its compose of Indo-Aryans in the north and Dravidians in the south. Both people have a varied degree of Australoid in them. Plus, there are some original Australoid in the mix. No wonder Britain was needed to create a country called India.

We are descendants of same people who lived here during 5th century BC and we still use the same names of the many regions which we used several thousands of years ago like Kerala, Kashmir, Andhra, Gomantak(Goa), Kamrupa, Magadha etc.

India is like "Europe" at the time. A geographical location.

China is like colonial history of America, the land outside Zhongyuan were colonized by Han people and stolen from the native inhabitants.

 

[Vinod2070]

Best thing that happened to India is get colonised by the British. The British gave India a unified country, they civilized the Indians as much as they could (obviously not enough), they taught English to the Indians, etc.

Without the British, Indians would be where Africans are today.

I still think India would be better governed and Indian people more civilized if Britain still ruled India.

There are 2 groups of people that should never have a right to self rule, it's Africans and Indians. They are very backward people, thus they would perform much better under foreign rule.

The Brits gave Indians everything they have now. As far as I'm concerned, Britain should be applauded for partially civilizing the Indians.

Primitive barbaric fil.thy "livestock" (that Manchus called you and therefore the Q hairstyle) could never be even partially civilized though.

India is like "Europe" at the time. A geographical location.



Asia minor was even created earlier. And India is a place like Asian minor. Or Levant or Persia or Arabia. Now, there were real Persia empire, but Persia is a name of a people and place.

The name Iran is more than a country, as Pushtans and Azabajanis are also Iranian people. Also, Uzbek and Kazaks are Turks. This does not mean that Afghanistan or Azabajan are part of Iran. And Uzbeks should be park of Turkey.

Indian the country today today is even more diverse than Turks or Iranians (the people, not the country). Its compose of Indo-Aryans in the north and Dravidians in the south. Both people have a varied degree of Australoid in them. Plus, there are some original Australoid in the mix. No wonder Britain was needed to create a country called India.

What a surprise. The same zombie, the same posts...

Invasion of Goa was wrong as India was created by Britain. And Goa was never part of British India.

I think your handling by the Manchus and Mongols was right though.

And also the opium that the British force fed you. You are so eternally grateful for that and it shows in every post...